Jacques, I am getting the following build failure on the latest master
branch...is this what you saw for the Apache build ? My mvn version output
is shown below. Should we all be upgrading to a newer mvn ?
[INFO] --- maven-enforcer-plugin:1.3.1:enforce
(enforce-jdbc-jar-compactness) @ drill-jdbc-all ---
[WARNING] Rule 0: org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.RequireFilesSize failed
with message:
The file drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar is outside the expected size
range.
This is likely due to you adding new dependencies to a
java-exec and not updating the excludes in this module. This is important
as it minimizes the size of the dependency of Drill application users.
/Users/asinha/incubator-drill/exec/jdbc-all/target/drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
size (44664121) too large. Max. is
20000000/Users/asinha/incubator-drill/exec/jdbc-all/target/drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
Administrators-MacBook-Pro-144:incubator-drill asinha$ mvn --version
Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19
05:51:28-0800)
Maven home: /opt/local/share/java/maven3
Java version: 1.7.0_45, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home:
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_45.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.9.5", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac"
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> wrote:
> Build back to normal. It looks like the Apache server was using an old
> version of Maven. Once I switched to something more recent, the build
> passed.
>
> --
> Jacques Nadeau
> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hmm... this merge caused the Apache build to fail. Investigating...
> >
> > --
> > Jacques Nadeau
> > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I got clean regression runs as well. I've merged the patch.
> >>
> >> Jason, you want to start the release process?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jacques Nadeau
> >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Abhishek Girish <agir...@mapr.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Had two clean Functional runs. TPC-H SF100 was also successful.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:07 PM, rahul challapalli <
> >>> challapallira...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Kicked off a functional run with your branch. Will let you know once
> it
> >>> > finishes
> >>> >
> >>> > - Rahul
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > 4196 was merged today. I have an updated patch for 4291 that is
> >>> ready.
> >>> > > Unfortunately, it seems that something isn't working with our
> >>> extended
> >>> > > tests so I haven't been able to run an extended regression. Unit
> >>> tests
> >>> > > pass. Is someone else possibly able to run a regression suite
> against
> >>> > this
> >>> > > branch [1] so we can confirm things look good and start the release
> >>> > > process?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > thanks,
> >>> > > Jacques
> >>> > >
> >>> > > [1] https://github.com/jacques-n/drill/tree/DRILL-4291v2
> >>> > >
> >>> > > --
> >>> > > Jacques Nadeau
> >>> > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Jacques Nadeau <
> jacq...@dremio.com
> >>> >
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > I think the main things are 4196 and 4291 should be completed. I
> >>> know
> >>> > > Amit
> >>> > > > was able to reproduce 4196 locally this weekend so I think we're
> >>> close
> >>> > on
> >>> > > > that.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > --
> >>> > > > Jacques Nadeau
> >>> > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Zelaine Fong <
> zf...@maprtech.com
> >>> >
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >> Any updates on this? What's blocking us from taking this to a
> >>> vote --
> >>> > > the
> >>> > > >> sort merge join issues?
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >> -- Zelaine
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
> >>> jacq...@dremio.com>
> >>> > > >> wrote:
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >> > Bumping this thread...
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> > Here are the issues that were mentioned in this thread along
> >>> with a
> >>> > > >> > proposed categorization:
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> > Release Blockers
> >>> > > >> > In-progress Amit
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4190
> >>> > > >> > In-progress Amit
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4196
> >>> > > >> > Ready to merge Jacques
> >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4246
> >>> > > >> > In-review Jinfeng
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4256
> >>> > > >> > In-progress Jacques
> >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4278
> >>> > > >> > Ready to merge Laurent
> >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4285
> >>> > > >> > Nice to Have
> >>> > > >> > Open Jason/Hakim
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4247
> >>> > > >> > In-progress Jason
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4203
> >>> > > >> > Open Jacques https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4266
> >>> > > >> > Ready to merge Jacques
> >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4131
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> > What do others think? Let's try to get the blockers wrapped up
> >>> in
> >>> > the
> >>> > > >> next
> >>> > > >> > day or two and start a release vote...
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> > --
> >>> > > >> > Jacques Nadeau
> >>> > > >> > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Jason Altekruse <
> >>> > > >> altekruseja...@gmail.com>
> >>> > > >> > wrote:
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> > > Hello All,
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > With the allocator changes merged and about a month since
> the
> >>> last
> >>> > > >> > release
> >>> > > >> > > I think it would be good to start a vote soon. I would like
> to
> >>> > > >> volunteer
> >>> > > >> > to
> >>> > > >> > > be release manager.
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > I know that there were some issues that were identified
> after
> >>> the
> >>> > > >> > transfer
> >>> > > >> > > patch was merged. I think that these issues should be fixed
> >>> before
> >>> > > we
> >>> > > >> > cut a
> >>> > > >> > > release candidate.
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > From looking at the associated JIRAs it looked like there
> was
> >>> a
> >>> > > >> possible
> >>> > > >> > > short term fix just adjusting the max_query_memory_per_node
> >>> > option,
> >>> > > >> and
> >>> > > >> > > some more involved work to change how we determine the
> correct
> >>> > time
> >>> > > to
> >>> > > >> > > spill during external sort. I believe it makes sense to make
> >>> > > external
> >>> > > >> > sort
> >>> > > >> > > work well with the newly improved memory accounting before
> >>> > cutting a
> >>> > > >> > > release, but I'm not sure how much work is left to be done
> >>> there.
> >>> > > [1]
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > Please respond with your thoughts on a release soon and any
> >>> JIRAs
> >>> > > you
> >>> > > >> > would
> >>> > > >> > > like to include in the release.
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4243
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> > > Thanks,
> >>> > > >> > > Jason
> >>> > > >> > >
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
