On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I did not do this one as is it seems RFC4180 defines CR+LF as the record
> > separator as noted in the Javadoc for
> > org.apache.commons.csv.CSVFormat.DEFAULT.
> >
>
> That's where the name of this component gets confusing to me.  Since
> it's called "CSV", it would make sense that we follow RFC 4180, which
> defines the standard for comma-separated value files and thus the
> default record separator would be CRLF.  However, we are allowing
> users to define whatever format they want using properties of the
> CSVFormat class (of course, if you use delimiter != ',', then it's not
> really CSV).  So, what's the intent?  This is more of a
> delimited-record format parser/writer component which supports CSV.
> Thus, it is not really very well-named.
>

Why not rename DEFAULT to RFC418?

Gary


> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to