Good to hear this, Jacques & Jason. That makes feel relieved. :-)
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Jason Altekruse <altekruseja...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think there was any issue with the merge either Jinfeng, I don't > think we need to close master. I had to step out for a few hours, but I am > working on finishing up the candidate right now. > > Having a weird RAT issue running the actual maven release command, it's > complaining about a dependency-reduced-pom.xml in the target directory of > jdbc-all lacking a license header (although target directories should be > ignored). Checking out the commit before the recent changes to the jdbc-all > exclusions seems to get rid of the issue, but the changes in the pom file > don't seem like they should be causing any problems. > > Still trying to debug and hoping to have a vote up tonight. > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> wrote: > >> Given how easy it is to create a branch off a random commit, I generally >> don't see a point in closing the master branch. I figure the release >> manager can propose where they'd like to fork if this type of thing comes >> up. >> >> Thanks for the feedback Jinfeng. Of course you're right about Venki's >> commit. My bad. >> >> -- >> Jacques Nadeau >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Jinfeng Ni <jinfengn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Venki's backwards compatibility fix (commit id: >> > 03197d0) is before the partition pruning commit. So, it seems to be >> > fine to create a release candidate from 03197d0; no need to >> > cherry-pick. >> > >> > As for whether the partition pruning changes are risky, the pre-commit >> > run did not show any serious problems in the first run; all the plan >> > changes are expected, or expose some existing problem (drill-4279). >> > However, I agree that it impacts the main code path of query planning, >> > and I'm fine that we exclude the partition change from 1.5.0 release, >> > since it's merged right before we start a voting. >> > >> > I did not see any one mentioned that the master branch is closed, and >> > therefore assume it's still open for commits. I probably should have >> > asked whether the master was open for new patches before I merged the >> > commits. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> >> > wrote: >> > > Jinfeng, do you agree that the changes are risky? I was going mostly by >> > > commit messages. >> > > >> > > Also just realized that the backwards compatibility fix to the storage >> > > plugin interface is after these. Could create release branch from >> > 03197d... >> > > and then cherry pick the Venki change. Or could keep them all. Or >> > > go without the compatibility fix.... >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Jacques Nadeau >> > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> > > >> > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Jinfeng Ni <jinfengn...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hi Jason, >> > >> >> > >> I'm fine that release 1.5.0 starts from 03197d0f2. One thing I need >> > >> point out is that the pre-commit test suite has some testcase's plan >> > >> output modified because of the partition pruning change. If we run >> > >> pre-commit against the candidate release for 1.5.0, we have to use a >> > >> prior version of pre-commit suite. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Jason Altekruse >> > >> <altekruseja...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > That sounds reasonable to me. I'll start preparing a release >> > candidate. >> > >> > >> > >> > Jinfeng, are you okay waiting for the next release to include this >> > >> change? >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com >> > >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> >> Hey Jason, >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Can you start the release vote? We've let this drag on too long. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> I suggest we start from 03197d0f2. It seems like the partition >> > pruning >> > >> >> changes are pretty complicated and on a pretty main path to add >> right >> > >> >> before the vote. Since Hsuan's fix (pr 349) hasn't been reviewed, I >> > >> think >> > >> >> we should start the vote without it. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Jacques >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> -- >> > >> >> Jacques Nadeau >> > >> >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> > >> >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Hsuan Yi Chu <hyi...@maprtech.com >> > >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > Yes, just send a pull request. >> > >> >> > https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/349 >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > Can Jinfeng review it? >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Jinfeng Ni < >> jinfengn...@gmail.com >> > > >> > >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > > Sean probably is quite close to find a fix for this issue. >> Let's >> > see >> > >> >> > > whether he can post a patch soon. >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:29 PM, rahul challapalli >> > >> >> > > <challapallira...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> > > > DRILL-4323 only happens when assertions are turned on (my >> > install >> > >> >> > script >> > >> >> > > > automatically enables assertions). >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > - Rahul >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Zelaine Fong < >> > >> zf...@maprtech.com> >> > >> >> > > wrote: >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> Rahul, >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> Let us know if you can reproduce the issue with assertions >> > turned >> > >> >> OFF. >> > >> >> > > If >> > >> >> > > >> you cannot, then I think this should not be a blocker for >> 1.5, >> > >> and >> > >> >> > Hsuan >> > >> >> > > >> will continue to look into fixing this. >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> -- Zelaine >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Krystal Nguyen < >> > >> >> > kngu...@maprtech.com> >> > >> >> > > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > I do see the same error with assertion turned on. >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Jinfeng Ni < >> > >> >> jinfengn...@gmail.com> >> > >> >> > > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > Krystal, by any chance, did you turn on assertion when >> you >> > >> start >> > >> >> > > >> > drillbit? >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > I think the error in drill-4323 will be raised when >> > >> assertion = >> > >> >> > on. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Krystal Nguyen < >> > >> >> > > kngu...@maprtech.com> >> > >> >> > > >> > > wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > > I am running drill-1.4 and is able to run count(*) >> > >> >> successfully. >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > > 0: jdbc:drill:zk=10.10.100.113:5181,10.10.100> alter >> > >> session >> > >> >> > set >> > >> >> > > >> > > > `store.hive.optimize_scan_with_native_readers` = true; >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > >> >> > >> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------+ >> > >> >> > > >> > > > | ok | summary >> > >> >> > | >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > >> >> > >> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------+ >> > >> >> > > >> > > > | true | store.hive.optimize_scan_with_native_readers >> > >> >> > updated. | >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > >> >> > >> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------+ >> > >> >> > > >> > > > 1 row selected (0.374 seconds) >> > >> >> > > >> > > > 0: jdbc:drill:zk=10.10.100.113:5181,10.10.100> select >> > >> >> count(*) >> > >> >> > > from >> > >> >> > > >> > > > lineitem_parquet_partitioned_hive_string; >> > >> >> > > >> > > > +---------+ >> > >> >> > > >> > > > | EXPR$0 | >> > >> >> > > >> > > > +---------+ >> > >> >> > > >> > > > | 60175 | >> > >> >> > > >> > > > +---------+ >> > >> >> > > >> > > > 1 row selected (2.986 seconds) >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Jinfeng Ni < >> > >> >> > > jinfengn...@gmail.com> >> > >> >> > > >> > > wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Venki and I did some investigation for DRILL-4323. >> The >> > >> issue >> > >> >> > > >> reported >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> in DRILL-4323 seems to happen on 1.4.0 release as >> well. >> > >> Seems >> > >> >> > to >> > >> >> > > us >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> this is not a regression from 1.4.0; it's a >> regression >> > >> from >> > >> >> > 1.3.0 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> probably. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> DRILL-4083 makes the planner to use >> > DrillHiveNativeReader >> > >> in >> > >> >> > > stead >> > >> >> > > >> of >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> HiveReader for "select count(*) from hive_table" >> query. >> > >> >> > However, >> > >> >> > > >> the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Project after the scan produces empty schema. Before >> > >> >> > DRILL-4083, >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Drill uses HiveScan, which works fine. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Jason Altekruse >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> <altekruseja...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > We could revert the change to the StoragePlugin >> > >> interface >> > >> >> to >> > >> >> > > add >> > >> >> > > >> the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > getLogicalOptimizerRules >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > and getPhysicalOptimizerRules, and only put those >> in >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> AbstractStoragePlugin >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > with default implementations. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > We could then update the docs to tell users to not >> > >> >> implement >> > >> >> > > the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> interface >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > directly, and instead extend the abstract class, >> > which I >> > >> >> > > believe >> > >> >> > > >> > would >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > allow us to make changes like this in the future >> > without >> > >> >> > > breaking >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> plugins. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > At a major release version we could then just pull >> up >> > >> all >> > >> >> of >> > >> >> > > the >> > >> >> > > >> new >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > methods we added to the abstract class into the >> > >> interface, >> > >> >> or >> > >> >> > > just >> > >> >> > > >> > get >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> rid >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > of it all-together. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Venki Korukanti < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> venki.koruka...@gmail.com> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Here is the partial fix: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> https://github.com/vkorukanti/drill/commit/6646b0d08df274a22dff870ad5e6f6914b10fa0b >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> If the existing StragePlugins are implementing >> > >> >> > > >> > AbstractStoragePlugin >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> class >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> this fix should resolve the backward compat issue. >> > If >> > >> they >> > >> >> > are >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> implementing >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> StoragePlugin interface directly then it won't >> > resolve >> > >> the >> > >> >> > > issue. >> > >> >> > > >> > Not >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> sure >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> how to handle it in that case. Let me know if >> there >> > any >> > >> >> ways >> > >> >> > > to >> > >> >> > > >> > > resolve >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> this issue completely. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Thanks >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Venki >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Aman Sinha < >> > >> >> > > asi...@maprtech.com >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > I was able to do the build with maven 3.3.9 >> (after >> > >> doing >> > >> >> > > 'brew >> > >> >> > > >> > > install >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > maven'). Here are my env variables related to >> > maven: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > M2_HOME=/usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.3.9/libexec >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > M2=/usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.3.9/libexec/bin >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx2048m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Jacques Nadeau >> < >> > >> >> > > >> > > jacq...@dremio.com> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > Aman, for reference on the Maven version >> issue. >> > You >> > >> >> can >> > >> >> > > see >> > >> >> > > >> the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> output >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> of >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > the shade plugin between the two Apache >> Builds. >> > If >> > >> you >> > >> >> > > search >> > >> >> > > >> > for >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > maven-shade-plugin you'll see that build 647 >> > (maven >> > >> >> > 3.0.5) >> > >> >> > > >> > fails >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> because >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > it >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > includes a bunch of hadoop (and other >> libraries >> > >> that >> > >> >> are >> > >> >> > > >> listed >> > >> >> > > >> > > as >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> being >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > excluded). If you look at build 648 (maven >> > 3.3.3), >> > >> >> those >> > >> >> > > >> items >> > >> >> > > >> > > are >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > included >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > so that the build completes successfully. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/drill-scm/647/consoleText >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/drill-scm/648/consoleText >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > -- >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > Jacques Nadeau >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:01 PM, rahul >> > challapalli >> > >> < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > challapallira...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > Jason, >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > As of now I haven't narrowed down the exact >> > >> commit >> > >> >> > which >> > >> >> > > >> > caused >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > DRILL-4323 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > and I do not know the scope of the fix. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > - Rahul >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Jason >> > Altekruse >> > >> < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > altekruseja...@gmail.com >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > I think it makes sense to wait for Venki's >> > fix >> > >> of >> > >> >> > the >> > >> >> > > >> API, >> > >> >> > > >> > as >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > releasing a >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > version with the change would make >> > >> >> > > reverting/refactoring >> > >> >> > > >> > the >> > >> >> > > >> > > API >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > breaking >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > change less useful. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > Do you have any idea about the scope of >> > fixing >> > >> the >> > >> >> > > hive >> > >> >> > > >> > > native >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > reader, >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > or >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > which change since the 1.4 release broke >> > it? Is >> > >> >> > > someone >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> available >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> to >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > look >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > at it today? >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:33 PM, rahul >> > >> >> challapalli < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > challapallira...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > Just found an issue with hive native >> > parquet >> > >> >> > reader >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> (DRILL-4323). >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > This >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > is a >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > regression from 1.4 and in my opinion >> > should >> > >> be >> > >> >> > > treated >> > >> >> > > >> > as >> > >> >> > > >> > > a >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > blocker. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > - Rahul >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Venki >> > >> >> Korukanti < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > venki.koruka...@gmail.com> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Sorry I didn't realize I was breaking >> > the >> > >> >> public >> > >> >> > > >> > > interface >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> API. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > Let >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > me >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > work >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > on a patch to make it backward >> > compatible. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Thanks >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Venki >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:54 PM, >> Steven >> > >> >> > Phillips >> > >> >> > > < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > ste...@dremio.com >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > I just wanted to bring up an issue >> > that I >> > >> >> just >> > >> >> > > now >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> discovered, >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > that >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > has >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > caused me a fair amount of grief. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/300/commits >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > DRILL-4198 changes a user-facing >> API, >> > and >> > >> >> > causes >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> StoragePlugins >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > that >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > were >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > compiled against currently released >> > >> versions >> > >> >> > of >> > >> >> > > >> Drill >> > >> >> > > >> > > to >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> no >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > longer >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > functional properly. I would prefer >> > that >> > >> >> this >> > >> >> > > >> > breaking >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> change >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > be >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > modified >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > to be backward compatible if >> possible. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:23 AM, >> > Jason >> > >> >> > > Altekruse < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > altekruseja...@gmail.com> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Hi Aman, >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > This is the failure that he was >> > >> seeing. He >> > >> >> > > >> figured >> > >> >> > > >> > > out >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> that >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > new >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > exclusions in jdbc-all were not >> > being >> > >> >> > > respected >> > >> >> > > >> > when >> > >> >> > > >> > > the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > build >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > was >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > run >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > with >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > an older Maven version, causing >> the >> > jar >> > >> >> size >> > >> >> > > to >> > >> >> > > >> > > increase >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > significantly. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > He >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > added an enforcer to make sure the >> > JAR >> > >> >> > didn't >> > >> >> > > >> grow >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > unexpectedly. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > Can >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > you >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > try to update your maven version >> and >> > >> >> re-run >> > >> >> > > the >> > >> >> > > >> > > build? >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > - Jason >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:18 AM, >> > Aman >> > >> >> > Sinha < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > asi...@maprtech.com> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Jacques, I am getting the >> > following >> > >> >> build >> > >> >> > > >> failure >> > >> >> > > >> > > on >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > latest >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > master >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > branch...is this what you saw >> for >> > the >> > >> >> > Apache >> > >> >> > > >> > build >> > >> >> > > >> > > ? >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> My >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > mvn >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > version >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > output >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > is shown below. Should we all >> be >> > >> >> > upgrading >> > >> >> > > to >> > >> >> > > >> a >> > >> >> > > >> > > newer >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> mvn >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > ? >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > [INFO] --- >> > >> >> > > maven-enforcer-plugin:1.3.1:enforce >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > (enforce-jdbc-jar-compactness) @ >> > >> >> > > drill-jdbc-all >> > >> >> > > >> > --- >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > [WARNING] Rule 0: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > >> >> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.RequireFilesSize >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > failed >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > with message: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > The file >> > >> >> drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >> > >> >> > > is >> > >> >> > > >> > > outside >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > expected >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > size >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > range. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > This is likely >> > due >> > >> to >> > >> >> > you >> > >> >> > > >> > adding >> > >> >> > > >> > > new >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > dependencies >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > to >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > a >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > java-exec and not updating the >> > >> excludes >> > >> >> in >> > >> >> > > this >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> module. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > This >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > is >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > important >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > as it minimizes the size of the >> > >> >> dependency >> > >> >> > > of >> > >> >> > > >> > Drill >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > application >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > users. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> /Users/asinha/incubator-drill/exec/jdbc-all/target/drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > size (44664121) too large. Max. >> is >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> 20000000/Users/asinha/incubator-drill/exec/jdbc-all/target/drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > Administrators-MacBook-Pro-144:incubator-drill >> > >> >> > > >> > > asinha$ >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> mvn >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > --version >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Apache Maven 3.0.5 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > 2013-02-19 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > 05:51:28-0800) >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Maven home: >> > >> /opt/local/share/java/maven3 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Java version: 1.7.0_45, vendor: >> > >> Oracle >> > >> >> > > >> > Corporation >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Java home: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_45.jdk/Contents/Home/jre >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Default locale: en_US, platform >> > >> >> encoding: >> > >> >> > > UTF-8 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > OS name: "mac os x", version: >> > >> "10.9.5", >> > >> >> > > arch: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> "x86_64", >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > family: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > "mac" >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:20 AM, >> > >> Jacques >> > >> >> > > >> Nadeau < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > jacq...@dremio.com> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Build back to normal. It looks >> > like >> > >> >> the >> > >> >> > > >> Apache >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> server >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> was >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > using >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > an >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > old >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > version of Maven. Once I >> > switched >> > >> to >> > >> >> > > >> something >> > >> >> > > >> > > more >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > recent, >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > build >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > passed. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > -- >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Jacques Nadeau >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:02 >> AM, >> > >> >> Jacques >> > >> >> > > >> > Nadeau < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > jacq...@dremio.com> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm... this merge caused the >> > >> Apache >> > >> >> > > build >> > >> >> > > >> to >> > >> >> > > >> > > fail. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Investigating... >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Jacques Nadeau >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:31 >> > AM, >> > >> >> > Jacques >> > >> >> > > >> > > Nadeau < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > jacq...@dremio.com> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> I got clean regression runs >> > as >> > >> >> well. >> > >> >> > > I've >> > >> >> > > >> > > merged >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > patch. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Jason, you want to start >> the >> > >> >> release >> > >> >> > > >> > process? >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> -- >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Jacques Nadeau >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at >> 10:42 >> > >> PM, >> > >> >> > > Abhishek >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Girish < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > agir...@mapr.com >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Had two clean Functional >> > runs. >> > >> >> TPC-H >> > >> >> > > >> SF100 >> > >> >> > > >> > > was >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> also >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > successful. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at >> > 10:07 >> > >> PM, >> > >> >> > > rahul >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> challapalli < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> challapallira...@gmail.com> >> > >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Kicked off a functional >> > run >> > >> with >> > >> >> > > your >> > >> >> > > >> > > branch. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Will >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > let >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > you >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > know >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > once >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > it >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > finishes >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > - Rahul >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at >> > 9:56 >> > >> PM, >> > >> >> > > >> Jacques >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Nadeau < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > jacq...@dremio.com> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > 4196 was merged >> today. I >> > >> have >> > >> >> an >> > >> >> > > >> > updated >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> patch >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > for >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > 4291 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > that >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > is >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> ready. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Unfortunately, it >> seems >> > >> that >> > >> >> > > >> something >> > >> >> > > >> > > isn't >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > working >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > with >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > our >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> extended >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > tests so I haven't >> been >> > >> able >> > >> >> to >> > >> >> > > run >> > >> >> > > >> an >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> extended >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > regression. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Unit >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> tests >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > pass. Is someone else >> > >> possibly >> > >> >> > > able >> > >> >> > > >> to >> > >> >> > > >> > > run a >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > regression >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > suite >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > against >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > this >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > branch [1] so we can >> > >> confirm >> > >> >> > > things >> > >> >> > > >> > look >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> good >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> and >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > start >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > release >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > process? >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > thanks, >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Jacques >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > [1] >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > https://github.com/jacques-n/drill/tree/DRILL-4291v2 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > -- >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Jacques Nadeau >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > CTO and Co-Founder, >> > Dremio >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 >> at >> > >> 11:20 >> > >> >> > AM, >> > >> >> > > >> > Jacques >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Nadeau >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > jacq...@dremio.com >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > I think the main >> > things >> > >> are >> > >> >> > 4196 >> > >> >> > > >> and >> > >> >> > > >> > > 4291 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > should >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > be >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > completed. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > I >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> know >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Amit >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > was able to >> reproduce >> > >> 4196 >> > >> >> > > locally >> > >> >> > > >> > this >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> weekend >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > so >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > I >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > think >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > we're >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> close >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > on >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > that. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > -- >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Jacques Nadeau >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > CTO and Co-Founder, >> > >> Dremio >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 >> > at >> > >> >> 10:14 >> > >> >> > > AM, >> > >> >> > > >> > > Zelaine >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Fong >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > zf...@maprtech.com >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> Any updates on >> this? >> > >> >> What's >> > >> >> > > >> > blocking >> > >> >> > > >> > > us >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> from >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > taking >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > this >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > to a >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> vote -- >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> sort merge join >> > issues? >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> -- Zelaine >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> On Tue, Jan 19, >> 2016 >> > at >> > >> >> 4:18 >> > >> >> > > PM, >> > >> >> > > >> > > Jacques >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > Nadeau >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> jacq...@dremio.com> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Bumping this >> > thread... >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Here are the >> issues >> > >> that >> > >> >> > were >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> mentioned in >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > this >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > thread >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > along >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> with a >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > proposed >> > >> categorization: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Release Blockers >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-progress Amit >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4190 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-progress Amit >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4196 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Ready to merge >> > Jacques >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4246 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-review Jinfeng >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4256 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-progress >> Jacques >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4278 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Ready to merge >> > Laurent >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4285 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Nice to Have >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Open Jason/Hakim >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4247 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-progress Jason >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4203 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Open Jacques >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4266 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Ready to merge >> > Jacques >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4131 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > What do others >> > think? >> > >> >> Let's >> > >> >> > > try >> > >> >> > > >> to >> > >> >> > > >> > > get >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > blockers >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > wrapped >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > up >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> in >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> next >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > day or two and >> > start a >> > >> >> > > release >> > >> >> > > >> > > vote... >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > -- >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Jacques Nadeau >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > CTO and >> Co-Founder, >> > >> >> Dremio >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > On Mon, Jan 4, >> > 2016 at >> > >> >> 1:48 >> > >> >> > > PM, >> > >> >> > > >> > > Jason >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > Altekruse >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > < >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > >> altekruseja...@gmail.com> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > wrote: >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Hello All, >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > With the >> > allocator >> > >> >> > changes >> > >> >> > > >> > merged >> > >> >> > > >> > > and >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > about >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > a >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > month >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > since >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> last >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > release >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > I think it >> would >> > be >> > >> >> good >> > >> >> > to >> > >> >> > > >> > start >> > >> >> > > >> > > a >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> vote >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > soon. I >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > would >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > like >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > to >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> volunteer >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > to >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > be release >> > manager. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > I know that >> there >> > >> were >> > >> >> > some >> > >> >> > > >> > issues >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> that >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > were >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > identified >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > after >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > transfer >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > patch was >> > merged. I >> > >> >> think >> > >> >> > > that >> > >> >> > > >> > > these >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > issues >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > should >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > be >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > fixed >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> before >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > we >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > cut a >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > release >> > candidate. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > From looking at >> > the >> > >> >> > > associated >> > >> >> > > >> > > JIRAs >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> it >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > looked >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > like >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > there >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > was >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> a >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> possible >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > short term fix >> > just >> > >> >> > > adjusting >> > >> >> > > >> > the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > max_query_memory_per_node >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > option, >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> and >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > some more >> > involved >> > >> work >> > >> >> > to >> > >> >> > > >> > change >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> how we >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > determine >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > the >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > correct >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > time >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > to >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > spill during >> > >> external >> > >> >> > > sort. I >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> believe it >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > makes >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > sense >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > to >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > make >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > external >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > sort >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > work well with >> > the >> > >> >> newly >> > >> >> > > >> > improved >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> memory >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > accounting >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > before >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > cutting a >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > release, but >> I'm >> > not >> > >> >> sure >> > >> >> > > how >> > >> >> > > >> > much >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> work >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> is >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > left >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > to >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > be >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > done >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> there. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > [1] >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Please respond >> > with >> > >> >> your >> > >> >> > > >> > thoughts >> > >> >> > > >> > > on >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> a >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > release >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > soon >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > and >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > any >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> JIRAs >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > you >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > would >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > like to include >> > in >> > >> the >> > >> >> > > >> release. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > [1] - >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4243 >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Jason >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >>
