On Sat, Mar 30, 2019, 14:44 Naomi Slater <n...@tumbolia.org> wrote: > On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 19:28, Myrle Krantz <my...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 7:20 PM Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 30, 2019, at 10:41 AM, Naomi Slater <n...@tumbolia.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > I've done a > > > > lot of work for Apache and this is the first time I recall seeing > your > > > > name. so I hope you will excuse me for not thinking your imputation > > > carries > > > > much weight > > > > > > > > > > Please don't go there. > > > > > > > JIm, that was directed at Wade, not you. > > > > and my point wasn't "I've done more work than you so I am right". my point > was "who are you to tell me I don't care about this organization because I > 'dare' to criticize 'the meritocracy'". which I believe is a perfectly > reasonable comment in reply to such a preposterous claim >
And mine was there is a line in this thread attacking the way a lot of very inclusive people work here, and that line is like "your points have no merit, but we'll make changes and drive them, that affect the whole org, while using meritocracy while saying it is bad at lower levels", and in this case it is everyone's concern even if they are not working on the specific thing you are, because it impacts the whole/everyone working on something at Apache, and is also directly related to my point on the possibility to exist for overreach and overreaction considering that. Folks chose to throw around weight with various phrases such as "because the President" and "policing". Where is the plan for what this looks like given these mandates? Wade
