Chris, The easy summary is that Apache would like to keep apache sites being served by apache controlled hardware.
Github serving pages fails that test. On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I think those other comments about Jekyll had to do with keeping all of > > the site storage on apache servers. > > > > > I'm not sure I understand how Jekyll affects that. Are we concerned that > GitHub will not render the site's source accurately? And, if so, wouldn't > that concern extend to non-Jekyll static sources also? > > > > There have been objections in this thread about using github.io based > > sites even with site name masquerading. > > > > > Does anybody wish to summarize those? I think it would be helpful. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Mar 6, 2015, at 14:36, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Regarding some of the other comments about jekyll... it's not true that > > you > > > need jekyll. You can publish plain HTML or Markdown also. > > >
