I think we should start with the FELIX infra and then see whether we need to create a new one when the need is there.
About the package renaming, I'm in favour of going with org.apache.felix.karaf just because it emphasizes that felix is not about the framework. If we make an exception then this sends a strange message IMO. regards, Karl On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote: > On 4/27/09 6:07 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> >> Yes, they do. The definition of a subproject is imho just something >> controlled by a given TLP. >> The way its infrastructure is set up has nothing to do with that. A >> lot of TLP uses multiple JIRA and confluence spaces for different >> reasons. >> > > My point was, this subproject is apparently not going to be treated like any > other Felix subproject. > > -> richard > >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:03, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 4/27/09 5:57 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> It seems the consensus for the code is to move it to >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/karaf >>>> So i'll go ahead and move the servicemix kernel trunk there asap. >>>> >>>> We still need to settle the problems of: >>>> * package name: org.apache.karaf vs org.apache.felix.karaf >>>> * jira issue tracker: use FELIX or create a new KARAF one >>>> * web site: use FELIX or create a new KARAF one >>>> >>>> The package renaming to org.apache.karaf has raised a number of >>>> concerns, mostly (correct me if i'm wrong) about the fact whether this >>>> would be frowned upong by the ASF or not. Given the number of >>>> subprojects that do that since a long time, I think the answer is no. >>>> Now we need to decide if we want to do this or not. >>>> >>>> For the issue tracker and web site, I think this is somewhat related >>>> to the package renaming issue above, though the problem is a bit >>>> different. I'm really opened here, but if we choose to rename the >>>> packages to org.apache.karaf, it think it would make more sense to >>>> have dedicated JIRA and confluence spaces. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> And is this how other projects do it too? >>> >>> It seems this is a subproject in name only. >>> >>> -> richard >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:26, Guillaume Nodet<gno...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to start moving the ServiceMix Kernel code into Felix now. >>>>> Given the size of the code base, I think it would be better to just >>>>> move the tree into its own top level svn structure. >>>>> I'd like to run the following command: >>>>> >>>>> svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/kernel >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/karaf >>>>> >>>>> Any objections in doing that ? >>>>> >>>>> Next steps will include creating a JIRA project and moving all the >>>>> issues into it (with a KARAF id), then the confluence space. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Guillaume Nodet >>>>> ------------------------ >>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>>>> ------------------------ >>>>> Open Source SOA >>>>> http://fusesource.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> > -- Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com
