4.0 and let's move on. It's just a number, and is a minor point in the end.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > Should we consider jumping to 13? You know... just prefix a 1 onto the > existing number. > > .... > > 4.0 (or any other number) is great by me! > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) < > panar...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > 4.0 is also good. Should we tag and start a vote for that ? > > Sorry for asking about vote again, but I want to ensure that the issues > > that Sergey fixed in the CLI/Lib are impacting some folks and I hope this > > release could help them fast. > > > > On 10/10/14, 10:17 AM, "Victor Sosa" <sosah.vic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >lol... I like that :P > > > > > >2014-10-10 12:09 GMT-05:00 Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com>: > > > > > >> On Oct 10, 2014 10:05 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > OR we move to named releases externally. > > >> > > > >> > Cordova MX === 4.0 > > >> > > >> Cordova Mexico? > > >> > > >> > On Oct 10, 2014 10:03 AM, "Michal Mocny" <mmo...@chromium.org> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > 4 was also discussed as fine, and in isolation would have been our > > >> choice > > >> > > for sure -- but we worried that with the impending "cordova-4.0" > > >> releases, > > >> > > it would confuse users and not mark a clear departure from cadver. > > >> > > > > >> > > The more I think about it though, the less important I think that > > >>worry > > >> > > is. Maybe 4.0 is fine. > > >> > > > > >> > > (Apologies to Steve, who just wants to get this over with) > > >> > > > > >> > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > As is 4. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > This is more of an outreach, marketing, blogging, tweeting, etc > > >> problem. > > >> > > > Versions are for issue tracking not marketing. (Tho semver and > our > > >> > > > respective $BIGCO's confuse that to their and our continued > > >>strife.) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > (All IMO of course, happy to follow the wisdom of the crowd on > > >>this > > >> one.) > > >> > > > On Oct 10, 2014 9:29 AM, "Michal Mocny" <mmo...@chromium.org> > > >>wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > 5 is also fine. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> > > >>wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I am against it. Its not going to achieve the goal of > > >>alleviating > > >> > > > > > confusion. People see the CLI as the version not the > > >>platforms. > > >> I'd > > >> > > > > rather > > >> > > > > > we went to 5 if anything. > > >> > > > > > On Oct 9, 2014 3:56 PM, "Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN > > >>TECH)" < > > >> > > > > > panar...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I meant tag and start the vote for the next release :) > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 10/9/14, 3:01 PM, "Chuck Lantz" <cla...@microsoft.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >+1 > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >-Chuck > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >> > > > > > > >From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabb...@gmail.com] > > >> > > > > > > >Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 2:55 PM > > >> > > > > > > >To: dev@cordova.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > >Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >+1 to not voting ;) , it implies we will wait 72 hours > > >>before > > >> > > moving > > >> > > > > on. > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >How about if anyone is completely against 10.0.0 they > > >>voice it > > >> > > here, > > >> > > > > in > > >> > > > > > > >the next couple hours, otherwise we move forward. > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >@purplecabbage > > >> > > > > > > >risingj.com > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Steven Gill < > > >> > > stevengil...@gmail.com > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> I don't think a vote is necessary. I'd hate to see us > > >>resort > > >> to > > >> > > > > voting > > >> > > > > > > >> to solve problems. Voting should be a last resort if > > >> consensus > > >> > > is > > >> > > > > > > >> split. I don't see that in this scenario. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> I propose we bumb the version up to 10.0.0. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Parashuram Narasimhan > (MS > > >> OPEN > > >> > > > > TECH) < > > >> > > > > > > >> panar...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > Lets start with a vote for 10.0.0 ? And if someone > > >>feels > > >> > > > strongly > > >> > > > > > > >> > about calling it something the vote could be > cancelled > > >>!! > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > On 10/9/14, 2:41 PM, "Chuck Lantz" > > >><cla...@microsoft.com> > > >> > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Yeah agreed - Vladimir squashed the bug and what was > > >>at > > >> once > > >> > > > > point > > >> > > > > > > >> > >to be called 3.7.0 has been mainly waiting on a > > >>version > > >> > > number. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Personally I am fine with 10.0.0 or 5.0.0 - Either > > >>send > > >> the > > >> > > > > message > > >> > > > > > > >> > >that platform versions are divorced from the CLI > from > > >>a > > >> > > > > versioning > > >> > > > > > > >> > >perspective (though behavior is still predictable). > > >>Leo > > >> - I > > >> > > > > think > > >> > > > > > > >> > >at least out of the gate devs will likely focus on > the > > >> CLI > > >> > > > > version > > >> > > > > > > >> > >as primary. Basically today, the cadence version of > > >>the > > >> CLI > > >> > > is > > >> > > > > > > >> > >what people talk about. Heck, Cordova > > >> > > > > > > >> > >3.4.1 was 3.4.0 for all platforms but iOS. The main > > >> message > > >> > > is > > >> > > > > > > >> > >that > > >> > > > > > > >> when > > >> > > > > > > >> > >you platform add android, you may see an npm pull > for > > >> > > > > > > >> > >cordova-android@4.3.2 and that is expected. It's > > just > > >> > > > > formalizing > > >> > > > > > > >> > >the message and allows independent platform rev'ing. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >-Chuck > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >-----Original Message----- > > >> > > > > > > >> > >From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com] > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 2:13 PM > > >> > > > > > > >> > >To: dev@cordova.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Cc: Michal Mocny; Marcel Kinard > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >I think vladimir fixed the bug. We just need to > > >>release > > >> now. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Only thing holding back the release now is consensus > > >>on > > >> the > > >> > > > > version > > >> > > > > > > >> > >of the cli. It seemed like most people were leaning > > >> toward > > >> > > > > 10.0.0. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Should I move forward with that? I would just have > to > > >> branch > > >> > > + > > >> > > > > pin > > >> > > > > > > >> > >deps > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Leo the documentation version dropdown box would be > > >>tied > > >> to > > >> > > cli > > >> > > > > > > >>version. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >It still makes sense to copy over platform > > >>documentation > > >> into > > >> > > > > > > >> > >platform repos and maybe copy it into docs during > > >> generation > > >> > > > > time. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >As for plugin pinning, plugins have more to do with > > >> > > platforms. > > >> > > > I > > >> > > > > > > >> wouldn't > > >> > > > > > > >> > >say they aren't tied to the cli at all. I understand > > >>your > > >> > > point > > >> > > > > > > >>though. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >So far, we haven't had any plugins that won't work > > >>with > > >> > > > previous > > >> > > > > > > >> versions > > >> > > > > > > >> > >(As far as I know). We should really fix the engine > > >>stuff > > >> for > > >> > > > > > > >> > >plugins so we can keep track of what platforms they > > >>work > > >> for. > > >> > > > I'd > > >> > > > > > > >> > >like us to give warnings to users to update their > > >>plugins > > >> if > > >> > > > > newer > > >> > > > > > > >>versions are out. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Cordova info should also dump what versions of > plugins > > >> you > > >> > > have > > >> > > > > > > >> installed > > >> > > > > > > >> > >if it doesn't already. In combination with cordova > > >>--save > > >> & > > >> > > > > cordova > > >> > > > > > > >> > >--restore, we should be able to recommend a workflow > > >>that > > >> is > > >> > > > > easily > > >> > > > > > > >> > >reproducible on any machine. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Chuck Lantz < > > >> > > > > cla...@microsoft.com> > > >> > > > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Okay - so - there's a pretty nasty CLI blocker bug > > >> right > > >> > > now. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Plugins with dependencies don't install (this > > >>affects > > >> all > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> platforms). In my opinion, we need to get a CLI > > >> release > > >> > > out > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> really soon. Are we closed on this topic, or do > we > > >> need to > > >> > > > > look > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> at doing the old process to get this out the door > > >>while > > >> we > > >> > > > are > > >> > > > > > > >>still talking? > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> There are also a series of other bugs in the > > >>currently > > >> > > tagged > > >> > > > > > > >>"3.6.4" > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> platforms for Android, Windows, and Windows Phone > 8. > > >> These > > >> > > > can > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> be handled independently, but the CLI bug can't. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-7670 > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> -Chuck > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> From: Treggiari, Leo > > >>[mailto:leo.treggi...@intel.com] > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 12:23 PM > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> To: Michal Mocny > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Cc: Marcel Kinard; dev > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Subject: RE: Independent platform release summary > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> I'll have to admit that this seems a bit weird. > > >>That > > >> is, > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> independent versions of the CLI and platforms, > with > > >>a > > >> > > > "Cordova > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> release" named "something" - e.g. a date? > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Imagine a user wants to know whether the new > > >>whitelist > > >> > > entry > > >> > > > in > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> config.xml is supported in the versions of CLI and > > >> > > platforms > > >> > > > > that > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> they have - assuming they understand the > distinction > > >> > > between > > >> > > > > the > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> CLI and platforms to begin with. They use some > > >>command > > >> to > > >> > > > list > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> the versions of the "things" (CLI and > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> platforms) they have installed. They go to the > > >> individual > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> documentation of the "things" and try to figure it > > >>out. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> The way the Cordova documentation works today is > > >>nice > > >> with > > >> > > > the > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> combo box where I can select a Cordova version - > > >>3.6.0, > > >> > > > 3.5.0, > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> ... What would the combo box contain in the new > > >> versioning > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> scheme and how many entries would there be? Are > the > > >> > > answers > > >> > > > > > > >>"dates" and "lots of dates"? > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Or would there be no Cordova version documentation > > >> other > > >> > > than > > >> > > > > an > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> explanation of how to get the list of "things" you > > >> > > currently > > >> > > > > have > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> and where to find the documentation on them. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> To "pin" or not to "pin. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Note that, to me, the pinning choice defines what > > >> happens > > >> > > > when > > >> > > > > I > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>use "cordova {plugin | platform} add foo" with no > > >> specific > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>version specified. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> I've understood, so far at least, that plugins are > > >>not > > >> > > pinned > > >> > > > > (an > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> add always fetches something) and platforms are > > >>pinned > > >> to a > > >> > > > CLI > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> version (an add tells the CLI that I will be using > > >>that > > >> > > > > platform > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> (already > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> installed) for this project). Everything I have > > >>read > > >> which > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> includes 1 book and the on-line project > > >>documentation, > > >> > > > suggest > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> that, even if not stating it explicitly. E.g. > > >>plugins > > >> talk > > >> > > > > about > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> "fetching" and platforms don't. There is a way to > > >> fetch a > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> specific version of platform support. That's good > > >>and > > >> if I > > >> > > > do > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> that it is up to me to understand the > compatibility > > >>of > > >> the > > >> > > > > > > >>specific version I requested. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Is this true? If so then the npm cordova behavior > > >> seems > > >> > > > weird. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> That is, if I "npm install cordova" I get a set of > > >> pinned > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> platforms. If I "npm update cordova", I get a new > > >>CLI > > >> and > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> nothing else - i.e. not the platforms that were > > >>pinned > > >> to > > >> > > > that > > >> > > > > > > >>version of the CLI? > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Should the plugin and platform 'pin' behavior be > the > > >> same? > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Should both be pinned? Some may find this > > >>alternative > > >> > > > > > > >>"blasphemous" > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> but the core plugin versions tested with a version > > >>of > > >> the > > >> > > CLI > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> could be pinned to the version of the CLI. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Should both not be pinned? It would be more > > >>consistent > > >> and > > >> > > > if > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> users are OK with plugins being unpinned, why not > > >> > > platforms? > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> But maybe plugins and platforms are different. > > >>Plugins > > >> are > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> purely run-time code. Platforms are primarily > > >>tooling > > >> with > > >> > > > > some > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> run-time > > >> > > > > > > >> code. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Does that difference make the current pinning > > >>behavior > > >> the > > >> > > > best > > >> > > > > > > >> choice. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Maybe, but personally I would prefer both to be > > >>pinned > > >> - > > >> > > > i.e. I > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> install a version of Cordova, and until I update > it, > > >> every > > >> > > > > time I > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> add a platform or 'core' plugin, I get the same > > >>thing. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Leo > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com > ] > > >>On > > >> > > Behalf > > >> > > > > Of > > >> > > > > > > >> Michal > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Mocny > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 1:47 PM > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> To: Treggiari, Leo > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Cc: Michal Mocny; Marcel Kinard; dev > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> With this direction, there is no single number. > > >>Users > > >> > > should > > >> > > > > not > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> functionally care about CLI version, so there will > > >>just > > >> be > > >> > > > the > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> platform versions that matter, really. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Downstreams can of course put labels on > > >>combinations of > > >> > > > > versions, > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> so "PhoneGap 4" may be Android 4, iOS 3.8, and > etc. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Treggiari, Leo > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> <leo.treggi...@intel.com <mailto: > > >> leo.treggi...@intel.com > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > Did I miss anything? > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> I don't think we closed on this (I had to leave > the > > >> > > meeting a > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> little > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> early) but a remaining question is how to version > > >>what > > >> we > > >> > > > (and > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> users) call "Cordova". Assuming a "Cordova" > > >>version is > > >> a > > >> > > > point > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> in time collection of the latest CLI version + > > >>platform > > >> > > > > versions > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> + plugin versions. Is the Cordova version semver > > >> (using > > >> > > what > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> algorithm with respect to its contained > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> components) or is that what you meant by ""latest > > >>as > > >> of > > >> > > Oct > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> 2014" or something". > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Thanks, > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Leo > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> From: mmo...@google.com<mailto:mmo...@google.com> > > >> [mailto: > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> mmo...@google.com<mailto:mmo...@google.com>] On > > >>Behalf > > >> Of > > >> > > > > Michal > > >> > > > > > > >> Mocny > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 1:13 PM > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> To: Michal Mocny > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Cc: Marcel Kinard; dev > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary > > >> Thanks > > >> > > > > everyone > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> for participation in what was a long and grueling > > >> > > discussion. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Summary of current proposal: > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - Cad-ver is dead. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - Everything moves Sem-ver, with platforms > > >>continuing > > >> from > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> current versions and diverging over time. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - CLI potentially gets a significant version bump > to > > >> > > showcase > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> this reset (to 5.0 or 10.0, not yet settled) > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - Pinning default platform versions *will* > continue > > >>for > > >> the > > >> > > > > time > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> being, but it will be trivial to override the > > >>default. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - Platforms will have CLI <engine> tag equivalent > > >> (unclear > > >> > > > yet > > >> > > > > if > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> as node peerDependency or otherwise) so devs will > > >>know > > >> when > > >> > > > > they > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> need to upgrade/downgrade CLI for non-default > > >>platform > > >> > > > > versions. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - After a platform update, eventually CLI will > > >>release > > >> to > > >> > > > "pin" > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> the new default, and bump its PATCH/MINOR version > > >> (unless > > >> > > CLI > > >> > > > > had > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> a functional update at same time that requires a > > >>larger > > >> > > > bump). > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - After you update CLI, your existing projects > don't > > >> > > change & > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> platform upgrades remain explicit, but you will > now > > >>get > > >> > > > > warnings > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> if your installed platforms are older than the CLI > > >> pinned > > >> > > > > > versions. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - Event MAJOR changes to platforms are not MAJOR > > >> updates to > > >> > > > the > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> CLI, unless there is an actual breaking change to > > >>the > > >> CLI > > >> > > > tool > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> (i.e. new CLI will no longer work with the > currently > > >> > > > installed > > >> > > > > > > >>platform). > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - Platform and CLI docs have to split out and be > > >> released & > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> versioned alongside each (like plugins). Cross > > >> references > > >> > > > from > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> one to the other will only be needed in a few > > >>places. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Note: The CLI-Platform compatibility story is > > >> functionally > > >> > > no > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>different than we have today. If you upgrade your > > >>CLI > > >> and > > >> > > > there > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>is a breaking change, you will have to re-create > > >>your > > >> > > > projects > > >> > > > > or > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>downgrade CLI again. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Now we plan to be more explicit about it and offer > > >> > > warnings. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Note: There is no concept of a "fancy-pants" > release > > >> other > > >> > > > than > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> to say "latest as of Oct 2014" or something. > > >>Platforms > > >> > > don't > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> have a single common set of functionality, so > CadVer > > >> was > > >> > > > > somewhat > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> misleading already in that sense. We could > > >>introduce a > > >> > > > concept > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> of "API Level" for exec bridge or something for > use > > >>by > > >> > > > plugins, > > >> > > > > > > >>but not sure that has value. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> What wasn't covered that came to mind after the > > >>fact: > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - When there is an update available for CLI, > should > > >>we > > >> > > give a > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> warning to update? (this is useful, but isn't > common > > >> for > > >> > > npm > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> modules. I think we already do this from plugman > > >>when > > >> you > > >> > > > try > > >> > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > >>publish plugins?). > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Did I miss anything? > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> -Michal > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Michal Mocny > > >> > > > > > > >> > >><mmo...@chromium.org<mailto: > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> mmo...@chromium.org>> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > External Public link for those that just want to > > >> > > > watch/chat: > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > https://plus.google.com/events/cm4l0vifcig920qkhpn5stqiet4 > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > Hangout link to join the conversation: > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/hoaevent/AP36tYcNwXEyet4Xv_23HiTl > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > 4I K0jsM4NlmGy5kbLsPIW3SnOsUEIQ?authuser=0&hl=en > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > See you in 30 minutes. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Michal Mocny > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > <mmo...@chromium.org > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> <mailto:mmo...@chromium.org>> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> +dev list again > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> Not everyone could make 1pm, not everyone could > > >>make > > >> > > 2pm. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> While I don't think we need a full 2 hours, I'm > > >> hoping > > >> > > to > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> start late and end early -- proving opportunity > > >> people > > >> > > to > > >> > > > > pop > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> in at either time and chime > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> in. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Marcel Kinard > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> <cmarc...@gmail.com<mailto:cmarc...@gmail.com > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> Is the expected duration 1 hour or 2 hours? > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> On Oct 8, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Michal Mocny > > >> > > > > > > >> > >><mmo...@chromium.org<mailto: > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> mmo...@chromium.org>> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > So it looks like Today 1-3 EST or Friday 1-3 > > >>EST > > >> are > > >> > > > the > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > best > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>times. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> I'm > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > going to start the ball rolling to do this > > >>TODAY, > > >> but > > >> > > > if > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > that proves > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> too > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > short notices we'll move it to Friday. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > I'll email out links to hangout at 12:30 or > > >>so, > > >> and > > >> > > I'm > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > hoping Steven > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> can > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > make it before 2pm since he's been most > active > > >> with > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > releases > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> recently. > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > -Michal > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > > > > > >> > >-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > >> > > dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > >> > >For additional commands, e-mail: > > >> dev-h...@cordova.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > > > > > >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > >> dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: > > >> dev-h...@cordova.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >>>?B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKC > > >>>B� > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >>>?�?[��X��ܚX�K??K[XZ[?�??]�][��X��ܚX�P?�ܙ?ݘK�\?X�?K�ܙ�B��܈?Y??]?[ۘ[??��[X > > >>>[� > > >> > > > > > > >?�??K[XZ[?�??]�Z?[???�ܙ?ݘK�\?X�?K�ܙ�B > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > >Victor Adrian Sosa Herrera > > >IBM Software Engineer > > >Guadalajara, Jalisco > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org > > >
