Okay gentlemen, I think there have been countless good points made from all parties, but also some bike-shedding.
Perhaps it is time to schedule some face-time to better articulate some of the finer points, and to help come to some consensus? -Michal On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry if this got asked before, but does a feature branch get deleted > after it is merged? Just wondering about branch clutter over a long period, > or if this is just the same as a topic branch using today's committer > workflow. > > > On 1/14/2013 5:34 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > >> You work on a Feature branch. It gets rolled into Dev as needed so >> others can merge / collaborate on said feature. When it feels right >> instead of merging a large set of potentially breaking commits to >> Unstable the dev working on said feature just merges that feature. >> This would require more responsibility for the committer to keep track >> of their feature branches which I could see as being more overhead. >> >> >
