The conflicted DL-167 change has been rebased, please help to review :)
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > FYI. I merged the repackage script and repackage the namespace under > org.apache.distributedlog. All the changes for 0.4.0 are merged (except one > test case change - waiting for Liang's response). Ready to cut the first > release candidate. > > - Sijie > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I've merged all the pull requests that need to be included in 0.4.0 (and >> both Jenkins and CI builds are green now). Also I moved inactive jiras to >> 0.5.0. >> >> There are a few issues remaining - https://issues.apache.org/ >> jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DL%20AND%20resolution%20% >> 3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0% >> 20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >> >> Most of them already have pull requests (but need to be rebased to latest >> master). So I can merge them. >> >> Hopefully I will be able to cut 0.4.0 release in following few days. >> >> - Sijie >> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> I will start check the jiras that need to be included in 0.4.0 release at >>> the weekend. If there is any jiras that need to be included in 0.4.0, >>> please comment in the jira. >>> >>> - Sijie >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> FYI. >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-81 is created for tracking >>>> building the process. >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13024 and >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13023 for setting the dists >>>> for DL. >>>> >>>> - Sijie >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thank you for all the feedbacks. I will drive the release for this >>>>> version. So that we can have all the procedures documented in the wiki. >>>>> >>>>> I created the wiki page here for documenting the procedure: >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DL/Pr >>>>> eparing+DistributedLog+Releases >>>>> >>>>> - Sijie >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> Great to know the commitment of merge twitter's branch. Looking >>>>>> forward to >>>>>> see bookkeeper 4.5. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > It does make sense, Sijie, thanks for the update. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > -Flavio >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > On 17 Nov 2016, at 05:12, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > Flavio, >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > I totally agreed that not using an official Apache version is not >>>>>> great >>>>>> > > for the community. We had a bookkeeper meetup last night. We've >>>>>> discussed >>>>>> > > the current situation with the community. We came to a commitment >>>>>> to >>>>>> > merge >>>>>> > > Twitter's branch back into bookkeeper 4.5. After that we won't >>>>>> maintain >>>>>> > our >>>>>> > > own branch and switch to 4.5. >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > Hope this make sense. >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > Sijie >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > On Nov 16, 2016 8:04 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <f...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > It isn't great that DistributedLog is not using the Apache >>>>>> BookKeeper >>>>>> > > release. Essentially anyone using DistributedLog today needs to >>>>>> use the >>>>>> > > Twitter branch of BookKeeper, which has diverged from Apache >>>>>> BookKeeper. >>>>>> > > I'm sure the changes in the Twitter branch are all great, but I'd >>>>>> be more >>>>>> > > comfortable being able to rely on the Apache BookKeeper releases, >>>>>> which >>>>>> > are >>>>>> > > community driven. >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > I'm not going to block the release on this alone because it is >>>>>> important >>>>>> > > for this project to get a first release out soon, but we need to >>>>>> fix >>>>>> > DL-2. >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > -Flavio >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >> On 15 Nov 2016, at 19:02, Leigh Stewart >>>>>> <lstew...@twitter.com.INVALID> >>>>>> > > wrote: >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> +1 >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Franck Cuny < >>>>>> franck.c...@gmail.com> >>>>>> > > wrote: >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >>> +1 and I agree to not make DL-2 a blocker. >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Xi Liu <xi.liu....@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> > >>>> +1 especially on DL-23. >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> - Xi >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Khurrum Nasim < >>>>>> > khurrumnas...@gmail.com> >>>>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>> I am also interested in participating. >>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>> - kn >>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'd like to start the discussion about the first release. >>>>>> There are >>>>>> > >>>>> still a >>>>>> > >>>>>> few discussions and pull requests outstanding. I think we >>>>>> need to >>>>>> > >>> pick >>>>>> > >>>>> up a >>>>>> > >>>>>> few items and cut the first release and then iterate from >>>>>> there. >>>>>> > Here >>>>>> > >>>> is >>>>>> > >>>>> a >>>>>> > >>>>>> list of items that I think we should include: >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-4 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-4>: >>>>>> Repackaging >>>>>> > >>>>> namespace >>>>>> > >>>>>> to org.apache (the pull request is out and under reviewing) >>>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-49 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-49>: >>>>>> support >>>>>> > scala >>>>>> > >>>>> 2.10 >>>>>> > >>>>>> and 2.11 (the review is done, need to be merged) >>>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-23 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-23>: Move >>>>>> DL to >>>>>> > >>>> depend >>>>>> > >>>>>> on >>>>>> > >>>>>> central maven repo. The main blocker is about the libthrift >>>>>> version, >>>>>> > >>>>> which >>>>>> > >>>>>> is only hosted at twtter's maven repo. There is a pull >>>>>> request out. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> I am kind of thinking to not make DL-2 >>>>>> > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-2> (using the >>>>>> official >>>>>> > >>>>>> bookkeeper >>>>>> > >>>>>> version) the blocker for the first release. We can cut a new >>>>>> release >>>>>> > >>>> once >>>>>> > >>>>>> that change is ready. So to decouple the release procedure >>>>>> between >>>>>> > DL >>>>>> > >>>> and >>>>>> > >>>>>> BK. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please feel free to add any jiras that you believe it should >>>>>> be >>>>>> > >>>> included >>>>>> > >>>>> in >>>>>> > >>>>>> the first release. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> Also, is there anyone interested in being the release manager >>>>>> for >>>>>> > >>> first >>>>>> > >>>>>> release? >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> - Sijie >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> > >>> -- >>>>>> > >>> -franck >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
