Matt Benson skrev  den 01-04-2008 23:30:
--- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

So, what version would you use for the
non-genericized functor?  1.0?
Then, the genericized version should be 2.0 (with
o.a.c.functor2
package names)?

Good questions!  I suppose that's the thing to do,
with the understanding that my pushing this makes me
liable if I don't get off my ass and do what's needed
to get that branch releasable, huh?

Since functor never left the sandbox, why not just scrap the old stuff, and keep the package names?

--
 Thorbjørn

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to