I have trouble understanding the meaning of "GPG signed" =P On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Jason Altekruse <altekruseja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A question for previous release managers. Jacques was thinking I may need > to have my GPG signed to get linked into the Apache Web of Trust. Is this > necessary for making a release? > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Jason Altekruse <altekruseja...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> The only solution to this issue I have found is disabling the new plugin >> to automatically enforce the size of the jdbc-all plugin. I don't know why >> it is behaving differently when performing a release than it did during a >> 'mvn install', but I have verified the correct size of the JAR manually and >> am planning on pushing a candidate soon with the small change to disable >> the automatic jar size enforcement. >> >> I will open a JIRA for getting this resolved after the release. >> >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Jinfeng Ni <jinfengn...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Good to hear this, Jacques & Jason. That makes feel relieved. :-) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Jason Altekruse >>> <altekruseja...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > I don't think there was any issue with the merge either Jinfeng, I >>> don't >>> > think we need to close master. I had to step out for a few hours, but >>> I am >>> > working on finishing up the candidate right now. >>> > >>> > Having a weird RAT issue running the actual maven release command, it's >>> > complaining about a dependency-reduced-pom.xml in the target directory >>> of >>> > jdbc-all lacking a license header (although target directories should >>> be >>> > ignored). Checking out the commit before the recent changes to the >>> jdbc-all >>> > exclusions seems to get rid of the issue, but the changes in the pom >>> file >>> > don't seem like they should be causing any problems. >>> > >>> > Still trying to debug and hoping to have a vote up tonight. >>> > >>> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Given how easy it is to create a branch off a random commit, I >>> generally >>> >> don't see a point in closing the master branch. I figure the release >>> >> manager can propose where they'd like to fork if this type of thing >>> comes >>> >> up. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks for the feedback Jinfeng. Of course you're right about Venki's >>> >> commit. My bad. >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Jacques Nadeau >>> >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Jinfeng Ni <jinfengn...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > Venki's backwards compatibility fix (commit id: >>> >> > 03197d0) is before the partition pruning commit. So, it seems to >>> be >>> >> > fine to create a release candidate from 03197d0; no need to >>> >> > cherry-pick. >>> >> > >>> >> > As for whether the partition pruning changes are risky, the >>> pre-commit >>> >> > run did not show any serious problems in the first run; all the plan >>> >> > changes are expected, or expose some existing problem (drill-4279). >>> >> > However, I agree that it impacts the main code path of query >>> planning, >>> >> > and I'm fine that we exclude the partition change from 1.5.0 >>> release, >>> >> > since it's merged right before we start a voting. >>> >> > >>> >> > I did not see any one mentioned that the master branch is closed, >>> and >>> >> > therefore assume it's still open for commits. I probably should >>> have >>> >> > asked whether the master was open for new patches before I merged >>> the >>> >> > commits. >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com >>> > >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > > Jinfeng, do you agree that the changes are risky? I was going >>> mostly by >>> >> > > commit messages. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Also just realized that the backwards compatibility fix to the >>> storage >>> >> > > plugin interface is after these. Could create release branch from >>> >> > 03197d... >>> >> > > and then cherry pick the Venki change. Or could keep them all. Or >>> >> > > go without the compatibility fix.... >>> >> > > >>> >> > > -- >>> >> > > Jacques Nadeau >>> >> > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >>> >> > > >>> >> > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Jinfeng Ni < >>> jinfengn...@gmail.com> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > > >>> >> > >> Hi Jason, >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> I'm fine that release 1.5.0 starts from 03197d0f2. One thing I >>> need >>> >> > >> point out is that the pre-commit test suite has some testcase's >>> plan >>> >> > >> output modified because of the partition pruning change. If we >>> run >>> >> > >> pre-commit against the candidate release for 1.5.0, we have to >>> use a >>> >> > >> prior version of pre-commit suite. >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Jason Altekruse >>> >> > >> <altekruseja...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > >> > That sounds reasonable to me. I'll start preparing a release >>> >> > candidate. >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > Jinfeng, are you okay waiting for the next release to include >>> this >>> >> > >> change? >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Jacques Nadeau < >>> jacq...@dremio.com >>> >> > >>> >> > >> wrote: >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> >> Hey Jason, >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> Can you start the release vote? We've let this drag on too >>> long. >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> I suggest we start from 03197d0f2. It seems like the partition >>> >> > pruning >>> >> > >> >> changes are pretty complicated and on a pretty main path to >>> add >>> >> right >>> >> > >> >> before the vote. Since Hsuan's fix (pr 349) hasn't been >>> reviewed, I >>> >> > >> think >>> >> > >> >> we should start the vote without it. >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> Jacques >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> -- >>> >> > >> >> Jacques Nadeau >>> >> > >> >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Hsuan Yi Chu < >>> hyi...@maprtech.com >>> >> > >>> >> > >> wrote: >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > Yes, just send a pull request. >>> >> > >> >> > https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/349 >>> >> > >> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > Can Jinfeng review it? >>> >> > >> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >>> >> > >> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Jinfeng Ni < >>> >> jinfengn...@gmail.com >>> >> > > >>> >> > >> >> wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > Sean probably is quite close to find a fix for this issue. >>> >> Let's >>> >> > see >>> >> > >> >> > > whether he can post a patch soon. >>> >> > >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:29 PM, rahul challapalli >>> >> > >> >> > > <challapallira...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > > DRILL-4323 only happens when assertions are turned on >>> (my >>> >> > install >>> >> > >> >> > script >>> >> > >> >> > > > automatically enables assertions). >>> >> > >> >> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > > - Rahul >>> >> > >> >> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Zelaine Fong < >>> >> > >> zf...@maprtech.com> >>> >> > >> >> > > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> Rahul, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> Let us know if you can reproduce the issue with >>> assertions >>> >> > turned >>> >> > >> >> OFF. >>> >> > >> >> > > If >>> >> > >> >> > > >> you cannot, then I think this should not be a blocker >>> for >>> >> 1.5, >>> >> > >> and >>> >> > >> >> > Hsuan >>> >> > >> >> > > >> will continue to look into fixing this. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> -- Zelaine >>> >> > >> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Krystal Nguyen < >>> >> > >> >> > kngu...@maprtech.com> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > I do see the same error with assertion turned on. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Jinfeng Ni < >>> >> > >> >> jinfengn...@gmail.com> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > Krystal, by any chance, did you turn on assertion >>> when >>> >> you >>> >> > >> start >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > drillbit? >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > I think the error in drill-4323 will be raised when >>> >> > >> assertion = >>> >> > >> >> > on. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Krystal Nguyen < >>> >> > >> >> > > kngu...@maprtech.com> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > I am running drill-1.4 and is able to run >>> count(*) >>> >> > >> >> successfully. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > 0: jdbc:drill:zk=10.10.100.113:5181,10.10.100> >>> alter >>> >> > >> session >>> >> > >> >> > set >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > `store.hive.optimize_scan_with_native_readers` = >>> true; >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > >>> >> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------+ >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > | ok | summary >>> >> > >> >> > | >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > >>> >> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------+ >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > | true | >>> store.hive.optimize_scan_with_native_readers >>> >> > >> >> > updated. | >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > >>> >> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------+ >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > 1 row selected (0.374 seconds) >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > 0: jdbc:drill:zk=10.10.100.113:5181,10.10.100> >>> select >>> >> > >> >> count(*) >>> >> > >> >> > > from >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > lineitem_parquet_partitioned_hive_string; >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > +---------+ >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > | EXPR$0 | >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > +---------+ >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > | 60175 | >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > +---------+ >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > 1 row selected (2.986 seconds) >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Jinfeng Ni < >>> >> > >> >> > > jinfengn...@gmail.com> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Venki and I did some investigation for >>> DRILL-4323. >>> >> The >>> >> > >> issue >>> >> > >> >> > > >> reported >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> in DRILL-4323 seems to happen on 1.4.0 release >>> as >>> >> well. >>> >> > >> Seems >>> >> > >> >> > to >>> >> > >> >> > > us >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> this is not a regression from 1.4.0; it's a >>> >> regression >>> >> > >> from >>> >> > >> >> > 1.3.0 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> probably. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> DRILL-4083 makes the planner to use >>> >> > DrillHiveNativeReader >>> >> > >> in >>> >> > >> >> > > stead >>> >> > >> >> > > >> of >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> HiveReader for "select count(*) from hive_table" >>> >> query. >>> >> > >> >> > However, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Project after the scan produces empty schema. >>> Before >>> >> > >> >> > DRILL-4083, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Drill uses HiveScan, which works fine. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Jason Altekruse >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> <altekruseja...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > We could revert the change to the >>> StoragePlugin >>> >> > >> interface >>> >> > >> >> to >>> >> > >> >> > > add >>> >> > >> >> > > >> the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > getLogicalOptimizerRules >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > and getPhysicalOptimizerRules, and only put >>> those >>> >> in >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> AbstractStoragePlugin >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > with default implementations. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > We could then update the docs to tell users >>> to not >>> >> > >> >> implement >>> >> > >> >> > > the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> interface >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > directly, and instead extend the abstract >>> class, >>> >> > which I >>> >> > >> >> > > believe >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > would >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > allow us to make changes like this in the >>> future >>> >> > without >>> >> > >> >> > > breaking >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> plugins. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > At a major release version we could then just >>> pull >>> >> up >>> >> > >> all >>> >> > >> >> of >>> >> > >> >> > > the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> new >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > methods we added to the abstract class into >>> the >>> >> > >> interface, >>> >> > >> >> or >>> >> > >> >> > > just >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > get >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> rid >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > of it all-together. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Venki >>> Korukanti < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> venki.koruka...@gmail.com> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Here is the partial fix: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >>> >> >>> https://github.com/vkorukanti/drill/commit/6646b0d08df274a22dff870ad5e6f6914b10fa0b >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> If the existing StragePlugins are >>> implementing >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > AbstractStoragePlugin >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> class >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> this fix should resolve the backward compat >>> issue. >>> >> > If >>> >> > >> they >>> >> > >> >> > are >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> implementing >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> StoragePlugin interface directly then it >>> won't >>> >> > resolve >>> >> > >> the >>> >> > >> >> > > issue. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > Not >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> sure >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> how to handle it in that case. Let me know if >>> >> there >>> >> > any >>> >> > >> >> ways >>> >> > >> >> > > to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > resolve >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> this issue completely. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Thanks >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Venki >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Aman Sinha < >>> >> > >> >> > > asi...@maprtech.com >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > I was able to do the build with maven 3.3.9 >>> >> (after >>> >> > >> doing >>> >> > >> >> > > 'brew >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > install >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > maven'). Here are my env variables >>> related to >>> >> > maven: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>> M2_HOME=/usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.3.9/libexec >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>> M2=/usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.3.9/libexec/bin >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx2048m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Jacques >>> Nadeau >>> >> < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > jacq...@dremio.com> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > Aman, for reference on the Maven version >>> >> issue. >>> >> > You >>> >> > >> >> can >>> >> > >> >> > > see >>> >> > >> >> > > >> the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> output >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> of >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > the shade plugin between the two Apache >>> >> Builds. >>> >> > If >>> >> > >> you >>> >> > >> >> > > search >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > for >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > maven-shade-plugin you'll see that build >>> 647 >>> >> > (maven >>> >> > >> >> > 3.0.5) >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > fails >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> because >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > it >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > includes a bunch of hadoop (and other >>> >> libraries >>> >> > >> that >>> >> > >> >> are >>> >> > >> >> > > >> listed >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > as >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> being >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > excluded). If you look at build 648 >>> (maven >>> >> > 3.3.3), >>> >> > >> >> those >>> >> > >> >> > > >> items >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > are >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > included >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > so that the build completes successfully. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/drill-scm/647/consoleText >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/drill-scm/648/consoleText >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > -- >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > Jacques Nadeau >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:01 PM, rahul >>> >> > challapalli >>> >> > >> < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > challapallira...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > Jason, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > As of now I haven't narrowed down the >>> exact >>> >> > >> commit >>> >> > >> >> > which >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > caused >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > DRILL-4323 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > and I do not know the scope of the fix. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > - Rahul >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Jason >>> >> > Altekruse >>> >> > >> < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > altekruseja...@gmail.com >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > I think it makes sense to wait for >>> Venki's >>> >> > fix >>> >> > >> of >>> >> > >> >> > the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> API, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > as >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > releasing a >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > version with the change would make >>> >> > >> >> > > reverting/refactoring >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > API >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > breaking >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > change less useful. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > Do you have any idea about the scope >>> of >>> >> > fixing >>> >> > >> the >>> >> > >> >> > > hive >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > native >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > reader, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > or >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > which change since the 1.4 release >>> broke >>> >> > it? Is >>> >> > >> >> > > someone >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> available >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > look >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > at it today? >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:33 PM, >>> rahul >>> >> > >> >> challapalli < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > challapallira...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > Just found an issue with hive >>> native >>> >> > parquet >>> >> > >> >> > reader >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> (DRILL-4323). >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > This >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > is a >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > regression from 1.4 and in my >>> opinion >>> >> > should >>> >> > >> be >>> >> > >> >> > > treated >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > as >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > a >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > blocker. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > - Rahul >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:12 PM, >>> Venki >>> >> > >> >> Korukanti < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > venki.koruka...@gmail.com> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Sorry I didn't realize I was >>> breaking >>> >> > the >>> >> > >> >> public >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > interface >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> API. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > Let >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > me >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > work >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > on a patch to make it backward >>> >> > compatible. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Thanks >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Venki >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:54 PM, >>> >> Steven >>> >> > >> >> > Phillips >>> >> > >> >> > > < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > ste...@dremio.com >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > I just wanted to bring up an >>> issue >>> >> > that I >>> >> > >> >> just >>> >> > >> >> > > now >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> discovered, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > that >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > has >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > caused me a fair amount of >>> grief. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/300/commits >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > DRILL-4198 changes a >>> user-facing >>> >> API, >>> >> > and >>> >> > >> >> > causes >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> StoragePlugins >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > that >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > were >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > compiled against currently >>> released >>> >> > >> versions >>> >> > >> >> > of >>> >> > >> >> > > >> Drill >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> no >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > longer >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > functional properly. I would >>> prefer >>> >> > that >>> >> > >> >> this >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > breaking >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> change >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > be >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > modified >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > to be backward compatible if >>> >> possible. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:23 >>> AM, >>> >> > Jason >>> >> > >> >> > > Altekruse < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > altekruseja...@gmail.com> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Hi Aman, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > This is the failure that he >>> was >>> >> > >> seeing. He >>> >> > >> >> > > >> figured >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > out >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> that >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > new >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > exclusions in jdbc-all were >>> not >>> >> > being >>> >> > >> >> > > respected >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > when >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > build >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > was >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > run >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > with >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > an older Maven version, >>> causing >>> >> the >>> >> > jar >>> >> > >> >> size >>> >> > >> >> > > to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > increase >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > significantly. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > He >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > added an enforcer to make >>> sure the >>> >> > JAR >>> >> > >> >> > didn't >>> >> > >> >> > > >> grow >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > unexpectedly. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > Can >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > you >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > try to update your maven >>> version >>> >> and >>> >> > >> >> re-run >>> >> > >> >> > > the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > build? >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > - Jason >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at >>> 11:18 AM, >>> >> > Aman >>> >> > >> >> > Sinha < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > asi...@maprtech.com> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Jacques, I am getting the >>> >> > following >>> >> > >> >> build >>> >> > >> >> > > >> failure >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > on >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > latest >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > master >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > branch...is this what you >>> saw >>> >> for >>> >> > the >>> >> > >> >> > Apache >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > build >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > ? >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> My >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > mvn >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > version >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > output >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > is shown below. Should we >>> all >>> >> be >>> >> > >> >> > upgrading >>> >> > >> >> > > to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> a >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > newer >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> mvn >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > ? >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > [INFO] --- >>> >> > >> >> > > maven-enforcer-plugin:1.3.1:enforce >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> (enforce-jdbc-jar-compactness) @ >>> >> > >> >> > > drill-jdbc-all >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > --- >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > [WARNING] Rule 0: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.RequireFilesSize >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > failed >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > with message: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > The file >>> >> > >> >> drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >>> >> > >> >> > > is >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > outside >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > expected >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > size >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > range. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > This is >>> likely >>> >> > due >>> >> > >> to >>> >> > >> >> > you >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > adding >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > new >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > dependencies >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > a >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > java-exec and not updating >>> the >>> >> > >> excludes >>> >> > >> >> in >>> >> > >> >> > > this >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> module. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > This >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > is >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > important >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > as it minimizes the size >>> of the >>> >> > >> >> dependency >>> >> > >> >> > > of >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > Drill >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > application >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > users. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >>> >> >>> /Users/asinha/incubator-drill/exec/jdbc-all/target/drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > size (44664121) too large. >>> Max. >>> >> is >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >>> >> >>> 20000000/Users/asinha/incubator-drill/exec/jdbc-all/target/drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > Administrators-MacBook-Pro-144:incubator-drill >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > asinha$ >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> mvn >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > --version >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Apache Maven 3.0.5 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>> (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > 2013-02-19 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > 05:51:28-0800) >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Maven home: >>> >> > >> /opt/local/share/java/maven3 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Java version: 1.7.0_45, >>> vendor: >>> >> > >> Oracle >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > Corporation >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Java home: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >>> >> > /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_45.jdk/Contents/Home/jre >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Default locale: en_US, >>> platform >>> >> > >> >> encoding: >>> >> > >> >> > > UTF-8 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > OS name: "mac os x", >>> version: >>> >> > >> "10.9.5", >>> >> > >> >> > > arch: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> "x86_64", >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > family: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > "mac" >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at >>> 8:20 AM, >>> >> > >> Jacques >>> >> > >> >> > > >> Nadeau < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > jacq...@dremio.com> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Build back to normal. It >>> looks >>> >> > like >>> >> > >> >> the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> Apache >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> server >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> was >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > using >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > an >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > old >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > version of Maven. Once I >>> >> > switched >>> >> > >> to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> something >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > more >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > recent, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > build >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > passed. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > -- >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Jacques Nadeau >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > CTO and Co-Founder, >>> Dremio >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at >>> 7:02 >>> >> AM, >>> >> > >> >> Jacques >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > Nadeau < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > jacq...@dremio.com> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm... this merge >>> caused the >>> >> > >> Apache >>> >> > >> >> > > build >>> >> > >> >> > > >> to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > fail. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Investigating... >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Jacques Nadeau >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > CTO and Co-Founder, >>> Dremio >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 >>> at 6:31 >>> >> > AM, >>> >> > >> >> > Jacques >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > Nadeau < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > jacq...@dremio.com> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> I got clean >>> regression runs >>> >> > as >>> >> > >> >> well. >>> >> > >> >> > > I've >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > merged >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > patch. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Jason, you want to >>> start >>> >> the >>> >> > >> >> release >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > process? >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> -- >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Jacques Nadeau >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> CTO and Co-Founder, >>> Dremio >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 >>> at >>> >> 10:42 >>> >> > >> PM, >>> >> > >> >> > > Abhishek >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Girish < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > agir...@mapr.com >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Had two clean >>> Functional >>> >> > runs. >>> >> > >> >> TPC-H >>> >> > >> >> > > >> SF100 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > was >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> also >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > successful. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 >>> at >>> >> > 10:07 >>> >> > >> PM, >>> >> > >> >> > > rahul >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> challapalli < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>> >> challapallira...@gmail.com> >>> >> > >> >> wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Kicked off a >>> functional >>> >> > run >>> >> > >> with >>> >> > >> >> > > your >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > branch. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Will >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > let >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > you >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > know >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > once >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > it >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > finishes >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > - Rahul >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > On Wed, Jan 27, >>> 2016 at >>> >> > 9:56 >>> >> > >> PM, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> Jacques >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Nadeau < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > jacq...@dremio.com> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > 4196 was merged >>> >> today. I >>> >> > >> have >>> >> > >> >> an >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > updated >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> patch >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > for >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > 4291 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > that >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > is >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> ready. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Unfortunately, it >>> >> seems >>> >> > >> that >>> >> > >> >> > > >> something >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > isn't >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > working >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > with >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > our >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> extended >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > tests so I >>> haven't >>> >> been >>> >> > >> able >>> >> > >> >> to >>> >> > >> >> > > run >>> >> > >> >> > > >> an >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> extended >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > regression. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Unit >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> tests >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > pass. Is someone >>> else >>> >> > >> possibly >>> >> > >> >> > > able >>> >> > >> >> > > >> to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > run a >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > regression >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > suite >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > against >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > this >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > branch [1] so we >>> can >>> >> > >> confirm >>> >> > >> >> > > things >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > look >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> good >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> and >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > start >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > release >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > process? >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > thanks, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Jacques >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > [1] >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > https://github.com/jacques-n/drill/tree/DRILL-4291v2 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > -- >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Jacques Nadeau >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > CTO and >>> Co-Founder, >>> >> > Dremio >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > On Mon, Jan 25, >>> 2016 >>> >> at >>> >> > >> 11:20 >>> >> > >> >> > AM, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > Jacques >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Nadeau >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > jacq...@dremio.com >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > I think the >>> main >>> >> > things >>> >> > >> are >>> >> > >> >> > 4196 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> and >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > 4291 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > should >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > be >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > completed. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > I >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> know >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Amit >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > was able to >>> >> reproduce >>> >> > >> 4196 >>> >> > >> >> > > locally >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > this >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> weekend >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > so >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > I >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > think >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > we're >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> close >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > on >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > that. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > -- >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Jacques Nadeau >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > CTO and >>> Co-Founder, >>> >> > >> Dremio >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > On Mon, Jan >>> 25, 2016 >>> >> > at >>> >> > >> >> 10:14 >>> >> > >> >> > > AM, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > Zelaine >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Fong >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > zf...@maprtech.com >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> Any updates on >>> >> this? >>> >> > >> >> What's >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > blocking >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > us >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> from >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > taking >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > this >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > to a >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> vote -- >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> sort merge >>> join >>> >> > issues? >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> -- Zelaine >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> On Tue, Jan >>> 19, >>> >> 2016 >>> >> > at >>> >> > >> >> 4:18 >>> >> > >> >> > > PM, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > Jacques >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > Nadeau >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> jacq...@dremio.com> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Bumping this >>> >> > thread... >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Here are the >>> >> issues >>> >> > >> that >>> >> > >> >> > were >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> mentioned in >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > this >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > thread >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > along >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> with a >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > proposed >>> >> > >> categorization: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Release >>> Blockers >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-progress >>> Amit >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4190 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-progress >>> Amit >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4196 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Ready to >>> merge >>> >> > Jacques >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4246 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-review >>> Jinfeng >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4256 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-progress >>> >> Jacques >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4278 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Ready to >>> merge >>> >> > Laurent >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4285 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Nice to Have >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Open >>> Jason/Hakim >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4247 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-progress >>> Jason >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4203 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Open Jacques >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4266 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Ready to >>> merge >>> >> > Jacques >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4131 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > What do >>> others >>> >> > think? >>> >> > >> >> Let's >>> >> > >> >> > > try >>> >> > >> >> > > >> to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > get >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > blockers >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > wrapped >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > up >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> in >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> next >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > day or two >>> and >>> >> > start a >>> >> > >> >> > > release >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > vote... >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > -- >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Jacques >>> Nadeau >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > CTO and >>> >> Co-Founder, >>> >> > >> >> Dremio >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > On Mon, Jan >>> 4, >>> >> > 2016 at >>> >> > >> >> 1:48 >>> >> > >> >> > > PM, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > Jason >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > Altekruse >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > < >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >> > >> altekruseja...@gmail.com> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > wrote: >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Hello All, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > With the >>> >> > allocator >>> >> > >> >> > changes >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > merged >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > and >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > about >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > a >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > month >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > since >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> last >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > release >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > I think it >>> >> would >>> >> > be >>> >> > >> >> good >>> >> > >> >> > to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > start >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > a >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> vote >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > soon. I >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > would >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > like >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> volunteer >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > be release >>> >> > manager. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > I know >>> that >>> >> there >>> >> > >> were >>> >> > >> >> > some >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > issues >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> that >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > were >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > identified >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > after >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > transfer >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > patch was >>> >> > merged. I >>> >> > >> >> think >>> >> > >> >> > > that >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > these >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > issues >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > should >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > be >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > fixed >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> before >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > we >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > cut a >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > release >>> >> > candidate. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > From >>> looking at >>> >> > the >>> >> > >> >> > > associated >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > JIRAs >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> it >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > looked >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > like >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > there >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > was >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> a >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> possible >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > short >>> term fix >>> >> > just >>> >> > >> >> > > adjusting >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > max_query_memory_per_node >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > option, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> and >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > some more >>> >> > involved >>> >> > >> work >>> >> > >> >> > to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > change >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> how we >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > determine >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > correct >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > time >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > spill >>> during >>> >> > >> external >>> >> > >> >> > > sort. I >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> believe it >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > makes >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > sense >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > make >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > external >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > sort >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > work well >>> with >>> >> > the >>> >> > >> >> newly >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > improved >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> memory >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > accounting >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > before >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > cutting a >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > release, >>> but >>> >> I'm >>> >> > not >>> >> > >> >> sure >>> >> > >> >> > > how >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > much >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> work >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> is >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > left >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > to >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > be >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > done >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> there. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > [1] >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Please >>> respond >>> >> > with >>> >> > >> >> your >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > thoughts >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > on >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> a >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > release >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > soon >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > and >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > any >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> JIRAs >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > you >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > would >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > like to >>> include >>> >> > in >>> >> > >> the >>> >> > >> >> > > >> release. >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > [1] - >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4243 >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Thanks, >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Jason >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >> > > >>> >> > >> >> > >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> >> > -- Abdelhakim Deneche Software Engineer <http://www.mapr.com/> Now Available - Free Hadoop On-Demand Training <http://www.mapr.com/training?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Signature&utm_campaign=Free%20available>
