Fair enough. I meant having my public GPG key signed by someone already in the Apache web of trust.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Abdel Hakim Deneche <adene...@maprtech.com> wrote: > I have trouble understanding the meaning of "GPG signed" =P > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Jason Altekruse <altekruseja...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> A question for previous release managers. Jacques was thinking I may need >> to have my GPG signed to get linked into the Apache Web of Trust. Is this >> necessary for making a release? >> >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Jason Altekruse < >> altekruseja...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The only solution to this issue I have found is disabling the new plugin >>> to automatically enforce the size of the jdbc-all plugin. I don't know why >>> it is behaving differently when performing a release than it did during a >>> 'mvn install', but I have verified the correct size of the JAR manually and >>> am planning on pushing a candidate soon with the small change to disable >>> the automatic jar size enforcement. >>> >>> I will open a JIRA for getting this resolved after the release. >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Jinfeng Ni <jinfengn...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Good to hear this, Jacques & Jason. That makes feel relieved. :-) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Jason Altekruse >>>> <altekruseja...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > I don't think there was any issue with the merge either Jinfeng, I >>>> don't >>>> > think we need to close master. I had to step out for a few hours, but >>>> I am >>>> > working on finishing up the candidate right now. >>>> > >>>> > Having a weird RAT issue running the actual maven release command, >>>> it's >>>> > complaining about a dependency-reduced-pom.xml in the target >>>> directory of >>>> > jdbc-all lacking a license header (although target directories should >>>> be >>>> > ignored). Checking out the commit before the recent changes to the >>>> jdbc-all >>>> > exclusions seems to get rid of the issue, but the changes in the pom >>>> file >>>> > don't seem like they should be causing any problems. >>>> > >>>> > Still trying to debug and hoping to have a vote up tonight. >>>> > >>>> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Given how easy it is to create a branch off a random commit, I >>>> generally >>>> >> don't see a point in closing the master branch. I figure the release >>>> >> manager can propose where they'd like to fork if this type of thing >>>> comes >>>> >> up. >>>> >> >>>> >> Thanks for the feedback Jinfeng. Of course you're right about Venki's >>>> >> commit. My bad. >>>> >> >>>> >> -- >>>> >> Jacques Nadeau >>>> >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >>>> >> >>>> >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Jinfeng Ni <jinfengn...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> > Venki's backwards compatibility fix (commit id: >>>> >> > 03197d0) is before the partition pruning commit. So, it seems >>>> to be >>>> >> > fine to create a release candidate from 03197d0; no need to >>>> >> > cherry-pick. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > As for whether the partition pruning changes are risky, the >>>> pre-commit >>>> >> > run did not show any serious problems in the first run; all the >>>> plan >>>> >> > changes are expected, or expose some existing problem (drill-4279). >>>> >> > However, I agree that it impacts the main code path of query >>>> planning, >>>> >> > and I'm fine that we exclude the partition change from 1.5.0 >>>> release, >>>> >> > since it's merged right before we start a voting. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > I did not see any one mentioned that the master branch is closed, >>>> and >>>> >> > therefore assume it's still open for commits. I probably should >>>> have >>>> >> > asked whether the master was open for new patches before I merged >>>> the >>>> >> > commits. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Jacques Nadeau < >>>> jacq...@dremio.com> >>>> >> > wrote: >>>> >> > > Jinfeng, do you agree that the changes are risky? I was going >>>> mostly by >>>> >> > > commit messages. >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > Also just realized that the backwards compatibility fix to the >>>> storage >>>> >> > > plugin interface is after these. Could create release branch from >>>> >> > 03197d... >>>> >> > > and then cherry pick the Venki change. Or could keep them all. Or >>>> >> > > go without the compatibility fix.... >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > -- >>>> >> > > Jacques Nadeau >>>> >> > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Jinfeng Ni < >>>> jinfengn...@gmail.com> >>>> >> > wrote: >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > >> Hi Jason, >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> I'm fine that release 1.5.0 starts from 03197d0f2. One thing I >>>> need >>>> >> > >> point out is that the pre-commit test suite has some testcase's >>>> plan >>>> >> > >> output modified because of the partition pruning change. If we >>>> run >>>> >> > >> pre-commit against the candidate release for 1.5.0, we have to >>>> use a >>>> >> > >> prior version of pre-commit suite. >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Jason Altekruse >>>> >> > >> <altekruseja...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> > >> > That sounds reasonable to me. I'll start preparing a release >>>> >> > candidate. >>>> >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > Jinfeng, are you okay waiting for the next release to include >>>> this >>>> >> > >> change? >>>> >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Jacques Nadeau < >>>> jacq...@dremio.com >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >> wrote: >>>> >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> Hey Jason, >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> Can you start the release vote? We've let this drag on too >>>> long. >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> I suggest we start from 03197d0f2. It seems like the >>>> partition >>>> >> > pruning >>>> >> > >> >> changes are pretty complicated and on a pretty main path to >>>> add >>>> >> right >>>> >> > >> >> before the vote. Since Hsuan's fix (pr 349) hasn't been >>>> reviewed, I >>>> >> > >> think >>>> >> > >> >> we should start the vote without it. >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> Jacques >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> -- >>>> >> > >> >> Jacques Nadeau >>>> >> > >> >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Hsuan Yi Chu < >>>> hyi...@maprtech.com >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >> wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> > Yes, just send a pull request. >>>> >> > >> >> > https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/349 >>>> >> > >> >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > Can Jinfeng review it? >>>> >> > >> >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >>>> >> > >> >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Jinfeng Ni < >>>> >> jinfengn...@gmail.com >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > Sean probably is quite close to find a fix for this >>>> issue. >>>> >> Let's >>>> >> > see >>>> >> > >> >> > > whether he can post a patch soon. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:29 PM, rahul challapalli >>>> >> > >> >> > > <challapallira...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > > DRILL-4323 only happens when assertions are turned on >>>> (my >>>> >> > install >>>> >> > >> >> > script >>>> >> > >> >> > > > automatically enables assertions). >>>> >> > >> >> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > > - Rahul >>>> >> > >> >> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Zelaine Fong < >>>> >> > >> zf...@maprtech.com> >>>> >> > >> >> > > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> Rahul, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> Let us know if you can reproduce the issue with >>>> assertions >>>> >> > turned >>>> >> > >> >> OFF. >>>> >> > >> >> > > If >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> you cannot, then I think this should not be a blocker >>>> for >>>> >> 1.5, >>>> >> > >> and >>>> >> > >> >> > Hsuan >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> will continue to look into fixing this. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> -- Zelaine >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Krystal Nguyen < >>>> >> > >> >> > kngu...@maprtech.com> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > I do see the same error with assertion turned on. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Jinfeng Ni < >>>> >> > >> >> jinfengn...@gmail.com> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > Krystal, by any chance, did you turn on assertion >>>> when >>>> >> you >>>> >> > >> start >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > drillbit? >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > I think the error in drill-4323 will be raised >>>> when >>>> >> > >> assertion = >>>> >> > >> >> > on. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Krystal Nguyen < >>>> >> > >> >> > > kngu...@maprtech.com> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > I am running drill-1.4 and is able to run >>>> count(*) >>>> >> > >> >> successfully. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > 0: jdbc:drill:zk=10.10.100.113:5181,10.10.100> >>>> alter >>>> >> > >> session >>>> >> > >> >> > set >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > `store.hive.optimize_scan_with_native_readers` >>>> = true; >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > >>>> >> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------+ >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > | ok | summary >>>> >> > >> >> > | >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > >>>> >> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------+ >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > | true | >>>> store.hive.optimize_scan_with_native_readers >>>> >> > >> >> > updated. | >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > >>>> >> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------+ >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > 1 row selected (0.374 seconds) >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > 0: jdbc:drill:zk=10.10.100.113:5181,10.10.100> >>>> select >>>> >> > >> >> count(*) >>>> >> > >> >> > > from >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > lineitem_parquet_partitioned_hive_string; >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > +---------+ >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > | EXPR$0 | >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > +---------+ >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > | 60175 | >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > +---------+ >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > 1 row selected (2.986 seconds) >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Jinfeng Ni < >>>> >> > >> >> > > jinfengn...@gmail.com> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Venki and I did some investigation for >>>> DRILL-4323. >>>> >> The >>>> >> > >> issue >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> reported >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> in DRILL-4323 seems to happen on 1.4.0 release >>>> as >>>> >> well. >>>> >> > >> Seems >>>> >> > >> >> > to >>>> >> > >> >> > > us >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> this is not a regression from 1.4.0; it's a >>>> >> regression >>>> >> > >> from >>>> >> > >> >> > 1.3.0 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> probably. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> DRILL-4083 makes the planner to use >>>> >> > DrillHiveNativeReader >>>> >> > >> in >>>> >> > >> >> > > stead >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> of >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> HiveReader for "select count(*) from >>>> hive_table" >>>> >> query. >>>> >> > >> >> > However, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Project after the scan produces empty schema. >>>> Before >>>> >> > >> >> > DRILL-4083, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Drill uses HiveScan, which works fine. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Jason >>>> Altekruse >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> <altekruseja...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > We could revert the change to the >>>> StoragePlugin >>>> >> > >> interface >>>> >> > >> >> to >>>> >> > >> >> > > add >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > getLogicalOptimizerRules >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > and getPhysicalOptimizerRules, and only put >>>> those >>>> >> in >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> AbstractStoragePlugin >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > with default implementations. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > We could then update the docs to tell users >>>> to not >>>> >> > >> >> implement >>>> >> > >> >> > > the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> interface >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > directly, and instead extend the abstract >>>> class, >>>> >> > which I >>>> >> > >> >> > > believe >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > would >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > allow us to make changes like this in the >>>> future >>>> >> > without >>>> >> > >> >> > > breaking >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> plugins. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > At a major release version we could then >>>> just pull >>>> >> up >>>> >> > >> all >>>> >> > >> >> of >>>> >> > >> >> > > the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> new >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > methods we added to the abstract class into >>>> the >>>> >> > >> interface, >>>> >> > >> >> or >>>> >> > >> >> > > just >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > get >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> rid >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > of it all-together. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Venki >>>> Korukanti < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> venki.koruka...@gmail.com> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Here is the partial fix: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> https://github.com/vkorukanti/drill/commit/6646b0d08df274a22dff870ad5e6f6914b10fa0b >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> If the existing StragePlugins are >>>> implementing >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > AbstractStoragePlugin >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> class >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> this fix should resolve the backward compat >>>> issue. >>>> >> > If >>>> >> > >> they >>>> >> > >> >> > are >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> implementing >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> StoragePlugin interface directly then it >>>> won't >>>> >> > resolve >>>> >> > >> the >>>> >> > >> >> > > issue. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > Not >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> sure >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> how to handle it in that case. Let me know >>>> if >>>> >> there >>>> >> > any >>>> >> > >> >> ways >>>> >> > >> >> > > to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > resolve >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> this issue completely. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Thanks >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Venki >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Aman Sinha >>>> < >>>> >> > >> >> > > asi...@maprtech.com >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > I was able to do the build with maven >>>> 3.3.9 >>>> >> (after >>>> >> > >> doing >>>> >> > >> >> > > 'brew >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > install >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > maven'). Here are my env variables >>>> related to >>>> >> > maven: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>>> M2_HOME=/usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.3.9/libexec >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>>> M2=/usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.3.9/libexec/bin >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx2048m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Jacques >>>> Nadeau >>>> >> < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > jacq...@dremio.com> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > Aman, for reference on the Maven version >>>> >> issue. >>>> >> > You >>>> >> > >> >> can >>>> >> > >> >> > > see >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> output >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> of >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > the shade plugin between the two Apache >>>> >> Builds. >>>> >> > If >>>> >> > >> you >>>> >> > >> >> > > search >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > for >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > maven-shade-plugin you'll see that >>>> build 647 >>>> >> > (maven >>>> >> > >> >> > 3.0.5) >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > fails >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> because >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > it >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > includes a bunch of hadoop (and other >>>> >> libraries >>>> >> > >> that >>>> >> > >> >> are >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> listed >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > as >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> being >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > excluded). If you look at build 648 >>>> (maven >>>> >> > 3.3.3), >>>> >> > >> >> those >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> items >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > are >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > included >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > so that the build completes >>>> successfully. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/drill-scm/647/consoleText >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/drill-scm/648/consoleText >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > -- >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > Jacques Nadeau >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:01 PM, rahul >>>> >> > challapalli >>>> >> > >> < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > challapallira...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > Jason, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > As of now I haven't narrowed down the >>>> exact >>>> >> > >> commit >>>> >> > >> >> > which >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > caused >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > DRILL-4323 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > and I do not know the scope of the >>>> fix. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > - Rahul >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Jason >>>> >> > Altekruse >>>> >> > >> < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > altekruseja...@gmail.com >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > I think it makes sense to wait for >>>> Venki's >>>> >> > fix >>>> >> > >> of >>>> >> > >> >> > the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> API, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > as >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > releasing a >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > version with the change would make >>>> >> > >> >> > > reverting/refactoring >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > API >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > breaking >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > change less useful. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > Do you have any idea about the >>>> scope of >>>> >> > fixing >>>> >> > >> the >>>> >> > >> >> > > hive >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > native >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > reader, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > or >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > which change since the 1.4 release >>>> broke >>>> >> > it? Is >>>> >> > >> >> > > someone >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> available >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > look >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > at it today? >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:33 PM, >>>> rahul >>>> >> > >> >> challapalli < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > challapallira...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > Just found an issue with hive >>>> native >>>> >> > parquet >>>> >> > >> >> > reader >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> (DRILL-4323). >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > This >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > is a >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > regression from 1.4 and in my >>>> opinion >>>> >> > should >>>> >> > >> be >>>> >> > >> >> > > treated >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > as >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > a >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > blocker. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > - Rahul >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:12 PM, >>>> Venki >>>> >> > >> >> Korukanti < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > venki.koruka...@gmail.com> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Sorry I didn't realize I was >>>> breaking >>>> >> > the >>>> >> > >> >> public >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > interface >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> API. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > Let >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > me >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > work >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > on a patch to make it backward >>>> >> > compatible. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Thanks >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Venki >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:54 >>>> PM, >>>> >> Steven >>>> >> > >> >> > Phillips >>>> >> > >> >> > > < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > ste...@dremio.com >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > I just wanted to bring up an >>>> issue >>>> >> > that I >>>> >> > >> >> just >>>> >> > >> >> > > now >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> discovered, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > that >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > has >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > caused me a fair amount of >>>> grief. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/300/commits >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > DRILL-4198 changes a >>>> user-facing >>>> >> API, >>>> >> > and >>>> >> > >> >> > causes >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> StoragePlugins >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > that >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > were >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > compiled against currently >>>> released >>>> >> > >> versions >>>> >> > >> >> > of >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> Drill >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> no >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > longer >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > functional properly. I would >>>> prefer >>>> >> > that >>>> >> > >> >> this >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > breaking >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> change >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > be >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > modified >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > to be backward compatible if >>>> >> possible. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:23 >>>> AM, >>>> >> > Jason >>>> >> > >> >> > > Altekruse < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > altekruseja...@gmail.com> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Hi Aman, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > This is the failure that he >>>> was >>>> >> > >> seeing. He >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> figured >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > out >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> that >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > new >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > exclusions in jdbc-all were >>>> not >>>> >> > being >>>> >> > >> >> > > respected >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > when >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > build >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > was >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > run >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > with >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > an older Maven version, >>>> causing >>>> >> the >>>> >> > jar >>>> >> > >> >> size >>>> >> > >> >> > > to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > increase >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > significantly. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > He >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > added an enforcer to make >>>> sure the >>>> >> > JAR >>>> >> > >> >> > didn't >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> grow >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > unexpectedly. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > Can >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > you >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > try to update your maven >>>> version >>>> >> and >>>> >> > >> >> re-run >>>> >> > >> >> > > the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > build? >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > - Jason >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at >>>> 11:18 AM, >>>> >> > Aman >>>> >> > >> >> > Sinha < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > asi...@maprtech.com> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Jacques, I am getting the >>>> >> > following >>>> >> > >> >> build >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> failure >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > on >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > latest >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > master >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > branch...is this what you >>>> saw >>>> >> for >>>> >> > the >>>> >> > >> >> > Apache >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > build >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > ? >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> My >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > mvn >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > version >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > output >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > is shown below. Should >>>> we all >>>> >> be >>>> >> > >> >> > upgrading >>>> >> > >> >> > > to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> a >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > newer >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> mvn >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > ? >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > [INFO] --- >>>> >> > >> >> > > maven-enforcer-plugin:1.3.1:enforce >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> (enforce-jdbc-jar-compactness) @ >>>> >> > >> >> > > drill-jdbc-all >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > --- >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > [WARNING] Rule 0: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.RequireFilesSize >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > failed >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > with message: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > The file >>>> >> > >> >> drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >>>> >> > >> >> > > is >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > outside >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > expected >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > size >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > range. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > This is >>>> likely >>>> >> > due >>>> >> > >> to >>>> >> > >> >> > you >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > adding >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > new >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > dependencies >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > a >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > java-exec and not >>>> updating the >>>> >> > >> excludes >>>> >> > >> >> in >>>> >> > >> >> > > this >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> module. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > This >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > is >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > important >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > as it minimizes the size >>>> of the >>>> >> > >> >> dependency >>>> >> > >> >> > > of >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > Drill >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > application >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > users. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> /Users/asinha/incubator-drill/exec/jdbc-all/target/drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > size (44664121) too >>>> large. Max. >>>> >> is >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> 20000000/Users/asinha/incubator-drill/exec/jdbc-all/target/drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > Administrators-MacBook-Pro-144:incubator-drill >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > asinha$ >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> mvn >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > --version >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Apache Maven 3.0.5 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>>> (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > 2013-02-19 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > 05:51:28-0800) >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Maven home: >>>> >> > >> /opt/local/share/java/maven3 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Java version: 1.7.0_45, >>>> vendor: >>>> >> > >> Oracle >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > Corporation >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Java home: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >>>> >> > /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_45.jdk/Contents/Home/jre >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Default locale: en_US, >>>> platform >>>> >> > >> >> encoding: >>>> >> > >> >> > > UTF-8 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > OS name: "mac os x", >>>> version: >>>> >> > >> "10.9.5", >>>> >> > >> >> > > arch: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> "x86_64", >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > family: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > "mac" >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at >>>> 8:20 AM, >>>> >> > >> Jacques >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> Nadeau < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > jacq...@dremio.com> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Build back to normal. >>>> It looks >>>> >> > like >>>> >> > >> >> the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> Apache >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> server >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> was >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > using >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > an >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > old >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > version of Maven. Once I >>>> >> > switched >>>> >> > >> to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> something >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > more >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > recent, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > build >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > passed. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > -- >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Jacques Nadeau >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > CTO and Co-Founder, >>>> Dremio >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at >>>> 7:02 >>>> >> AM, >>>> >> > >> >> Jacques >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > Nadeau < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > jacq...@dremio.com> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm... this merge >>>> caused the >>>> >> > >> Apache >>>> >> > >> >> > > build >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > fail. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Investigating... >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Jacques Nadeau >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > CTO and Co-Founder, >>>> Dremio >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 >>>> at 6:31 >>>> >> > AM, >>>> >> > >> >> > Jacques >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > Nadeau < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > jacq...@dremio.com> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> I got clean >>>> regression runs >>>> >> > as >>>> >> > >> >> well. >>>> >> > >> >> > > I've >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > merged >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > patch. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Jason, you want to >>>> start >>>> >> the >>>> >> > >> >> release >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > process? >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> -- >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Jacques Nadeau >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> CTO and Co-Founder, >>>> Dremio >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 >>>> at >>>> >> 10:42 >>>> >> > >> PM, >>>> >> > >> >> > > Abhishek >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Girish < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > agir...@mapr.com >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Had two clean >>>> Functional >>>> >> > runs. >>>> >> > >> >> TPC-H >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> SF100 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > was >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> also >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > successful. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, >>>> 2016 at >>>> >> > 10:07 >>>> >> > >> PM, >>>> >> > >> >> > > rahul >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> challapalli < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>>> >> challapallira...@gmail.com> >>>> >> > >> >> wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Kicked off a >>>> functional >>>> >> > run >>>> >> > >> with >>>> >> > >> >> > > your >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > branch. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Will >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > let >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > you >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > know >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > once >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > it >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > finishes >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > - Rahul >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > On Wed, Jan 27, >>>> 2016 at >>>> >> > 9:56 >>>> >> > >> PM, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> Jacques >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Nadeau < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > jacq...@dremio.com> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > 4196 was merged >>>> >> today. I >>>> >> > >> have >>>> >> > >> >> an >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > updated >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> patch >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > for >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > 4291 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > that >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > is >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> ready. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Unfortunately, >>>> it >>>> >> seems >>>> >> > >> that >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> something >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > isn't >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > working >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > with >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > our >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> extended >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > tests so I >>>> haven't >>>> >> been >>>> >> > >> able >>>> >> > >> >> to >>>> >> > >> >> > > run >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> an >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> extended >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > regression. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Unit >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> tests >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > pass. Is >>>> someone else >>>> >> > >> possibly >>>> >> > >> >> > > able >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > run a >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > regression >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > suite >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > against >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > this >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > branch [1] so >>>> we can >>>> >> > >> confirm >>>> >> > >> >> > > things >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > look >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> good >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> and >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > start >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > release >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > process? >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > thanks, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Jacques >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > [1] >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > https://github.com/jacques-n/drill/tree/DRILL-4291v2 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > -- >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Jacques Nadeau >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > CTO and >>>> Co-Founder, >>>> >> > Dremio >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > On Mon, Jan 25, >>>> 2016 >>>> >> at >>>> >> > >> 11:20 >>>> >> > >> >> > AM, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > Jacques >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Nadeau >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > jacq...@dremio.com >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > I think the >>>> main >>>> >> > things >>>> >> > >> are >>>> >> > >> >> > 4196 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> and >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > 4291 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > should >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > be >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > completed. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > I >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> know >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Amit >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > was able to >>>> >> reproduce >>>> >> > >> 4196 >>>> >> > >> >> > > locally >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > this >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> weekend >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > so >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > I >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > think >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > we're >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> close >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > on >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > that. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > -- >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Jacques Nadeau >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > CTO and >>>> Co-Founder, >>>> >> > >> Dremio >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > On Mon, Jan >>>> 25, 2016 >>>> >> > at >>>> >> > >> >> 10:14 >>>> >> > >> >> > > AM, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > Zelaine >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Fong >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > zf...@maprtech.com >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> Any updates >>>> on >>>> >> this? >>>> >> > >> >> What's >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > blocking >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > us >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> from >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > taking >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > this >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > to a >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> vote -- >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> sort merge >>>> join >>>> >> > issues? >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> -- Zelaine >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> On Tue, Jan >>>> 19, >>>> >> 2016 >>>> >> > at >>>> >> > >> >> 4:18 >>>> >> > >> >> > > PM, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > Jacques >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > Nadeau >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> jacq...@dremio.com> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Bumping >>>> this >>>> >> > thread... >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Here are >>>> the >>>> >> issues >>>> >> > >> that >>>> >> > >> >> > were >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> mentioned in >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > this >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > thread >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > along >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> with a >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > proposed >>>> >> > >> categorization: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Release >>>> Blockers >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>>> In-progress Amit >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4190 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>>> In-progress Amit >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4196 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Ready to >>>> merge >>>> >> > Jacques >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4246 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-review >>>> Jinfeng >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4256 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-progress >>>> >> Jacques >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4278 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Ready to >>>> merge >>>> >> > Laurent >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4285 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Nice to >>>> Have >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Open >>>> Jason/Hakim >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4247 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>>> In-progress Jason >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4203 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Open >>>> Jacques >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4266 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Ready to >>>> merge >>>> >> > Jacques >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4131 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > What do >>>> others >>>> >> > think? >>>> >> > >> >> Let's >>>> >> > >> >> > > try >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > get >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > blockers >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > wrapped >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > up >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> in >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> next >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > day or two >>>> and >>>> >> > start a >>>> >> > >> >> > > release >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > vote... >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > -- >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Jacques >>>> Nadeau >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > CTO and >>>> >> Co-Founder, >>>> >> > >> >> Dremio >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > On Mon, >>>> Jan 4, >>>> >> > 2016 at >>>> >> > >> >> 1:48 >>>> >> > >> >> > > PM, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > Jason >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > Altekruse >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > < >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >>>> >> > >> altekruseja...@gmail.com> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > wrote: >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Hello >>>> All, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > With the >>>> >> > allocator >>>> >> > >> >> > changes >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > merged >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > and >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > about >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > a >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > month >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > since >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> last >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > release >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > I think >>>> it >>>> >> would >>>> >> > be >>>> >> > >> >> good >>>> >> > >> >> > to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > start >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > a >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> vote >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > soon. I >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > would >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > like >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> volunteer >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > be >>>> release >>>> >> > manager. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > I know >>>> that >>>> >> there >>>> >> > >> were >>>> >> > >> >> > some >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > issues >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> that >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > were >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > identified >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > after >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > transfer >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > patch was >>>> >> > merged. I >>>> >> > >> >> think >>>> >> > >> >> > > that >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > these >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > issues >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > should >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > be >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > fixed >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> before >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > we >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > cut a >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > release >>>> >> > candidate. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > From >>>> looking at >>>> >> > the >>>> >> > >> >> > > associated >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > JIRAs >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> it >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > looked >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > like >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > there >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > was >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> a >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> possible >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > short >>>> term fix >>>> >> > just >>>> >> > >> >> > > adjusting >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > max_query_memory_per_node >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > option, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> and >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > some more >>>> >> > involved >>>> >> > >> work >>>> >> > >> >> > to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > change >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> how we >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > determine >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > correct >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > time >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > spill >>>> during >>>> >> > >> external >>>> >> > >> >> > > sort. I >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> believe it >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > makes >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > sense >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > make >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > external >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > sort >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > work >>>> well with >>>> >> > the >>>> >> > >> >> newly >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > improved >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> memory >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > accounting >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > before >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > cutting a >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > release, >>>> but >>>> >> I'm >>>> >> > not >>>> >> > >> >> sure >>>> >> > >> >> > > how >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > much >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> work >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> is >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > left >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > to >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > be >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > done >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> there. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > [1] >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Please >>>> respond >>>> >> > with >>>> >> > >> >> your >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > thoughts >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > on >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> a >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > release >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > soon >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > and >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > any >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> JIRAs >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > you >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > would >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > like to >>>> include >>>> >> > in >>>> >> > >> the >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> release. >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > [1] - >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4243 >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Thanks, >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Jason >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > > >>>> >> > >> >> > >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > > Abdelhakim Deneche > > Software Engineer > > <http://www.mapr.com/> > > > Now Available - Free Hadoop On-Demand Training > <http://www.mapr.com/training?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Signature&utm_campaign=Free%20available> >
