+1
On 19 May 2010, at 12:59, Sebastian Cohnen wrote:
having dedicated endpoints for specific resources sounds more
reasonable to me, than having a single endpoint for misc stuff. just
my 2ct
On 19.05.2010, at 13:39, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 13:13, Robert Dionne
<dio...@dionne-associates.com> wrote:
This sounds like a good approach, if I get the gist of it, it
makes the replication state persistent. We also have a _users db
now, is this a good time to think about consolidating and having
one _system database ?
I too like the proposal, but I'd also prefer a single _system db
rather than a bunch of specific databases.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
