Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: > Reinhard Pötz pisze: <snip/>
>> SVN >> ------------------------------- >> I'm not sure about the new location in SVN. One option I can think of is >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/cocoon3-trunk, the other is >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/branches/cocoon-3 >> >> I slightly prefer http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/cocoon3-trunk. > > Hmmm. What about http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/cocoon3/trunk > (and possibly tags, branches as well in future)? > > For me repository layout is rather important since I'm using Git to > access our Subversion repository and I don't want to make it confused by > all these non-standard layouts. I have no strong opinion on this. If this works better with git, I'm fine with your proposal. <snip/> >> CI >> ------------------------------- >> Apache Infrastructure offers a managed Hudson instance. I propose to >> setup a Cocoon 3 project there. > > Why Hudson instead of Continuum? > > Is Hudson more flexible or has a better performance? Or just personal > preference? Unlike Continuum, I've never had any problems with Hudson. IMO it's also more intuitive and makes it easy to configure any Maven/JDK combination. And, it is also smart because it automatically detects upstream and downstream projects by analyzing the POM structure. Also Jason seems to be a Hudson fan (http://maven.markmail.org/message/q6thc63lzby23d5h) -- Reinhard Pötz Managing Director, {Indoqa} GmbH http://www.indoqa.com/en/people/reinhard.poetz/ Member of the Apache Software Foundation Apache Cocoon Committer, PMC member [EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________________________________
