Hi Aman, This is the failure that he was seeing. He figured out that the new exclusions in jdbc-all were not being respected when the build was run with an older Maven version, causing the jar size to increase significantly. He added an enforcer to make sure the JAR didn't grow unexpectedly. Can you try to update your maven version and re-run the build?
- Jason On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Aman Sinha <asi...@maprtech.com> wrote: > Jacques, I am getting the following build failure on the latest master > branch...is this what you saw for the Apache build ? My mvn version output > is shown below. Should we all be upgrading to a newer mvn ? > > > [INFO] --- maven-enforcer-plugin:1.3.1:enforce > (enforce-jdbc-jar-compactness) @ drill-jdbc-all --- > [WARNING] Rule 0: org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.RequireFilesSize failed > with message: > The file drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar is outside the expected size > range. > > This is likely due to you adding new dependencies to a > java-exec and not updating the excludes in this module. This is important > as it minimizes the size of the dependency of Drill application users. > > /Users/asinha/incubator-drill/exec/jdbc-all/target/drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar > size (44664121) too large. Max. is > > 20000000/Users/asinha/incubator-drill/exec/jdbc-all/target/drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar > > > Administrators-MacBook-Pro-144:incubator-drill asinha$ mvn --version > Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19 > 05:51:28-0800) > Maven home: /opt/local/share/java/maven3 > Java version: 1.7.0_45, vendor: Oracle Corporation > Java home: > /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_45.jdk/Contents/Home/jre > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 > OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.9.5", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac" > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> > wrote: > > > Build back to normal. It looks like the Apache server was using an old > > version of Maven. Once I switched to something more recent, the build > > passed. > > > > -- > > Jacques Nadeau > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hmm... this merge caused the Apache build to fail. Investigating... > > > > > > -- > > > Jacques Nadeau > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> I got clean regression runs as well. I've merged the patch. > > >> > > >> Jason, you want to start the release process? > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Jacques Nadeau > > >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > >> > > >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Abhishek Girish <agir...@mapr.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Had two clean Functional runs. TPC-H SF100 was also successful. > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:07 PM, rahul challapalli < > > >>> challapallira...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > Kicked off a functional run with your branch. Will let you know > once > > it > > >>> > finishes > > >>> > > > >>> > - Rahul > > >>> > > > >>> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Jacques Nadeau < > jacq...@dremio.com> > > >>> > wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > > 4196 was merged today. I have an updated patch for 4291 that is > > >>> ready. > > >>> > > Unfortunately, it seems that something isn't working with our > > >>> extended > > >>> > > tests so I haven't been able to run an extended regression. Unit > > >>> tests > > >>> > > pass. Is someone else possibly able to run a regression suite > > against > > >>> > this > > >>> > > branch [1] so we can confirm things look good and start the > release > > >>> > > process? > > >>> > > > > >>> > > thanks, > > >>> > > Jacques > > >>> > > > > >>> > > [1] https://github.com/jacques-n/drill/tree/DRILL-4291v2 > > >>> > > > > >>> > > -- > > >>> > > Jacques Nadeau > > >>> > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > >>> > > > > >>> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Jacques Nadeau < > > jacq...@dremio.com > > >>> > > > >>> > > wrote: > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > I think the main things are 4196 and 4291 should be completed. > I > > >>> know > > >>> > > Amit > > >>> > > > was able to reproduce 4196 locally this weekend so I think > we're > > >>> close > > >>> > on > > >>> > > > that. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > -- > > >>> > > > Jacques Nadeau > > >>> > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Zelaine Fong < > > zf...@maprtech.com > > >>> > > > >>> > > wrote: > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> Any updates on this? What's blocking us from taking this to a > > >>> vote -- > > >>> > > the > > >>> > > >> sort merge join issues? > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> -- Zelaine > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Jacques Nadeau < > > >>> jacq...@dremio.com> > > >>> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > Bumping this thread... > > >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > Here are the issues that were mentioned in this thread along > > >>> with a > > >>> > > >> > proposed categorization: > > >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > Release Blockers > > >>> > > >> > In-progress Amit > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4190 > > >>> > > >> > In-progress Amit > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4196 > > >>> > > >> > Ready to merge Jacques > > >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4246 > > >>> > > >> > In-review Jinfeng > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4256 > > >>> > > >> > In-progress Jacques > > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4278 > > >>> > > >> > Ready to merge Laurent > > >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4285 > > >>> > > >> > Nice to Have > > >>> > > >> > Open Jason/Hakim > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4247 > > >>> > > >> > In-progress Jason > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4203 > > >>> > > >> > Open Jacques > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4266 > > >>> > > >> > Ready to merge Jacques > > >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4131 > > >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > What do others think? Let's try to get the blockers wrapped > up > > >>> in > > >>> > the > > >>> > > >> next > > >>> > > >> > day or two and start a release vote... > > >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > -- > > >>> > > >> > Jacques Nadeau > > >>> > > >> > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Jason Altekruse < > > >>> > > >> altekruseja...@gmail.com> > > >>> > > >> > wrote: > > >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > Hello All, > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > With the allocator changes merged and about a month since > > the > > >>> last > > >>> > > >> > release > > >>> > > >> > > I think it would be good to start a vote soon. I would > like > > to > > >>> > > >> volunteer > > >>> > > >> > to > > >>> > > >> > > be release manager. > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > I know that there were some issues that were identified > > after > > >>> the > > >>> > > >> > transfer > > >>> > > >> > > patch was merged. I think that these issues should be > fixed > > >>> before > > >>> > > we > > >>> > > >> > cut a > > >>> > > >> > > release candidate. > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > From looking at the associated JIRAs it looked like there > > was > > >>> a > > >>> > > >> possible > > >>> > > >> > > short term fix just adjusting the > max_query_memory_per_node > > >>> > option, > > >>> > > >> and > > >>> > > >> > > some more involved work to change how we determine the > > correct > > >>> > time > > >>> > > to > > >>> > > >> > > spill during external sort. I believe it makes sense to > make > > >>> > > external > > >>> > > >> > sort > > >>> > > >> > > work well with the newly improved memory accounting before > > >>> > cutting a > > >>> > > >> > > release, but I'm not sure how much work is left to be done > > >>> there. > > >>> > > [1] > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > Please respond with your thoughts on a release soon and > any > > >>> JIRAs > > >>> > > you > > >>> > > >> > would > > >>> > > >> > > like to include in the release. > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4243 > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > Thanks, > > >>> > > >> > > Jason > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>> > > >> > > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >
