On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Bernd Eckenfels <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am Sun, 25 Oct 2015 15:58:28 -0700 > schrieb Phil Steitz <[email protected]>: > > > On 10/25/15 3:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > Let's see, would we run this through the Apache Incubator or could > > > we simply run it through our Commons Sandbox and then up to Commons > > > itself? > > I think we can just start in the sandbox, following the Incubator IP > > clearance process as we have done before. I volunteered above to > > manage the IP clearance process and VOTE to accept. It seems like > > there is some interest here in working on it, so that qualifies for > > the Sandbox, IMO. > > I think the project is in a pretty bad shape. I would prefer to wait > till it is overhauled and mavenized (I did not understand the > merge into ghpages, if this can be renamed to master and fix the broken > links in the README, that would be a start. I still havent seen any > sample of the Naomi syntax/power...) > > And from my POV that would be a precondition to see some commitment of > the original submitters. Why would we rush things? > It seems OK to put Naomi in the Sandbox and then let anyone hack on making it Mavenized, Common-ized and so on. Then we can all see and play with it better it would seem to me. Gary > > Gruss > Bernd > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
