--- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, what version would you use for the > non-genericized functor? 1.0? > Then, the genericized version should be 2.0 (with > o.a.c.functor2 > package names)?
Good questions! I suppose that's the thing to do, with the understanding that my pushing this makes me liable if I don't get off my ass and do what's needed to get that branch releasable, huh? -Matt > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Guys, I don't care what happens where--we can use > > trunk for generics work, but I would like the > option > > of finishing a non-generic version of the lib > (branch > > is fine by me) so we can evaluate the difficulty > of > > swapping it out for the similar parts of a (also > > non-generic) Collections 4.0. > > > > -Matt > > > > > > > > --- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:06 PM, sebb > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I'd suggest leaving them with the Java > files, > > > assuming that they are > > > > related to each other. > > > > [JMeter has some beans with related property > > > files; these are easy to > > > > maintain because the files are all in the > same > > > directory. It would be > > > > a bit of a pain otherwise.] > > > > > > > > src/main/resources seems more suitable for > common > > > resources shared by > > > > lots of files. > > > > > > > > BTW, +1 to reviving the project. > > > > > > > > > > Since there are so many folks interested in > reviving > > > it, do you guys > > > want to split up the work of "genericizing" the > > > classes? We could > > > split it up by packages? > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > > You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you > one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. > > > http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
