4196 was merged today. I have an updated patch for 4291 that is ready. Unfortunately, it seems that something isn't working with our extended tests so I haven't been able to run an extended regression. Unit tests pass. Is someone else possibly able to run a regression suite against this branch [1] so we can confirm things look good and start the release process?
thanks, Jacques [1] https://github.com/jacques-n/drill/tree/DRILL-4291v2 -- Jacques Nadeau CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> wrote: > I think the main things are 4196 and 4291 should be completed. I know Amit > was able to reproduce 4196 locally this weekend so I think we're close on > that. > > -- > Jacques Nadeau > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Zelaine Fong <zf...@maprtech.com> wrote: > >> Any updates on this? What's blocking us from taking this to a vote -- the >> sort merge join issues? >> >> -- Zelaine >> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Bumping this thread... >> > >> > Here are the issues that were mentioned in this thread along with a >> > proposed categorization: >> > >> > Release Blockers >> > In-progress Amit https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4190 >> > In-progress Amit https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4196 >> > Ready to merge Jacques https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4246 >> > In-review Jinfeng https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4256 >> > In-progress Jacques https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4278 >> > Ready to merge Laurent https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4285 >> > Nice to Have >> > Open Jason/Hakim https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4247 >> > In-progress Jason https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4203 >> > Open Jacques https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4266 >> > Ready to merge Jacques https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4131 >> > >> > What do others think? Let's try to get the blockers wrapped up in the >> next >> > day or two and start a release vote... >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Jacques Nadeau >> > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> > >> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Jason Altekruse < >> altekruseja...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hello All, >> > > >> > > With the allocator changes merged and about a month since the last >> > release >> > > I think it would be good to start a vote soon. I would like to >> volunteer >> > to >> > > be release manager. >> > > >> > > I know that there were some issues that were identified after the >> > transfer >> > > patch was merged. I think that these issues should be fixed before we >> > cut a >> > > release candidate. >> > > >> > > From looking at the associated JIRAs it looked like there was a >> possible >> > > short term fix just adjusting the max_query_memory_per_node option, >> and >> > > some more involved work to change how we determine the correct time to >> > > spill during external sort. I believe it makes sense to make external >> > sort >> > > work well with the newly improved memory accounting before cutting a >> > > release, but I'm not sure how much work is left to be done there. [1] >> > > >> > > Please respond with your thoughts on a release soon and any JIRAs you >> > would >> > > like to include in the release. >> > > >> > > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4243 >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Jason >> > > >> > >> > >
