On 14 May 2015 at 23:38, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > I seriously updated content: > - *every* TLP is listed, even when no DOAP file has been written [1] > - TLP project can be displayed, even without DOAP and provide link to every > sub-project [2] > - when a TLP has a "main sub-project" with its DOAP file, data from TLP and > data from DOAP subproject are clearly separate [3]
The URLs [1] [2] [3] use the same namespace for PMCs and projects as well as generic queries. This may cause name clashes in future - e.g. a PMC called "numbers" would clash with the "numbers" view of the data. It would be better to use distinct namespaces for distinct types of item. > This makes more clear what DOAP is used for (and why we need projects hand- > writing some data, but not everything) > > I didn't update target doap urls [4] since I don't know what precisely to do: > copy doap files that were processed, in appropriate directory, and with > consistent filename than generated json? What are the target DOAP files used for? Where do they originate? > Feedback expected :) > > Regards, > > Hervé > > > [1] https://projects-new.apache.org/projects.html?pmc > > [2] https://projects-new.apache.org/project.html?commons > > [3] https://projects-new.apache.org/project.html?ant > > [4] https://projects-new.apache.org/doap/
