Nice work, thanks for doing this.
On Dec 29, 2016 8:41 PM, "Sijie Guo" <si...@apache.org> wrote: I've merged all the pull requests that need to be included in 0.4.0 (and both Jenkins and CI builds are green now). Also I moved inactive jiras to 0.5.0. There are a few issues remaining - https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D% 20DL%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersio n%20%3D%200.4.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC Most of them already have pull requests (but need to be rebased to latest master). So I can merge them. Hopefully I will be able to cut 0.4.0 release in following few days. - Sijie On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > I will start check the jiras that need to be included in 0.4.0 release at > the weekend. If there is any jiras that need to be included in 0.4.0, > please comment in the jira. > > - Sijie > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > >> FYI. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-81 is created for tracking >> building the process. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13024 and >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13023 for setting the dists >> for DL. >> >> - Sijie >> >> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Thank you for all the feedbacks. I will drive the release for this >>> version. So that we can have all the procedures documented in the wiki. >>> >>> I created the wiki page here for documenting the procedure: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DL/Pr >>> eparing+DistributedLog+Releases >>> >>> - Sijie >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> Great to know the commitment of merge twitter's branch. Looking forward >>>> to >>>> see bookkeeper 4.5. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > It does make sense, Sijie, thanks for the update. >>>> > >>>> > -Flavio >>>> > >>>> > > On 17 Nov 2016, at 05:12, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > Flavio, >>>> > > >>>> > > I totally agreed that not using an official Apache version is not >>>> great >>>> > > for the community. We had a bookkeeper meetup last night. We've >>>> discussed >>>> > > the current situation with the community. We came to a commitment to >>>> > merge >>>> > > Twitter's branch back into bookkeeper 4.5. After that we won't >>>> maintain >>>> > our >>>> > > own branch and switch to 4.5. >>>> > > >>>> > > Hope this make sense. >>>> > > >>>> > > Sijie >>>> > > >>>> > > On Nov 16, 2016 8:04 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <f...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > It isn't great that DistributedLog is not using the Apache >>>> BookKeeper >>>> > > release. Essentially anyone using DistributedLog today needs to use >>>> the >>>> > > Twitter branch of BookKeeper, which has diverged from Apache >>>> BookKeeper. >>>> > > I'm sure the changes in the Twitter branch are all great, but I'd >>>> be more >>>> > > comfortable being able to rely on the Apache BookKeeper releases, >>>> which >>>> > are >>>> > > community driven. >>>> > > >>>> > > I'm not going to block the release on this alone because it is >>>> important >>>> > > for this project to get a first release out soon, but we need to fix >>>> > DL-2. >>>> > > >>>> > > -Flavio >>>> > > >>>> > >> On 15 Nov 2016, at 19:02, Leigh Stewart >>>> <lstew...@twitter.com.INVALID> >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > >> >>>> > >> +1 >>>> > >> >>>> > >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Franck Cuny < >>>> franck.c...@gmail.com> >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > >> >>>> > >>> +1 and I agree to not make DL-2 a blocker. >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Xi Liu <xi.liu....@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>>> +1 especially on DL-23. >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> - Xi >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Khurrum Nasim < >>>> > khurrumnas...@gmail.com> >>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> I am also interested in participating. >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> - kn >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>>> I'd like to start the discussion about the first release. >>>> There are >>>> > >>>>> still a >>>> > >>>>>> few discussions and pull requests outstanding. I think we need >>>> to >>>> > >>> pick >>>> > >>>>> up a >>>> > >>>>>> few items and cut the first release and then iterate from >>>> there. >>>> > Here >>>> > >>>> is >>>> > >>>>> a >>>> > >>>>>> list of items that I think we should include: >>>> > >>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>> - DL-4 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-4>: >>>> Repackaging >>>> > >>>>> namespace >>>> > >>>>>> to org.apache (the pull request is out and under reviewing) >>>> > >>>>>> - DL-49 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-49>: support >>>> > scala >>>> > >>>>> 2.10 >>>> > >>>>>> and 2.11 (the review is done, need to be merged) >>>> > >>>>>> - DL-23 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-23>: Move >>>> DL to >>>> > >>>> depend >>>> > >>>>>> on >>>> > >>>>>> central maven repo. The main blocker is about the libthrift >>>> version, >>>> > >>>>> which >>>> > >>>>>> is only hosted at twtter's maven repo. There is a pull request >>>> out. >>>> > >>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>> I am kind of thinking to not make DL-2 >>>> > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-2> (using the >>>> official >>>> > >>>>>> bookkeeper >>>> > >>>>>> version) the blocker for the first release. We can cut a new >>>> release >>>> > >>>> once >>>> > >>>>>> that change is ready. So to decouple the release procedure >>>> between >>>> > DL >>>> > >>>> and >>>> > >>>>>> BK. >>>> > >>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>> Please feel free to add any jiras that you believe it should be >>>> > >>>> included >>>> > >>>>> in >>>> > >>>>>> the first release. >>>> > >>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>> Also, is there anyone interested in being the release manager >>>> for >>>> > >>> first >>>> > >>>>>> release? >>>> > >>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>> - Sijie >>>> > >>>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> -- >>>> > >>> -franck >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >> >
