Hi *, On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:05:22AM -0400, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 11:43 +0200, Frank Peters wrote: > > G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > > There seems to be some problems with the current DevGuide that are > > > political and proprietary in nature. Sun produces this guide. While this > > > > can you please elaborate? What kind of problems? > > Are you sure you want to know?
If you want people to work on a replacement, don't you think these people should know why to write that replacement? > I do not think the reasons need be > discussed on this list. They have been discussed on another list and the > result is this request to start preparing an OpenOffice.org Dev Guide. What other list? > > > guide has a five year head start, it seems to me that we might be able > > > to create an acceptable guide and avoid the nonsense. > > > > What do you mean by "nonsense"? > > Off list if you want details. Why off list? You apparently complain about the DevGuide being not "free open source" as in some definitions, but you yourself don't want to discuss this openly? That's nonsense. > [...] > Have I said it would be easy? No. What I ask is that the idea be > examined. Your comments are part of that evaluation process. Why should anybody consider starting over? Name the problems with the current devguide and maybe it is worth thinking about it. But honestly, I for myself think that this would be a big waste of time. ciao Christian -- NP: Helloween - Initiation --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
