> Luca, > > as we can infer from your signature, you are not exactly the most > neutral person to judge about this particular technology JDO.
I didn't want to judge JDO, I can tell about JDO technology and how it can fit inside Daisy to improve this product. Period. > > Sorry but I didn't want to start a flame.. > > Get real. > There are a "million" standards for data access and one pretends to be > the last solution for the portability project. First was SQL, then ODBC, > then JDBC, then ODMG, now JDO. > > Let me tell you something: look around. look at the cocoon codebase. we > use what we need, not because it's standard, but because it fits our > needs. And went the "standard" doesn't, we implement our own, or we tune > it down for our needs. You said: "we use what we need, not because it's standard, but because it fits our needs" So why JDO doens't fit your need? Until now I never heard a technical reason to NOT use JDO! > People, on the other hand, how *STUPID* it is to fight about technology, > eh? Luca wants to use JDO, great, let him be happy with it. > > Luca, why daisy doesn't use JDO? because it doesn't. period. no much > more to add. > > You want daisy to use JDO? submit code instead of evangelizing. I didn't want to evangelize anyone. Just to launch a proposal that seems interesting to me. Period. Instead I heard many people to warm up a bit... > Stefano, who's sick of standard evangelization big time! But XML is a standard? :-D bye, Luca Garulli OrienTechnologies.com (the light ODBMS, all in one JDO solution)
