FYI. I merged the repackage script and repackage the namespace under org.apache.distributedlog. All the changes for 0.4.0 are merged (except one test case change - waiting for Liang's response). Ready to cut the first release candidate.
- Sijie On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > I've merged all the pull requests that need to be included in 0.4.0 (and > both Jenkins and CI builds are green now). Also I moved inactive jiras to > 0.5.0. > > There are a few issues remaining - https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DL%20AND%20resolution%20% > 3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4.0% > 20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > Most of them already have pull requests (but need to be rebased to latest > master). So I can merge them. > > Hopefully I will be able to cut 0.4.0 release in following few days. > > - Sijie > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I will start check the jiras that need to be included in 0.4.0 release at >> the weekend. If there is any jiras that need to be included in 0.4.0, >> please comment in the jira. >> >> - Sijie >> >> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> FYI. >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-81 is created for tracking >>> building the process. >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13024 and >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13023 for setting the dists >>> for DL. >>> >>> - Sijie >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Thank you for all the feedbacks. I will drive the release for this >>>> version. So that we can have all the procedures documented in the wiki. >>>> >>>> I created the wiki page here for documenting the procedure: >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DL/Pr >>>> eparing+DistributedLog+Releases >>>> >>>> - Sijie >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> Great to know the commitment of merge twitter's branch. Looking >>>>> forward to >>>>> see bookkeeper 4.5. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > It does make sense, Sijie, thanks for the update. >>>>> > >>>>> > -Flavio >>>>> > >>>>> > > On 17 Nov 2016, at 05:12, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Flavio, >>>>> > > >>>>> > > I totally agreed that not using an official Apache version is not >>>>> great >>>>> > > for the community. We had a bookkeeper meetup last night. We've >>>>> discussed >>>>> > > the current situation with the community. We came to a commitment >>>>> to >>>>> > merge >>>>> > > Twitter's branch back into bookkeeper 4.5. After that we won't >>>>> maintain >>>>> > our >>>>> > > own branch and switch to 4.5. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Hope this make sense. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Sijie >>>>> > > >>>>> > > On Nov 16, 2016 8:04 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <f...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > > >>>>> > > It isn't great that DistributedLog is not using the Apache >>>>> BookKeeper >>>>> > > release. Essentially anyone using DistributedLog today needs to >>>>> use the >>>>> > > Twitter branch of BookKeeper, which has diverged from Apache >>>>> BookKeeper. >>>>> > > I'm sure the changes in the Twitter branch are all great, but I'd >>>>> be more >>>>> > > comfortable being able to rely on the Apache BookKeeper releases, >>>>> which >>>>> > are >>>>> > > community driven. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > I'm not going to block the release on this alone because it is >>>>> important >>>>> > > for this project to get a first release out soon, but we need to >>>>> fix >>>>> > DL-2. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > -Flavio >>>>> > > >>>>> > >> On 15 Nov 2016, at 19:02, Leigh Stewart >>>>> <lstew...@twitter.com.INVALID> >>>>> > > wrote: >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> +1 >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Franck Cuny < >>>>> franck.c...@gmail.com> >>>>> > > wrote: >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >>> +1 and I agree to not make DL-2 a blocker. >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Xi Liu <xi.liu....@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>>> +1 especially on DL-23. >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> - Xi >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Khurrum Nasim < >>>>> > khurrumnas...@gmail.com> >>>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> I am also interested in participating. >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> - kn >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>> I'd like to start the discussion about the first release. >>>>> There are >>>>> > >>>>> still a >>>>> > >>>>>> few discussions and pull requests outstanding. I think we >>>>> need to >>>>> > >>> pick >>>>> > >>>>> up a >>>>> > >>>>>> few items and cut the first release and then iterate from >>>>> there. >>>>> > Here >>>>> > >>>> is >>>>> > >>>>> a >>>>> > >>>>>> list of items that I think we should include: >>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-4 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-4>: >>>>> Repackaging >>>>> > >>>>> namespace >>>>> > >>>>>> to org.apache (the pull request is out and under reviewing) >>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-49 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-49>: >>>>> support >>>>> > scala >>>>> > >>>>> 2.10 >>>>> > >>>>>> and 2.11 (the review is done, need to be merged) >>>>> > >>>>>> - DL-23 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-23>: Move >>>>> DL to >>>>> > >>>> depend >>>>> > >>>>>> on >>>>> > >>>>>> central maven repo. The main blocker is about the libthrift >>>>> version, >>>>> > >>>>> which >>>>> > >>>>>> is only hosted at twtter's maven repo. There is a pull >>>>> request out. >>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>> I am kind of thinking to not make DL-2 >>>>> > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DL-2> (using the >>>>> official >>>>> > >>>>>> bookkeeper >>>>> > >>>>>> version) the blocker for the first release. We can cut a new >>>>> release >>>>> > >>>> once >>>>> > >>>>>> that change is ready. So to decouple the release procedure >>>>> between >>>>> > DL >>>>> > >>>> and >>>>> > >>>>>> BK. >>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>> Please feel free to add any jiras that you believe it should >>>>> be >>>>> > >>>> included >>>>> > >>>>> in >>>>> > >>>>>> the first release. >>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>> Also, is there anyone interested in being the release manager >>>>> for >>>>> > >>> first >>>>> > >>>>>> release? >>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>> - Sijie >>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> -- >>>>> > >>> -franck >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
