On Mar 11, 2015, at 5:40 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chris, > > The easy summary is that Apache would like to keep apache sites being > served by apache controlled hardware. Is that right ? Or is it more an issue of keeping the source under ASF canonical repo ? > > Github serving pages fails that test. > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> I think those other comments about Jekyll had to do with keeping all of >>> the site storage on apache servers. >>> >>> >> I'm not sure I understand how Jekyll affects that. Are we concerned that >> GitHub will not render the site's source accurately? And, if so, wouldn't >> that concern extend to non-Jekyll static sources also? >> >> >>> There have been objections in this thread about using github.io based >>> sites even with site name masquerading. >>> >>> >> Does anybody wish to summarize those? I think it would be helpful. >> >> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Mar 6, 2015, at 14:36, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Regarding some of the other comments about jekyll... it's not true that >>> you >>>> need jekyll. You can publish plain HTML or Markdown also. >>> >>
