Venki's backwards compatibility fix (commit id: 03197d0) is before the partition pruning commit. So, it seems to be fine to create a release candidate from 03197d0; no need to cherry-pick.
As for whether the partition pruning changes are risky, the pre-commit run did not show any serious problems in the first run; all the plan changes are expected, or expose some existing problem (drill-4279). However, I agree that it impacts the main code path of query planning, and I'm fine that we exclude the partition change from 1.5.0 release, since it's merged right before we start a voting. I did not see any one mentioned that the master branch is closed, and therefore assume it's still open for commits. I probably should have asked whether the master was open for new patches before I merged the commits. On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote: > Jinfeng, do you agree that the changes are risky? I was going mostly by > commit messages. > > Also just realized that the backwards compatibility fix to the storage > plugin interface is after these. Could create release branch from 03197d... > and then cherry pick the Venki change. Or could keep them all. Or > go without the compatibility fix.... > > -- > Jacques Nadeau > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Jinfeng Ni <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Jason, >> >> I'm fine that release 1.5.0 starts from 03197d0f2. One thing I need >> point out is that the pre-commit test suite has some testcase's plan >> output modified because of the partition pruning change. If we run >> pre-commit against the candidate release for 1.5.0, we have to use a >> prior version of pre-commit suite. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Jason Altekruse >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > That sounds reasonable to me. I'll start preparing a release candidate. >> > >> > Jinfeng, are you okay waiting for the next release to include this >> change? >> > >> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Hey Jason, >> >> >> >> Can you start the release vote? We've let this drag on too long. >> >> >> >> I suggest we start from 03197d0f2. It seems like the partition pruning >> >> changes are pretty complicated and on a pretty main path to add right >> >> before the vote. Since Hsuan's fix (pr 349) hasn't been reviewed, I >> think >> >> we should start the vote without it. >> >> >> >> Jacques >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jacques Nadeau >> >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Hsuan Yi Chu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Yes, just send a pull request. >> >> > https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/349 >> >> > >> >> > Can Jinfeng review it? >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Jinfeng Ni <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > Sean probably is quite close to find a fix for this issue. Let's see >> >> > > whether he can post a patch soon. >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:29 PM, rahul challapalli >> >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > DRILL-4323 only happens when assertions are turned on (my install >> >> > script >> >> > > > automatically enables assertions). >> >> > > > >> >> > > > - Rahul >> >> > > > >> >> > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Zelaine Fong < >> [email protected]> >> >> > > wrote: >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> Rahul, >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> Let us know if you can reproduce the issue with assertions turned >> >> OFF. >> >> > > If >> >> > > >> you cannot, then I think this should not be a blocker for 1.5, >> and >> >> > Hsuan >> >> > > >> will continue to look into fixing this. >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> -- Zelaine >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Krystal Nguyen < >> >> > [email protected]> >> >> > > >> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > I do see the same error with assertion turned on. >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Jinfeng Ni < >> >> [email protected]> >> >> > > >> wrote: >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > Krystal, by any chance, did you turn on assertion when you >> start >> >> > > >> > drillbit? >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > I think the error in drill-4323 will be raised when >> assertion = >> >> > on. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Krystal Nguyen < >> >> > > [email protected]> >> >> > > >> > > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > > I am running drill-1.4 and is able to run count(*) >> >> successfully. >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > 0: jdbc:drill:zk=10.10.100.113:5181,10.10.100> alter >> session >> >> > set >> >> > > >> > > > `store.hive.optimize_scan_with_native_readers` = true; >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > +-------+--------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> > > >> > > > | ok | summary >> >> > | >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > +-------+--------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> > > >> > > > | true | store.hive.optimize_scan_with_native_readers >> >> > updated. | >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > +-------+--------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> > > >> > > > 1 row selected (0.374 seconds) >> >> > > >> > > > 0: jdbc:drill:zk=10.10.100.113:5181,10.10.100> select >> >> count(*) >> >> > > from >> >> > > >> > > > lineitem_parquet_partitioned_hive_string; >> >> > > >> > > > +---------+ >> >> > > >> > > > | EXPR$0 | >> >> > > >> > > > +---------+ >> >> > > >> > > > | 60175 | >> >> > > >> > > > +---------+ >> >> > > >> > > > 1 row selected (2.986 seconds) >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Jinfeng Ni < >> >> > > [email protected]> >> >> > > >> > > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> Venki and I did some investigation for DRILL-4323. The >> issue >> >> > > >> reported >> >> > > >> > > >> in DRILL-4323 seems to happen on 1.4.0 release as well. >> Seems >> >> > to >> >> > > us >> >> > > >> > > >> this is not a regression from 1.4.0; it's a regression >> from >> >> > 1.3.0 >> >> > > >> > > >> probably. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> DRILL-4083 makes the planner to use DrillHiveNativeReader >> in >> >> > > stead >> >> > > >> of >> >> > > >> > > >> HiveReader for "select count(*) from hive_table" query. >> >> > However, >> >> > > >> the >> >> > > >> > > >> Project after the scan produces empty schema. Before >> >> > DRILL-4083, >> >> > > >> > > >> Drill uses HiveScan, which works fine. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Jason Altekruse >> >> > > >> > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> > We could revert the change to the StoragePlugin >> interface >> >> to >> >> > > add >> >> > > >> the >> >> > > >> > > >> > getLogicalOptimizerRules >> >> > > >> > > >> > and getPhysicalOptimizerRules, and only put those in >> >> > > >> > > >> AbstractStoragePlugin >> >> > > >> > > >> > with default implementations. >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > We could then update the docs to tell users to not >> >> implement >> >> > > the >> >> > > >> > > >> interface >> >> > > >> > > >> > directly, and instead extend the abstract class, which I >> >> > > believe >> >> > > >> > would >> >> > > >> > > >> > allow us to make changes like this in the future without >> >> > > breaking >> >> > > >> > > >> plugins. >> >> > > >> > > >> > At a major release version we could then just pull up >> all >> >> of >> >> > > the >> >> > > >> new >> >> > > >> > > >> > methods we added to the abstract class into the >> interface, >> >> or >> >> > > just >> >> > > >> > get >> >> > > >> > > >> rid >> >> > > >> > > >> > of it all-together. >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Venki Korukanti < >> >> > > >> > > >> [email protected]> >> >> > > >> > > >> > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Here is the partial fix: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> https://github.com/vkorukanti/drill/commit/6646b0d08df274a22dff870ad5e6f6914b10fa0b >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> If the existing StragePlugins are implementing >> >> > > >> > AbstractStoragePlugin >> >> > > >> > > >> class >> >> > > >> > > >> >> this fix should resolve the backward compat issue. If >> they >> >> > are >> >> > > >> > > >> implementing >> >> > > >> > > >> >> StoragePlugin interface directly then it won't resolve >> the >> >> > > issue. >> >> > > >> > Not >> >> > > >> > > >> sure >> >> > > >> > > >> >> how to handle it in that case. Let me know if there any >> >> ways >> >> > > to >> >> > > >> > > resolve >> >> > > >> > > >> >> this issue completely. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Thanks >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Venki >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Aman Sinha < >> >> > > [email protected] >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > I was able to do the build with maven 3.3.9 (after >> doing >> >> > > 'brew >> >> > > >> > > install >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > maven'). Here are my env variables related to maven: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > M2_HOME=/usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.3.9/libexec >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > M2=/usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.3.9/libexec/bin >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx2048m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Jacques Nadeau < >> >> > > >> > > [email protected]> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > Aman, for reference on the Maven version issue. You >> >> can >> >> > > see >> >> > > >> the >> >> > > >> > > >> output >> >> > > >> > > >> >> of >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > the shade plugin between the two Apache Builds. If >> you >> >> > > search >> >> > > >> > for >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > maven-shade-plugin you'll see that build 647 (maven >> >> > 3.0.5) >> >> > > >> > fails >> >> > > >> > > >> >> because >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > it >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > includes a bunch of hadoop (and other libraries >> that >> >> are >> >> > > >> listed >> >> > > >> > > as >> >> > > >> > > >> >> being >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > excluded). If you look at build 648 (maven 3.3.3), >> >> those >> >> > > >> items >> >> > > >> > > are >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > included >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > so that the build completes successfully. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/drill-scm/647/consoleText >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/drill-scm/648/consoleText >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > -- >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > Jacques Nadeau >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:01 PM, rahul challapalli >> < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > Jason, >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > As of now I haven't narrowed down the exact >> commit >> >> > which >> >> > > >> > caused >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > DRILL-4323 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > and I do not know the scope of the fix. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > - Rahul >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Jason Altekruse >> < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > [email protected] >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > I think it makes sense to wait for Venki's fix >> of >> >> > the >> >> > > >> API, >> >> > > >> > as >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > releasing a >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > version with the change would make >> >> > > reverting/refactoring >> >> > > >> > the >> >> > > >> > > API >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > breaking >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > change less useful. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > Do you have any idea about the scope of fixing >> the >> >> > > hive >> >> > > >> > > native >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > reader, >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > or >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > which change since the 1.4 release broke it? Is >> >> > > someone >> >> > > >> > > >> available >> >> > > >> > > >> >> to >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > look >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > at it today? >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:33 PM, rahul >> >> challapalli < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > Just found an issue with hive native parquet >> >> > reader >> >> > > >> > > >> (DRILL-4323). >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > This >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > is a >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > regression from 1.4 and in my opinion should >> be >> >> > > treated >> >> > > >> > as >> >> > > >> > > a >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > blocker. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > - Rahul >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Venki >> >> Korukanti < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > [email protected]> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Sorry I didn't realize I was breaking the >> >> public >> >> > > >> > > interface >> >> > > >> > > >> API. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > Let >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > me >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > work >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > on a patch to make it backward compatible. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Thanks >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Venki >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Steven >> >> > Phillips >> >> > > < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > [email protected] >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > I just wanted to bring up an issue that I >> >> just >> >> > > now >> >> > > >> > > >> >> discovered, >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > that >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > has >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > caused me a fair amount of grief. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/300/commits >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > DRILL-4198 changes a user-facing API, and >> >> > causes >> >> > > >> > > >> >> StoragePlugins >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > that >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > were >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > compiled against currently released >> versions >> >> > of >> >> > > >> Drill >> >> > > >> > > to >> >> > > >> > > >> no >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > longer >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > functional properly. I would prefer that >> >> this >> >> > > >> > breaking >> >> > > >> > > >> change >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > be >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > modified >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > to be backward compatible if possible. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Jason >> >> > > Altekruse < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > [email protected]> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Hi Aman, >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > This is the failure that he was >> seeing. He >> >> > > >> figured >> >> > > >> > > out >> >> > > >> > > >> that >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > the >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > new >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > exclusions in jdbc-all were not being >> >> > > respected >> >> > > >> > when >> >> > > >> > > the >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > build >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > was >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > run >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > with >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > an older Maven version, causing the jar >> >> size >> >> > > to >> >> > > >> > > increase >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > significantly. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > He >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > added an enforcer to make sure the JAR >> >> > didn't >> >> > > >> grow >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > unexpectedly. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > Can >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > you >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > try to update your maven version and >> >> re-run >> >> > > the >> >> > > >> > > build? >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > - Jason >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Aman >> >> > Sinha < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > [email protected]> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Jacques, I am getting the following >> >> build >> >> > > >> failure >> >> > > >> > > on >> >> > > >> > > >> the >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > latest >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > master >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > branch...is this what you saw for the >> >> > Apache >> >> > > >> > build >> >> > > >> > > ? >> >> > > >> > > >> My >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > mvn >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > version >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > output >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > is shown below. Should we all be >> >> > upgrading >> >> > > to >> >> > > >> a >> >> > > >> > > newer >> >> > > >> > > >> >> mvn >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > ? >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > [INFO] --- >> >> > > maven-enforcer-plugin:1.3.1:enforce >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > (enforce-jdbc-jar-compactness) @ >> >> > > drill-jdbc-all >> >> > > >> > --- >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > [WARNING] Rule 0: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.RequireFilesSize >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > failed >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > with message: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > The file >> >> drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >> >> > > is >> >> > > >> > > outside >> >> > > >> > > >> the >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > expected >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > size >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > range. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > This is likely due >> to >> >> > you >> >> > > >> > adding >> >> > > >> > > new >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > dependencies >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > to >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > a >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > java-exec and not updating the >> excludes >> >> in >> >> > > this >> >> > > >> > > >> module. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > This >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > is >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > important >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > as it minimizes the size of the >> >> dependency >> >> > > of >> >> > > >> > Drill >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > application >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > users. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> /Users/asinha/incubator-drill/exec/jdbc-all/target/drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > size (44664121) too large. Max. is >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> 20000000/Users/asinha/incubator-drill/exec/jdbc-all/target/drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > Administrators-MacBook-Pro-144:incubator-drill >> >> > > >> > > asinha$ >> >> > > >> > > >> >> mvn >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > --version >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Apache Maven 3.0.5 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > 2013-02-19 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > 05:51:28-0800) >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Maven home: >> /opt/local/share/java/maven3 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Java version: 1.7.0_45, vendor: >> Oracle >> >> > > >> > Corporation >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Java home: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_45.jdk/Contents/Home/jre >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Default locale: en_US, platform >> >> encoding: >> >> > > UTF-8 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > OS name: "mac os x", version: >> "10.9.5", >> >> > > arch: >> >> > > >> > > >> "x86_64", >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > family: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > "mac" >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:20 AM, >> Jacques >> >> > > >> Nadeau < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > [email protected]> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Build back to normal. It looks like >> >> the >> >> > > >> Apache >> >> > > >> > > >> server >> >> > > >> > > >> >> was >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > using >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > an >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > old >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > version of Maven. Once I switched >> to >> >> > > >> something >> >> > > >> > > more >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > recent, >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > the >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > build >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > passed. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > -- >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Jacques Nadeau >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:02 AM, >> >> Jacques >> >> > > >> > Nadeau < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > [email protected]> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm... this merge caused the >> Apache >> >> > > build >> >> > > >> to >> >> > > >> > > fail. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Investigating... >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Jacques Nadeau >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:31 AM, >> >> > Jacques >> >> > > >> > > Nadeau < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > [email protected]> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> I got clean regression runs as >> >> well. >> >> > > I've >> >> > > >> > > merged >> >> > > >> > > >> the >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > patch. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Jason, you want to start the >> >> release >> >> > > >> > process? >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> -- >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Jacques Nadeau >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:42 >> PM, >> >> > > Abhishek >> >> > > >> > > >> Girish < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > [email protected] >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Had two clean Functional runs. >> >> TPC-H >> >> > > >> SF100 >> >> > > >> > > was >> >> > > >> > > >> also >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > successful. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:07 >> PM, >> >> > > rahul >> >> > > >> > > >> >> challapalli < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> [email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Kicked off a functional run >> with >> >> > > your >> >> > > >> > > branch. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Will >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > let >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > you >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > know >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > once >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > it >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > finishes >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > - Rahul >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:56 >> PM, >> >> > > >> Jacques >> >> > > >> > > >> Nadeau < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > 4196 was merged today. I >> have >> >> an >> >> > > >> > updated >> >> > > >> > > >> patch >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > for >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > 4291 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > that >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > is >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> ready. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Unfortunately, it seems >> that >> >> > > >> something >> >> > > >> > > isn't >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > working >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > with >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > our >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> extended >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > tests so I haven't been >> able >> >> to >> >> > > run >> >> > > >> an >> >> > > >> > > >> extended >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > regression. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Unit >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> tests >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > pass. Is someone else >> possibly >> >> > > able >> >> > > >> to >> >> > > >> > > run a >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > regression >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > suite >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > against >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > this >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > branch [1] so we can >> confirm >> >> > > things >> >> > > >> > look >> >> > > >> > > >> good >> >> > > >> > > >> >> and >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > start >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > the >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > release >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > process? >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > thanks, >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Jacques >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > [1] >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > https://github.com/jacques-n/drill/tree/DRILL-4291v2 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > -- >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Jacques Nadeau >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at >> 11:20 >> >> > AM, >> >> > > >> > Jacques >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Nadeau >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > [email protected] >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > I think the main things >> are >> >> > 4196 >> >> > > >> and >> >> > > >> > > 4291 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > should >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > be >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > completed. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > I >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> know >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Amit >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > was able to reproduce >> 4196 >> >> > > locally >> >> > > >> > this >> >> > > >> > > >> >> weekend >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > so >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > I >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > think >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > we're >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> close >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > on >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > that. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > -- >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Jacques Nadeau >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > CTO and Co-Founder, >> Dremio >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at >> >> 10:14 >> >> > > AM, >> >> > > >> > > Zelaine >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Fong >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > [email protected] >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> Any updates on this? >> >> What's >> >> > > >> > blocking >> >> > > >> > > us >> >> > > >> > > >> >> from >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > taking >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > this >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > to a >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> vote -- >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > the >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> sort merge join issues? >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> -- Zelaine >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at >> >> 4:18 >> >> > > PM, >> >> > > >> > > Jacques >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > Nadeau >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> [email protected]> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Bumping this thread... >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Here are the issues >> that >> >> > were >> >> > > >> > > >> mentioned in >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > this >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > thread >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > along >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> with a >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > proposed >> categorization: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Release Blockers >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-progress Amit >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4190 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-progress Amit >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4196 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Ready to merge Jacques >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4246 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-review Jinfeng >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4256 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-progress Jacques >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> >> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4278 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Ready to merge Laurent >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4285 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Nice to Have >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Open Jason/Hakim >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4247 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-progress Jason >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4203 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Open Jacques >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4266 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Ready to merge Jacques >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4131 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > What do others think? >> >> Let's >> >> > > try >> >> > > >> to >> >> > > >> > > get >> >> > > >> > > >> the >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > blockers >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > wrapped >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > up >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> in >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > the >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> next >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > day or two and start a >> >> > > release >> >> > > >> > > vote... >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > -- >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Jacques Nadeau >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > CTO and Co-Founder, >> >> Dremio >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at >> >> 1:48 >> >> > > PM, >> >> > > >> > > Jason >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > Altekruse >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > < >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> [email protected]> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > wrote: >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Hello All, >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > With the allocator >> >> > changes >> >> > > >> > merged >> >> > > >> > > and >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > about >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > a >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > month >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > since >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > the >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> last >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > release >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > I think it would be >> >> good >> >> > to >> >> > > >> > start >> >> > > >> > > a >> >> > > >> > > >> vote >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > soon. I >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > would >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > like >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > to >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> volunteer >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > to >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > be release manager. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > I know that there >> were >> >> > some >> >> > > >> > issues >> >> > > >> > > >> that >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > were >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > identified >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > after >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> the >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > transfer >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > patch was merged. I >> >> think >> >> > > that >> >> > > >> > > these >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > issues >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > should >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > be >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > fixed >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> before >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > we >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > cut a >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > release candidate. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > From looking at the >> >> > > associated >> >> > > >> > > JIRAs >> >> > > >> > > >> it >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > looked >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > like >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > there >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > was >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> a >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> possible >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > short term fix just >> >> > > adjusting >> >> > > >> > the >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > max_query_memory_per_node >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > option, >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> and >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > some more involved >> work >> >> > to >> >> > > >> > change >> >> > > >> > > >> how we >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > determine >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > the >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > correct >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > time >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > to >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > spill during >> external >> >> > > sort. I >> >> > > >> > > >> believe it >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > makes >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > sense >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > to >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > make >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > external >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > sort >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > work well with the >> >> newly >> >> > > >> > improved >> >> > > >> > > >> memory >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > accounting >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > before >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > cutting a >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > release, but I'm not >> >> sure >> >> > > how >> >> > > >> > much >> >> > > >> > > >> work >> >> > > >> > > >> >> is >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > left >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > to >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > be >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > done >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> there. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > [1] >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Please respond with >> >> your >> >> > > >> > thoughts >> >> > > >> > > on >> >> > > >> > > >> a >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > release >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > soon >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > and >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > any >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> JIRAs >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > you >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > would >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > like to include in >> the >> >> > > >> release. >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > [1] - >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4243 >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Thanks, >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Jason >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
