Matt Benson wrote:
> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
>
> - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
> system property, might be better represented as "row separator" so as
> not to imply that the parameter should be in any way limited to \r or
> \n . I would think the default for this would be the line.separator
> property, however, and thus should take a String or CharSequence
> (perhaps it already does, but there's been so much talk about char
> parameters...).
>
> - with* methods: just something to think about here, but while we're
> creating a fluent API, would e.g. #delimitedBy('\t') read more
> fluently than #withDelimiter('\t') ? #escapingWith('\\') vs.
> #withEscape('\\') ?
+1, good idea!
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
