Matt Benson wrote: > Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline: > > - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator > system property, might be better represented as "row separator" so as > not to imply that the parameter should be in any way limited to \r or > \n . I would think the default for this would be the line.separator > property, however, and thus should take a String or CharSequence > (perhaps it already does, but there's been so much talk about char > parameters...). > > - with* methods: just something to think about here, but while we're > creating a fluent API, would e.g. #delimitedBy('\t') read more > fluently than #withDelimiter('\t') ? #escapingWith('\\') vs. > #withEscape('\\') ?
+1, good idea! - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org