I got clean regression runs as well. I've merged the patch. Jason, you want to start the release process?
-- Jacques Nadeau CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Abhishek Girish <agir...@mapr.com> wrote: > Had two clean Functional runs. TPC-H SF100 was also successful. > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:07 PM, rahul challapalli < > challapallira...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Kicked off a functional run with your branch. Will let you know once it > > finishes > > > > - Rahul > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> > > wrote: > > > > > 4196 was merged today. I have an updated patch for 4291 that is ready. > > > Unfortunately, it seems that something isn't working with our extended > > > tests so I haven't been able to run an extended regression. Unit tests > > > pass. Is someone else possibly able to run a regression suite against > > this > > > branch [1] so we can confirm things look good and start the release > > > process? > > > > > > thanks, > > > Jacques > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/jacques-n/drill/tree/DRILL-4291v2 > > > > > > -- > > > Jacques Nadeau > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I think the main things are 4196 and 4291 should be completed. I know > > > Amit > > > > was able to reproduce 4196 locally this weekend so I think we're > close > > on > > > > that. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jacques Nadeau > > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Zelaine Fong <zf...@maprtech.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Any updates on this? What's blocking us from taking this to a vote > -- > > > the > > > >> sort merge join issues? > > > >> > > > >> -- Zelaine > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Bumping this thread... > > > >> > > > > >> > Here are the issues that were mentioned in this thread along with > a > > > >> > proposed categorization: > > > >> > > > > >> > Release Blockers > > > >> > In-progress Amit https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4190 > > > >> > In-progress Amit https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4196 > > > >> > Ready to merge Jacques > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4246 > > > >> > In-review Jinfeng > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4256 > > > >> > In-progress Jacques > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4278 > > > >> > Ready to merge Laurent > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4285 > > > >> > Nice to Have > > > >> > Open Jason/Hakim https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4247 > > > >> > In-progress Jason > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4203 > > > >> > Open Jacques https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4266 > > > >> > Ready to merge Jacques > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4131 > > > >> > > > > >> > What do others think? Let's try to get the blockers wrapped up in > > the > > > >> next > > > >> > day or two and start a release vote... > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > Jacques Nadeau > > > >> > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > > >> > > > > >> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Jason Altekruse < > > > >> altekruseja...@gmail.com> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Hello All, > > > >> > > > > > >> > > With the allocator changes merged and about a month since the > last > > > >> > release > > > >> > > I think it would be good to start a vote soon. I would like to > > > >> volunteer > > > >> > to > > > >> > > be release manager. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > I know that there were some issues that were identified after > the > > > >> > transfer > > > >> > > patch was merged. I think that these issues should be fixed > before > > > we > > > >> > cut a > > > >> > > release candidate. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > From looking at the associated JIRAs it looked like there was a > > > >> possible > > > >> > > short term fix just adjusting the max_query_memory_per_node > > option, > > > >> and > > > >> > > some more involved work to change how we determine the correct > > time > > > to > > > >> > > spill during external sort. I believe it makes sense to make > > > external > > > >> > sort > > > >> > > work well with the newly improved memory accounting before > > cutting a > > > >> > > release, but I'm not sure how much work is left to be done > there. > > > [1] > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Please respond with your thoughts on a release soon and any > JIRAs > > > you > > > >> > would > > > >> > > like to include in the release. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4243 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > > >> > > Jason > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
