+1 and it seems Git is too popular to avoid.

Gary

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 10/2/15 12:08 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Well, a champion can volunteer to shepherd this through our incubator I
> > suppose,
>
> OK, I will volunteer to do this.  I propose that we start this as a
> Commons Sandbox project.  To do that, we need a VOTE to accept the
> code, a software grant and the IP clearance form [1] submitted to
> the Incubator PMC.  We can use either git or svn for the new sandbox
> repo.
>
> Any objections?  Any preference for git or svn?
>
> Phil
>
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
>
>
> >  like CommonsRDF, which seems pretty inactive ATM. There is also
> > the issue of "donate and forget" vs. staying plugged in the community.
> >
> > I just do not have the extra FOSS cycles to dig into the code ATM to see
> > what's under the hood.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/2/15 11:46 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>> I do not have time to dig into this one ATM but I'd like to give my 2c.
> >>>
> >>> Does this project introduce a new RE-like language or is it an API
> >> wrapper
> >>> for REs? It sounds like it is both.
> >> It looks to me like what it says it is, which is an alternative to
> >> REs, which IMO is a nice idea.  Less "pattern matching language" and
> >> more objects expressing matching intent.  End result is less
> >> developer thought required to accomplish a common task.  Seems to
> >> fit nicely in Commons to me.
> >>
> >> Phil
> >>> A project like this I could see in Commons if the project was split
> into
> >> an
> >>> API module and modules for different pattern matching languages, where
> >> the
> >>> standard Java RE would be the reference example. Naomi (I love the name
> >>> BTW, someones wife or daughter?) would be another implementation
> module.
> >>> With both under its belt, the project would be on fairly solid footing
> >>> (granted I do not know Naomi). You could even imaging implementations
> >> that
> >>> would accept a JXPath or a SQL WHERE clause.
> >>>
> >>> If the project is only meant to introduce a new RE-like language, then
> a
> >>> TLP would be probably more appropriate.
> >>>
> >>> 2c,
> >>> Gary
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 9/29/15 3:55 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>>>>> Norman,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hello and welcome to Apache Commons.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It's not clear to me why Naomi is better than regular expressions.
> >>>>> Pointing
> >>>>>> to Javadocs is not the best way to get traction.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Your project would be better served by having some documentation on
> >>>> your
> >>>>>> front page with an example driven tutorial.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Is Naomi faster than REs?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What can I do in Naomi that REs can't do? And vice-versa.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Examples of this on your front page would help you at least get
> folks
> >>>> to
> >>>>>> consider learning a brand new way of doing things...
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>> The code in SimpleExamples starts to get to this.  Looks interesting
> >>>>> and powerful.  Either here or on the github readme you should take a
> >>>>> stab at explaining a little more how hard problems using regex get
> >>>>> easier with naomi, illustrated with some simple examples.  Then
> >>>>> maybe with help from community members here, you can develop some
> >>>>> overview / getting started docs that help people get into the code.
> >>>>>
> >>>> +1.
> >>>>
> >>>> Reading SimpleExamples, my summary would be a boilerplate description
> of
> >>>> "It replaces the arcane regular expression language with an API". It
> >>>> reminds me of command line argument parsers. Perl had/has a great
> >> regular
> >>>> expression like command line argument parser, but it was cryptic and
> you
> >>>> either loved it or hated it. Then along came Commons CLI, args4j and
> all
> >>>> the others, providing a more OO/procedural API instead of its own mini
> >>>> language. Not as 'powerful' (in that you had to type more), but
> simpler
> >> (in
> >>>> that you didn't have to learn a new lingo and didn't have to juggle
> >>>> multiple languages inside one context (a source file)).
> >>>>
> >>>> I definitely need that user manual. It's hard, with a brain trained on
> >>>> regular expressions, to read 'Pattern greek3=new
> >> CharSequencePattern("?")'
> >>>> and realize (I think) that it means a literal ? character. It's also
> the
> >>>> primary way it'll be successful. You need that educational path that
> >>>> explains what a ExplicitCharClass is for, rather than randomly
> clicking
> >> on
> >>>> javadoc :)
> >>>>
> >>>> There'll also be much debate to be had I suspect. Is "a-e" too
> complex,
> >>>> compared to "abcde" or "a","e". Which parts of regex are worth
> >> supporting,
> >>>> vs not. Can I mix bits of regexp with bits of Naomi?   new
> >>>> ExplicitCharClass("a-eg-p").
> >>>>
> >>>> Random.... I'd like the idea of varargs for automatic and'ing. ie:
> >>>>
> >>>> new ExplicitCharClass("a-p", "!f")   [and is a not char class too
> >>>> complex?].
> >>>>
> >>>> Continuing on my summary, as I peruse the code a little more, I'd go
> >> with:
> >>>> "Build a regular expression via an API, not an arcane language of its
> >> own".
> >>>> I'd love to see that grow to:
> >>>>
> >>>> "Express regular expressions as objects, or mix and match objects with
> >> that
> >>>> arcane mini language we all love or loathe".
> >>>>
> >>>> Hen
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to