On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, James Carman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Are these specific examples not the words you would actually use were >> you having a discussion on the subject in English? :P >> > > Why not just support both? The "with*" methods would just be aliases > for the more "natural language" method names.
Or vice versa, sounds reasonable. :) Matt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
