On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 21:16 +0100, Laurent Godard wrote: > HI Ain, Hi gerry > > i totally agree !! > > Avery, regarding labels, is in the same position as MS regarding office > file format (well, thats less and less true, ans so will become for avery) > > So, if you want to charge for being present in OOo, yes ask money to Ms, > but also Adobe for PDF export or others for GIF exports
These two latter examples are a bit off the mark as Adbode and Compuserv (?) have both released there specs so they have contributed. > > i totally agree with christian that OOo has to benefit to end-users. So > having Avery labels predefined is good (as having MSO support or PDF > export). The important thing is to be able to add other label > definitions. And it is ! Even with an extension which is really simple > to define Good idea. Any idea on how to start creating such an extension? I am willing to try if there is some sort of example. > > i totally second christian that we do not have to charge for being > present in OOo. I will 'perharps' give some early money but will be the > end of the project. > I wasn't thinking of invoicing, if that is what you are thinking. What I was suggesting is that monetary contributions are something that could be done to warrant the exposure. -- G. Roderick Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
