+1  

On Tuesday, 4 February 2014 at 11:00, Noah Slater wrote:

> I agree.
> 
> If erlang@ becomes the place where newbie questions about Erlang go
> ignored, we should can the list.
> 
> You requested examples:
> 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-marketing/
> 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-marketing/
> 
> Andy, how about two review dates? Six months, and then 12 months.
> 
> Let's review *all* lists on these dates.
> 
> On 4 February 2014 11:52, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Nick, I don't think you are filibustering. You raise a good point that
> > > has not come up yet.
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > actually I already raised it. And took the Erlang ml as an example of a
> > very little traffic list. The advocacy list on postgresql, is also very
> > little used. Even it was created 10 years ago.
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Namely: what do we consider to be the success criteria of mailing
> > > lists? And perhaps more importantly: what are the failure criteria?
> > > 
> > > Here's my attempt at answering those questions.
> > > 
> > > Success criteria:
> > > 
> > > - The mailing lists are occasionally used, and when questions are
> > > posted there, replies are received.
> > > - People who might not otherwise have been active start to become active.
> > > 
> > > Failure criteria:
> > > 
> > > - Mails posted to the list go unread/un-responded to.
> > > - Something important for the whole community was missed because it
> > > was happening away from the dev@ list.
> > > 
> > 
> > These are good points that actually can be applied to this erlang list. It
> > is too soon to say the same for the others though.
> > 
> > Anyway, This is why I think it's important to see what happen in other
> > projects so we can anticipate what could happen. At least try to
> > anticipate. Anticipation and planning are generally a good way to minimize
> > failures. I mentionned some.
> > 
> > - benoit
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Noah Slater
> https://twitter.com/nslater
> 
> 


Reply via email to