I also tend to prefer having two separate DBs. For now, there are 2 specific resources (users and replications) but tomorrow we can have 3, 4, 5, etc.
However, a single _system DB would help with the max_open_dbs and _stats :) On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Simon Metson <simonmet...@googlemail.com>wrote: > +1 > > > On 19 May 2010, at 12:59, Sebastian Cohnen wrote: > > having dedicated endpoints for specific resources sounds more reasonable >> to me, than having a single endpoint for misc stuff. just my 2ct >> >> >> On 19.05.2010, at 13:39, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 13:13, Robert Dionne >>> <dio...@dionne-associates.com> wrote: >>> >>>> This sounds like a good approach, if I get the gist of it, it makes the >>>> replication state persistent. We also have a _users db now, is this a good >>>> time to think about consolidating and having one _system database ? >>>> >>> >>> I too like the proposal, but I'd also prefer a single _system db >>> rather than a bunch of specific databases. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Dirkjan >>> >> >> > -- Filipe David Manana, fdman...@gmail.com "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."