having dedicated endpoints for specific resources sounds more reasonable to me, than having a single endpoint for misc stuff. just my 2ct
On 19.05.2010, at 13:39, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 13:13, Robert Dionne > <dio...@dionne-associates.com> wrote: >> This sounds like a good approach, if I get the gist of it, it makes the >> replication state persistent. We also have a _users db now, is this a good >> time to think about consolidating and having one _system database ? > > I too like the proposal, but I'd also prefer a single _system db > rather than a bunch of specific databases. > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan
