Oh, I see. I didn't have to do it.

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Jason Altekruse <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Fair enough. I meant having my public GPG key signed by someone already in
> the Apache web of trust.
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Abdel Hakim Deneche <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> I have trouble understanding the meaning of "GPG signed" =P
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Jason Altekruse <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> A question for previous release managers. Jacques was thinking I may
>>> need to have my GPG signed to get linked into the Apache Web of Trust. Is
>>> this necessary for making a release?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Jason Altekruse <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The only solution to this issue I have found is disabling the new
>>>> plugin to automatically enforce the size of the jdbc-all plugin. I don't
>>>> know why it is behaving differently when performing a release than it did
>>>> during a 'mvn install', but I have verified the correct size of the JAR
>>>> manually and am planning on pushing a candidate soon with the small change
>>>> to disable the automatic jar size enforcement.
>>>>
>>>> I will open a JIRA for getting this resolved after the release.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Jinfeng Ni <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Good to hear this, Jacques & Jason. That makes feel relieved. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Jason Altekruse
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> > I don't think there was any issue with the merge either Jinfeng, I
>>>>> don't
>>>>> > think we need to close master. I had to step out for a few hours,
>>>>> but I am
>>>>> > working on finishing up the candidate right now.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Having a weird RAT issue running the actual maven release command,
>>>>> it's
>>>>> > complaining about a dependency-reduced-pom.xml in the target
>>>>> directory of
>>>>> > jdbc-all lacking a license header (although target directories
>>>>> should be
>>>>> > ignored). Checking out the commit before the recent changes to the
>>>>> jdbc-all
>>>>> > exclusions seems to get rid of the issue, but the changes in the pom
>>>>> file
>>>>> > don't seem like they should be causing any problems.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Still trying to debug and hoping to have a vote up tonight.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> Given how easy it is to create a branch off a random commit, I
>>>>> generally
>>>>> >> don't see a point in closing the master branch. I figure the release
>>>>> >> manager can propose where they'd like to fork if this type of thing
>>>>> comes
>>>>> >> up.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Thanks for the feedback Jinfeng. Of course you're right about
>>>>> Venki's
>>>>> >> commit. My bad.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> Jacques Nadeau
>>>>> >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Jinfeng Ni <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > Venki's backwards compatibility fix (commit id:
>>>>> >> >    03197d0) is before the partition pruning commit. So, it seems
>>>>> to be
>>>>> >> > fine to create a release candidate from 03197d0; no need to
>>>>> >> > cherry-pick.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > As for whether the partition pruning changes are risky, the
>>>>> pre-commit
>>>>> >> > run did not show any serious problems in the first run; all the
>>>>> plan
>>>>> >> > changes are expected, or expose some existing problem
>>>>> (drill-4279).
>>>>> >> > However, I agree that it impacts the main code path of query
>>>>> planning,
>>>>> >> > and I'm fine that we exclude the partition change from 1.5.0
>>>>> release,
>>>>> >> > since it's merged right before we start a voting.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > I did not see any one mentioned that the master branch is closed,
>>>>> and
>>>>> >> > therefore assume it's still open for commits.  I probably should
>>>>> have
>>>>> >> > asked whether the master was open for new patches before I merged
>>>>> the
>>>>> >> > commits.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > wrote:
>>>>> >> > > Jinfeng, do you agree that the changes are risky? I was going
>>>>> mostly by
>>>>> >> > > commit messages.
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > Also just realized that the backwards compatibility fix to the
>>>>> storage
>>>>> >> > > plugin interface is after these. Could create release branch
>>>>> from
>>>>> >> > 03197d...
>>>>> >> > > and then cherry pick the Venki change. Or could keep them all.
>>>>> Or
>>>>> >> > > go without the compatibility fix....
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > --
>>>>> >> > > Jacques Nadeau
>>>>> >> > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Jinfeng Ni <
>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> Hi Jason,
>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>> >> > >> I'm fine that release 1.5.0 starts from 03197d0f2.  One thing
>>>>> I need
>>>>> >> > >> point out is that the pre-commit test suite has some
>>>>> testcase's plan
>>>>> >> > >> output modified because of the partition pruning change.  If
>>>>> we run
>>>>> >> > >> pre-commit against the candidate release for 1.5.0, we have to
>>>>> use a
>>>>> >> > >> prior version of pre-commit suite.
>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>> >> > >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Jason Altekruse
>>>>> >> > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> > That sounds reasonable to me. I'll start preparing a release
>>>>> >> > candidate.
>>>>> >> > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> > Jinfeng, are you okay waiting for the next release to
>>>>> include this
>>>>> >> > >> change?
>>>>> >> > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > >> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> Hey Jason,
>>>>> >> > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> Can you start the release vote? We've let this drag on too
>>>>> long.
>>>>> >> > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> I suggest we start from 03197d0f2. It seems like the
>>>>> partition
>>>>> >> > pruning
>>>>> >> > >> >> changes are pretty complicated and on a pretty main path to
>>>>> add
>>>>> >> right
>>>>> >> > >> >> before the vote. Since Hsuan's fix (pr 349) hasn't been
>>>>> reviewed, I
>>>>> >> > >> think
>>>>> >> > >> >> we should start the vote without it.
>>>>> >> > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> Jacques
>>>>> >> > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> --
>>>>> >> > >> >> Jacques Nadeau
>>>>> >> > >> >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
>>>>> >> > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Hsuan Yi Chu <
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > >> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > Yes, just send a pull request.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/349
>>>>> >> > >> >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > Can Jinfeng review it?
>>>>> >> > >> >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > Thanks,
>>>>> >> > >> >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Jinfeng Ni <
>>>>> >> [email protected]
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > Sean probably is quite close to find a fix for this
>>>>> issue.
>>>>> >> Let's
>>>>> >> > see
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > whether he can post a patch soon.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:29 PM, rahul challapalli
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > > DRILL-4323 only happens when assertions are turned on
>>>>> (my
>>>>> >> > install
>>>>> >> > >> >> > script
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > > automatically enables assertions).
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > > - Rahul
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Zelaine Fong <
>>>>> >> > >> [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> Rahul,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> Let us know if you can reproduce the issue with
>>>>> assertions
>>>>> >> > turned
>>>>> >> > >> >> OFF.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > If
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> you cannot, then I think this should not be a
>>>>> blocker for
>>>>> >> 1.5,
>>>>> >> > >> and
>>>>> >> > >> >> > Hsuan
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> will continue to look into fixing this.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> -- Zelaine
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Krystal Nguyen <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > I do see the same error with assertion turned on.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Jinfeng Ni <
>>>>> >> > >> >> [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > Krystal, by any chance, did you turn on
>>>>> assertion when
>>>>> >> you
>>>>> >> > >> start
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > drillbit?
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > I think the error in drill-4323 will be raised
>>>>> when
>>>>> >> > >> assertion =
>>>>> >> > >> >> > on.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Krystal Nguyen <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > I am running drill-1.4 and is able to run
>>>>> count(*)
>>>>> >> > >> >> successfully.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > 0: jdbc:drill:zk=10.10.100.113:5181,10.10.100>
>>>>> alter
>>>>> >> > >> session
>>>>> >> > >> >> > set
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > `store.hive.optimize_scan_with_native_readers`
>>>>> = true;
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> >
>>>>> >> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > |  ok   |                        summary
>>>>> >> > >> >> >  |
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> >
>>>>> >> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > | true  |
>>>>> store.hive.optimize_scan_with_native_readers
>>>>> >> > >> >> > updated.  |
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> >
>>>>> >> +-------+--------------------------------------------------------+
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > 1 row selected (0.374 seconds)
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > 0: jdbc:drill:zk=10.10.100.113:5181,10.10.100>
>>>>> select
>>>>> >> > >> >> count(*)
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > from
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > lineitem_parquet_partitioned_hive_string;
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > +---------+
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > | EXPR$0  |
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > +---------+
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > | 60175   |
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > +---------+
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > 1 row selected (2.986 seconds)
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Jinfeng Ni <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Venki and I did some investigation for
>>>>> DRILL-4323.
>>>>> >> The
>>>>> >> > >> issue
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> reported
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> in DRILL-4323 seems to happen on 1.4.0
>>>>> release as
>>>>> >> well.
>>>>> >> > >> Seems
>>>>> >> > >> >> > to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > us
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> this is not a regression from 1.4.0; it's a
>>>>> >> regression
>>>>> >> > >> from
>>>>> >> > >> >> > 1.3.0
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> probably.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> DRILL-4083 makes the planner to use
>>>>> >> > DrillHiveNativeReader
>>>>> >> > >> in
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > stead
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> of
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> HiveReader for "select count(*) from
>>>>> hive_table"
>>>>> >> query.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > However,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Project after the scan produces empty
>>>>> schema.  Before
>>>>> >> > >> >> > DRILL-4083,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Drill uses HiveScan, which works fine.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Jason
>>>>> Altekruse
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > We could revert the change to the
>>>>> StoragePlugin
>>>>> >> > >> interface
>>>>> >> > >> >> to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > add
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > getLogicalOptimizerRules
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > and getPhysicalOptimizerRules, and only put
>>>>> those
>>>>> >> in
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> AbstractStoragePlugin
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > with default implementations.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > We could then update the docs to tell users
>>>>> to not
>>>>> >> > >> >> implement
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> interface
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > directly, and instead extend the abstract
>>>>> class,
>>>>> >> > which I
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > believe
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > would
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > allow us to make changes like this in the
>>>>> future
>>>>> >> > without
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > breaking
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> plugins.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > At a major release version we could then
>>>>> just pull
>>>>> >> up
>>>>> >> > >> all
>>>>> >> > >> >> of
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> new
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > methods we added to the abstract class into
>>>>> the
>>>>> >> > >> interface,
>>>>> >> > >> >> or
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > just
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > get
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> rid
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > of it all-together.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Venki
>>>>> Korukanti <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Here is the partial fix:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> https://github.com/vkorukanti/drill/commit/6646b0d08df274a22dff870ad5e6f6914b10fa0b
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> If the existing StragePlugins are
>>>>> implementing
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > AbstractStoragePlugin
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> class
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> this fix should resolve the backward
>>>>> compat issue.
>>>>> >> > If
>>>>> >> > >> they
>>>>> >> > >> >> > are
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> implementing
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> StoragePlugin interface directly then it
>>>>> won't
>>>>> >> > resolve
>>>>> >> > >> the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > issue.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > Not
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> sure
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> how to handle it in that case. Let me know
>>>>> if
>>>>> >> there
>>>>> >> > any
>>>>> >> > >> >> ways
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > resolve
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> this issue completely.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Thanks
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Venki
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Aman
>>>>> Sinha <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > [email protected]
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > I was able to do the build with maven
>>>>> 3.3.9
>>>>> >> (after
>>>>> >> > >> doing
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > 'brew
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > install
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > maven').  Here are my env variables
>>>>> related to
>>>>> >> > maven:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >
>>>>> M2_HOME=/usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.3.9/libexec
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >
>>>>> M2=/usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.3.9/libexec/bin
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx2048m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Jacques
>>>>> Nadeau
>>>>> >> <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > Aman, for reference on the Maven
>>>>> version
>>>>> >> issue.
>>>>> >> > You
>>>>> >> > >> >> can
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > see
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> output
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> of
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > the shade plugin between the two Apache
>>>>> >> Builds.
>>>>> >> > If
>>>>> >> > >> you
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > search
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > for
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > maven-shade-plugin you'll see that
>>>>> build 647
>>>>> >> > (maven
>>>>> >> > >> >> > 3.0.5)
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > fails
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> because
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > it
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > includes a bunch of hadoop (and other
>>>>> >> libraries
>>>>> >> > >> that
>>>>> >> > >> >> are
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> listed
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > as
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> being
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > excluded). If you look at build 648
>>>>> (maven
>>>>> >> > 3.3.3),
>>>>> >> > >> >> those
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> items
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > are
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > included
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > so that the build completes
>>>>> successfully.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/drill-scm/647/consoleText
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/drill-scm/648/consoleText
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > --
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > Jacques Nadeau
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:01 PM, rahul
>>>>> >> > challapalli
>>>>> >> > >> <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > Jason,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > As of now I haven't narrowed down
>>>>> the exact
>>>>> >> > >> commit
>>>>> >> > >> >> > which
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > caused
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > DRILL-4323
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > and I do not know the scope of the
>>>>> fix.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > - Rahul
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:39 PM,
>>>>> Jason
>>>>> >> > Altekruse
>>>>> >> > >> <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > [email protected]
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > I think it makes sense to wait for
>>>>> Venki's
>>>>> >> > fix
>>>>> >> > >> of
>>>>> >> > >> >> > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> API,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > as
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > releasing a
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > version with the change would make
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > reverting/refactoring
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > API
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > breaking
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > change less useful.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > Do you have any idea about the
>>>>> scope of
>>>>> >> > fixing
>>>>> >> > >> the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > hive
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > native
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > reader,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > or
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > which change since the 1.4 release
>>>>> broke
>>>>> >> > it? Is
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > someone
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> available
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > look
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > at it today?
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:33 PM,
>>>>> rahul
>>>>> >> > >> >> challapalli <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > Just found an issue with hive
>>>>> native
>>>>> >> > parquet
>>>>> >> > >> >> > reader
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> (DRILL-4323).
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > This
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > is a
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > regression from 1.4 and in my
>>>>> opinion
>>>>> >> > should
>>>>> >> > >> be
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > treated
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > as
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > a
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > blocker.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > - Rahul
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:12 PM,
>>>>> Venki
>>>>> >> > >> >> Korukanti <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Sorry I didn't realize I was
>>>>> breaking
>>>>> >> > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> public
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > interface
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> API.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > Let
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > me
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > work
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > on a patch to make it backward
>>>>> >> > compatible.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Thanks
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Venki
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:54
>>>>> PM,
>>>>> >> Steven
>>>>> >> > >> >> > Phillips
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > [email protected]
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > I just wanted to bring up an
>>>>> issue
>>>>> >> > that I
>>>>> >> > >> >> just
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > now
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> discovered,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > that
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > has
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > caused me a fair amount of
>>>>> grief.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/300/commits
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > DRILL-4198 changes a
>>>>> user-facing
>>>>> >> API,
>>>>> >> > and
>>>>> >> > >> >> > causes
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> StoragePlugins
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > that
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > were
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > compiled against currently
>>>>> released
>>>>> >> > >> versions
>>>>> >> > >> >> > of
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> Drill
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> no
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > longer
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > functional properly. I would
>>>>> prefer
>>>>> >> > that
>>>>> >> > >> >> this
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > breaking
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> change
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > be
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > modified
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > to be backward compatible if
>>>>> >> possible.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at
>>>>> 11:23 AM,
>>>>> >> > Jason
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > Altekruse <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Hi Aman,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > This is the failure that
>>>>> he was
>>>>> >> > >> seeing. He
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> figured
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > out
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> that
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > new
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > exclusions in jdbc-all
>>>>> were not
>>>>> >> > being
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > respected
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > when
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > build
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > was
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > run
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > with
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > an older Maven version,
>>>>> causing
>>>>> >> the
>>>>> >> > jar
>>>>> >> > >> >> size
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > increase
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > significantly.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > He
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > added an enforcer to make
>>>>> sure the
>>>>> >> > JAR
>>>>> >> > >> >> > didn't
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> grow
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > unexpectedly.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > Can
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > you
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > try to update your maven
>>>>> version
>>>>> >> and
>>>>> >> > >> >> re-run
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > build?
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > - Jason
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at
>>>>> 11:18 AM,
>>>>> >> > Aman
>>>>> >> > >> >> > Sinha <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Jacques, I am getting the
>>>>> >> > following
>>>>> >> > >> >> build
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> failure
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > on
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > latest
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > master
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > branch...is this what
>>>>> you saw
>>>>> >> for
>>>>> >> > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > Apache
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > build
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > ?
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> My
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > mvn
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > version
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > output
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > is shown below.  Should
>>>>> we all
>>>>> >> be
>>>>> >> > >> >> > upgrading
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> a
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > newer
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> mvn
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > ?
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > [INFO] ---
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > maven-enforcer-plugin:1.3.1:enforce
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> (enforce-jdbc-jar-compactness) @
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > drill-jdbc-all
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > ---
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > [WARNING] Rule 0:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.RequireFilesSize
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > failed
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > with message:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > The file
>>>>> >> > >> >> drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > is
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > outside
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > expected
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > size
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > range.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >                   This
>>>>> is likely
>>>>> >> > due
>>>>> >> > >> to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > you
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > adding
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > new
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > dependencies
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > a
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > java-exec and not
>>>>> updating the
>>>>> >> > >> excludes
>>>>> >> > >> >> in
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > this
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> module.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > This
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > is
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > important
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > as it minimizes the size
>>>>> of the
>>>>> >> > >> >> dependency
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > of
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > Drill
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > application
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > users.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> /Users/asinha/incubator-drill/exec/jdbc-all/target/drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > size (44664121) too
>>>>> large. Max.
>>>>> >> is
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> 20000000/Users/asinha/incubator-drill/exec/jdbc-all/target/drill-jdbc-all-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > Administrators-MacBook-Pro-144:incubator-drill
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > asinha$
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> mvn
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > --version
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Apache Maven 3.0.5
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >
>>>>> (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da;
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > 2013-02-19
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > 05:51:28-0800)
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Maven home:
>>>>> >> > >> /opt/local/share/java/maven3
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Java version: 1.7.0_45,
>>>>> vendor:
>>>>> >> > >> Oracle
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > Corporation
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Java home:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_45.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Default locale: en_US,
>>>>> platform
>>>>> >> > >> >> encoding:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > UTF-8
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > OS name: "mac os x",
>>>>> version:
>>>>> >> > >> "10.9.5",
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > arch:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> "x86_64",
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > family:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > "mac"
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at
>>>>> 8:20 AM,
>>>>> >> > >> Jacques
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> Nadeau <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Build back to normal.
>>>>> It looks
>>>>> >> > like
>>>>> >> > >> >> the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> Apache
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> server
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> was
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > using
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > an
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > old
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > version of Maven. Once
>>>>> I
>>>>> >> > switched
>>>>> >> > >> to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> something
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > more
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > recent,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > build
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > passed.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > --
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Jacques Nadeau
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > CTO and Co-Founder,
>>>>> Dremio
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016
>>>>> at 7:02
>>>>> >> AM,
>>>>> >> > >> >> Jacques
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > Nadeau <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm... this merge
>>>>> caused the
>>>>> >> > >> Apache
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > build
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > fail.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > Investigating...
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > --
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Jacques Nadeau
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > CTO and Co-Founder,
>>>>> Dremio
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016
>>>>> at 6:31
>>>>> >> > AM,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > Jacques
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > Nadeau <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> I got clean
>>>>> regression runs
>>>>> >> > as
>>>>> >> > >> >> well.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > I've
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > merged
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > patch.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Jason, you want to
>>>>> start
>>>>> >> the
>>>>> >> > >> >> release
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > process?
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> --
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Jacques Nadeau
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> CTO and Co-Founder,
>>>>> Dremio
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, Jan 27,
>>>>> 2016 at
>>>>> >> 10:42
>>>>> >> > >> PM,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > Abhishek
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Girish <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > [email protected]
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Had two clean
>>>>> Functional
>>>>> >> > runs.
>>>>> >> > >> >> TPC-H
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> SF100
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > was
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> also
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > successful.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 27,
>>>>> 2016 at
>>>>> >> > 10:07
>>>>> >> > >> PM,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > rahul
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> challapalli <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>>>> >> [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > >> >> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Kicked off a
>>>>> functional
>>>>> >> > run
>>>>> >> > >> with
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > your
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > branch.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Will
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > let
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > you
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > know
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > once
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > it
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > finishes
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > - Rahul
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > On Wed, Jan 27,
>>>>> 2016 at
>>>>> >> > 9:56
>>>>> >> > >> PM,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> Jacques
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> Nadeau <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > 4196 was merged
>>>>> >> today. I
>>>>> >> > >> have
>>>>> >> > >> >> an
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > updated
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> patch
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > for
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > 4291
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > that
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > is
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> ready.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Unfortunately,
>>>>> it
>>>>> >> seems
>>>>> >> > >> that
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> something
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > isn't
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > working
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > with
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > our
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> extended
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > tests so I
>>>>> haven't
>>>>> >> been
>>>>> >> > >> able
>>>>> >> > >> >> to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > run
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> an
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> extended
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > regression.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Unit
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> tests
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > pass. Is
>>>>> someone else
>>>>> >> > >> possibly
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > able
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > run a
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > regression
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > suite
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > against
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > this
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > branch [1] so
>>>>> we can
>>>>> >> > >> confirm
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > things
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > look
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> good
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> and
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > start
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > release
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > process?
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > thanks,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Jacques
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > [1]
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > https://github.com/jacques-n/drill/tree/DRILL-4291v2
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > --
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Jacques Nadeau
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > CTO and
>>>>> Co-Founder,
>>>>> >> > Dremio
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > On Mon, Jan
>>>>> 25, 2016
>>>>> >> at
>>>>> >> > >> 11:20
>>>>> >> > >> >> > AM,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > Jacques
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Nadeau
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > I think the
>>>>> main
>>>>> >> > things
>>>>> >> > >> are
>>>>> >> > >> >> > 4196
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> and
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > 4291
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > should
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > be
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > completed.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > I
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> know
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Amit
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > was able to
>>>>> >> reproduce
>>>>> >> > >> 4196
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > locally
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > this
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> weekend
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > so
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > I
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > think
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > we're
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> close
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > on
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > that.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > --
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Jacques
>>>>> Nadeau
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > CTO and
>>>>> Co-Founder,
>>>>> >> > >> Dremio
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > On Mon, Jan
>>>>> 25, 2016
>>>>> >> > at
>>>>> >> > >> >> 10:14
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > AM,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > Zelaine
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> Fong
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> Any updates
>>>>> on
>>>>> >> this?
>>>>> >> > >> >> What's
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > blocking
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > us
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> from
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > taking
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > this
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > to a
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> vote --
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> sort merge
>>>>> join
>>>>> >> > issues?
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> -- Zelaine
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> On Tue, Jan
>>>>> 19,
>>>>> >> 2016
>>>>> >> > at
>>>>> >> > >> >> 4:18
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > PM,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > Jacques
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > Nadeau
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> [email protected]
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Bumping
>>>>> this
>>>>> >> > thread...
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Here are
>>>>> the
>>>>> >> issues
>>>>> >> > >> that
>>>>> >> > >> >> > were
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> mentioned in
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > this
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > thread
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > along
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> with a
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > proposed
>>>>> >> > >> categorization:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Release
>>>>> Blockers
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>>> In-progress Amit
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4190
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>>> In-progress Amit
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4196
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Ready to
>>>>> merge
>>>>> >> > Jacques
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4246
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > In-review
>>>>> Jinfeng
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4256
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>>> In-progress
>>>>> >> Jacques
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4278
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Ready to
>>>>> merge
>>>>> >> > Laurent
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4285
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Nice to
>>>>> Have
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Open
>>>>> Jason/Hakim
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4247
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>>> In-progress Jason
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4203
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Open
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4266
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Ready to
>>>>> merge
>>>>> >> > Jacques
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4131
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > What do
>>>>> others
>>>>> >> > think?
>>>>> >> > >> >> Let's
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > try
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > get
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > blockers
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > wrapped
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > up
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> in
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> next
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > day or
>>>>> two and
>>>>> >> > start a
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > release
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > vote...
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > --
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > Jacques
>>>>> Nadeau
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > CTO and
>>>>> >> Co-Founder,
>>>>> >> > >> >> Dremio
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > On Mon,
>>>>> Jan 4,
>>>>> >> > 2016 at
>>>>> >> > >> >> 1:48
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > PM,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > Jason
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > Altekruse
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > <
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> [email protected]>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Hello
>>>>> All,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > With the
>>>>> >> > allocator
>>>>> >> > >> >> > changes
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > merged
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > and
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > about
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > a
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > month
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > since
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> last
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > release
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > I think
>>>>> it
>>>>> >> would
>>>>> >> > be
>>>>> >> > >> >> good
>>>>> >> > >> >> > to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > start
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > a
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> vote
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > soon. I
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > would
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > like
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> volunteer
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > be
>>>>> release
>>>>> >> > manager.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > I know
>>>>> that
>>>>> >> there
>>>>> >> > >> were
>>>>> >> > >> >> > some
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > issues
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> that
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > were
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > identified
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > after
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > transfer
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > patch
>>>>> was
>>>>> >> > merged. I
>>>>> >> > >> >> think
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > that
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > these
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > issues
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > should
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > be
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > fixed
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> before
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > we
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > cut a
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > release
>>>>> >> > candidate.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > From
>>>>> looking at
>>>>> >> > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > associated
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > JIRAs
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> it
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > looked
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > like
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > there
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > was
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> a
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> possible
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > short
>>>>> term fix
>>>>> >> > just
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > adjusting
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > max_query_memory_per_node
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > option,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> and
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > some
>>>>> more
>>>>> >> > involved
>>>>> >> > >> work
>>>>> >> > >> >> > to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > change
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> how we
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > determine
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > correct
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > time
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > spill
>>>>> during
>>>>> >> > >> external
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > sort. I
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> believe it
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > makes
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > sense
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > make
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > external
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > sort
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > work
>>>>> well with
>>>>> >> > the
>>>>> >> > >> >> newly
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > improved
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> memory
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > accounting
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > before
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > cutting a
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >
>>>>> release, but
>>>>> >> I'm
>>>>> >> > not
>>>>> >> > >> >> sure
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > how
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > much
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> work
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> is
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > left
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > to
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > be
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > done
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> there.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > [1]
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Please
>>>>> respond
>>>>> >> > with
>>>>> >> > >> >> your
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > thoughts
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > on
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> a
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > release
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > soon
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > and
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > any
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> JIRAs
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > you
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > would
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > like to
>>>>> include
>>>>> >> > in
>>>>> >> > >> the
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> release.
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > [1] -
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4243
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Thanks,
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > Jason
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >> > > >>
>>>>> >> > >> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> >> >
>>>>> >> > >> >>
>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Abdelhakim Deneche
>>
>> Software Engineer
>>
>>   <http://www.mapr.com/>
>>
>>
>> Now Available - Free Hadoop On-Demand Training
>> <http://www.mapr.com/training?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Signature&utm_campaign=Free%20available>
>>
>
>


-- 

Abdelhakim Deneche

Software Engineer

  <http://www.mapr.com/>


Now Available - Free Hadoop On-Demand Training
<http://www.mapr.com/training?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Signature&utm_campaign=Free%20available>

Reply via email to