Ok, it looks like we have a candidate list (we actually got 11 since there was a three-way tie for ninth place):
VectorArrowhoneycombHerringbonejoistV2Pietcolbufbatonimpulsevictor Next we need to do trademark searches on each of these to see whether we're likely to have success. I've moved candidates to a second tab: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q6UqluW6SLuMKRwW2TBGBzHfYLlXYm37eKJlIxWQGQM/edit#gid=304381532 Anybody want to give a hand in analyzing potential conflicts? -- Jacques Nadeau CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> wrote: > Everybody should pick their ten favorites using the numbers 1 to 10. > > 10 is most preferred > > > > -- > Jacques Nadeau > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Single vote for most preferred? >> >> Single transferable vote? >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Given that a bunch of people added names to the sheet, I'll take that as >>> tacit agreement to the proposed process. >>> >>> Let's move to the first vote phase. I've added a column for everybody's >>> votes. Let's try to wrap up the vote by 10am on Wednesday. >>> >>> thanks! >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jacques Nadeau >>> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey Guys, >>>> >>>> It sounds like we need to do a little more work on the Vector proposal >>>> before the board would like to consider it. The main point of contention >>>> right now is the name of the project. We need to decide on a name and >>>> get >>>> it signed off through PODLINGNAMESEARCH. >>>> >>>> Naming is extremely subjective so I'd like to propose a process for >>>> selection that minimizes pain. This is an initial proposal and >>>> >>>> We do the naming in the following steps >>>> - 1: Collect a set of names to be considered >>>> - 2: Run a vote for 2 days where each member ranks their top 10 options >>>> 1..10 >>>> - 3: Take the top ten vote getters and do a basic analysis of whether we >>>> think that any have legal issues. Keep dropping names that have this >>>> until >>>> we get with 10 reasonably solid candidate names >>>> - 5: Take the top ten names and give people 48 hours to rank their top 3 >>>> names >>>> - 6: Start a PODLINGNAMESEARCH on the top rank one, if that doesn't >>>> work, >>>> try the second and third options. >>>> >>>> I suggest we take name suggestions for step 1 from everyone but then >>>> constrain the voting to the newly proposed project [1]. We could just do >>>> this in a private email thread but I think doing it on Drill dev is >>>> better >>>> in the interest of transparency. This isn't the perfect place for that >>>> but >>>> I'm not sure a better place exists. >>>> >>>> I'm up for changing any or all of this depending on what others think. >>>> Just >>>> wanted to get the ball rolling on a proposed process. >>>> >>>> If this works, I've posted a doc at [2] that we can use for step 1. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> [1] List of proposed new project members/voters: Todd Lipcon, Ted >>>> Dunning, >>>> Michael Stack, P. Taylor Goetz, Julian Hyde, Julien Le Dem, Jacques >>>> Nadeau, >>>> James Taylor, Jake Luciani, Parth Chandra, Alex Levenson, Marcel >>>> Kornacker, >>>> Steven Phillips, Hanifi Gunes, Wes McKinney, Jason Altekruse, David >>>> Alves, >>>> Zain Asgar, Ippokratis Pandis, Abdel Hakim Deneche, Reynold Xin. >>>> [2] >>>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q6UqluW6SLuMKRwW2TBGBzHfYLlXYm37eKJlIxWQGQM/edit#gid=0 >>>> >>> >>> >> >
