On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Andy Wenk <a...@nms.de> wrote: > On 5 February 2014 11:08, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > I agree. > > > > > > If erlang@ becomes the place where newbie questions about Erlang go > > > ignored, we should can the list. > > > > > > > It's already some months since its creation without much activity. > > > > > > > You requested examples: > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-marketing/ > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-marketing/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Andy, how about two review dates? Six months, and then 12 months. > > > > > > Let's review *all* lists on these dates. > > > > > > > I don't see these mls having a big traffic.The case of openoffice due to > > its background should be put apart imo but fair enough. > > > > I see you already decided to go on this ml with some others people, so > > there is no reason to continue any discussion on that topic anyway, and I > > will see how i can eventually continue to help on the advocacy side. > > > > - benoit > > > > Benoit, > > I think the approach to start "now" and see how the usage will be in some > months with "all" lists is feasible and easy to go with. Let's then make a > review and decide wether a list should exist further or not. > > This is how I understood it, yes.
- benoit
