On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:59 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 October 2013 12:25, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If nobody is willing to put a component to "dormant" state, then the > > label doesn't make any sense. I would vote to remove the dormant state in > > general. > > If we don't have any need of a specific component we can put it to > > attic.apache.org too. > > No need to duplicate things. > > AFAIK, the Attic is for entire TLPs only, not individual components.
There are XML subcomponents there. Jakarta ones went dormant iirc, but then moved over as subcomponents and not the overall umbrella. So I don't think there's a reason why a Commons component wouldn't fit. Hen
