Yay for grannies using G+! (mine does, too, which is great, and far less annoying than her FB game invites!)
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > I was the one who didn't want to sign up for G+ :) > > Now it's a moot point as my gramma uses it and so, by proxy, I am required > to as well :P > > On 1/15/13 6:22 AM, "Michal Mocny" <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: > > >Thanks for coordinating schedules Brain. Im quite glad to be on EST :) > > > >We should also establish a medium: Google hangouts were not well received > >by everyone last year, (not everyone had a G+ account), but I cannot think > >of anything that is nearly as convenient. Suggestions? > > > >-Michal > > > > > >On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Becky Gibson > ><gibson.be...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> Am I correct in assuming US pacific time zone? > >> > >> Sent from my iPad > >> > >> On Jan 15, 2013, at 4:36 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > >> > >> > Works for me, however, to accommodate EU community we must to consider > >> > times unholy. This is Apache Way from what I understand. > >> > > >> > I created a form to help us pick a time to talk. > >> > > >> > http://goo.gl/h9d1a > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> > >> wrote: > >> >> Okay gentlemen, I think there have been countless good points made > >>from > >> all > >> >> parties, but also some bike-shedding. > >> >> > >> >> Perhaps it is time to schedule some face-time to better articulate > >>some > >> of > >> >> the finer points, and to help come to some consensus? > >> >> > >> >> -Michal > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarc...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Sorry if this got asked before, but does a feature branch get > >>deleted > >> >>> after it is merged? Just wondering about branch clutter over a long > >> period, > >> >>> or if this is just the same as a topic branch using today's > >>committer > >> >>> workflow. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On 1/14/2013 5:34 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> You work on a Feature branch. It gets rolled into Dev as needed so > >> >>>> others can merge / collaborate on said feature. When it feels right > >> >>>> instead of merging a large set of potentially breaking commits to > >> >>>> Unstable the dev working on said feature just merges that feature. > >> >>>> This would require more responsibility for the committer to keep > >>track > >> >>>> of their feature branches which I could see as being more overhead. > >> >>> > >> > >
