On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:27 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 17:08, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>>> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
>>>
>>> - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
>>> system property, might be better represented as "row separator" so as
>>> not to imply that the parameter should be in any way limited to \r or
>>> \n . I would think the default for this would be the line.separator
>>> property, however, and thus should take a String or CharSequence
>>> (perhaps it already does, but there's been so much talk about char
>>> parameters...).
>>>
>>> - with* methods: just something to think about here, but while we're
>>> creating a fluent API, would e.g. #delimitedBy('\t') read more
>>> fluently than #withDelimiter('\t') ? #escapingWith('\\') vs.
>>> #withEscape('\\') ?
>>
>> +1, good idea!
>
> Not sure I agree.
> The advantage of a common prefix is that they work well with IDEs.
I can appreciate that if you began to type "with"... the IDE could
show ten different things you could be trying to use, but I don't know
that I'd go so far as to call this "working well with" the IDE.
>
> Also I think it's confusing to have xxxBy and yyyWith.
Are these specific examples not the words you would actually use were
you having a discussion on the subject in English? :P
Matt
>
>> - Jörg
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
