Great ! Seems the discussion is over, so we should now think about
executing this plan.
Any volunteer ?

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 13:36, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, I'm not really convinced, but since it seems there is a lot of
> reluctance I think we should aim for:
>  * packages in org.apache.felix.karaf
>  * use existing FELIX infrastructure (mailing list, jira tracker,
> confluence space)
>
> I think we should start with the above and reconsider later if there is a 
> need.
> Is everyone satisfied with the above ?
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:17, Karl Pauls <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I think we should start with the FELIX infra and then see whether we
>> need to create a new one when the need is there.
>>
>> About the package renaming, I'm in favour of going with
>> org.apache.felix.karaf just because it emphasizes that felix is not
>> about the framework. If we make an exception then this sends a strange
>> message IMO.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Karl
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Richard S. Hall <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> On 4/27/09 6:07 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, they do.  The definition of a subproject is imho just something
>>>> controlled by a given TLP.
>>>> The way its infrastructure is set up has nothing to do with that.  A
>>>> lot of TLP uses multiple JIRA and confluence spaces for different
>>>> reasons.
>>>>
>>>
>>> My point was, this subproject is apparently not going to be treated like any
>>> other Felix subproject.
>>>
>>> -> richard
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:03, Richard S. Hall<[email protected]>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/27/09 5:57 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems the consensus for the code is to move it to
>>>>>>    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/karaf
>>>>>> So i'll go ahead and move the servicemix kernel trunk there asap.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We still need to settle the problems of:
>>>>>>    * package name: org.apache.karaf vs org.apache.felix.karaf
>>>>>>    * jira issue tracker: use FELIX or create a new KARAF one
>>>>>>    * web site: use FELIX or create a new KARAF one
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The package renaming to org.apache.karaf has raised a number of
>>>>>> concerns, mostly (correct me if i'm wrong) about the fact whether this
>>>>>> would be frowned upong by the ASF or not.  Given the number of
>>>>>> subprojects that do that since a long time, I think the answer is no.
>>>>>>  Now we need to decide if we want to do this or not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the issue tracker and web site, I think this is somewhat related
>>>>>> to the package renaming issue above, though the problem is a bit
>>>>>> different.  I'm really opened here, but if we choose to rename the
>>>>>> packages to org.apache.karaf, it think it would make more sense to
>>>>>> have dedicated JIRA and confluence spaces.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And is this how other projects do it too?
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems this is a subproject in name only.
>>>>>
>>>>> ->  richard
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:26, Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]>
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to start moving the ServiceMix Kernel code into Felix now.
>>>>>>> Given the size of the code base, I think it would be better to just
>>>>>>> move the tree into its own top level svn structure.
>>>>>>> I'd like to run the following command:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/kernel
>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/karaf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any objections in doing that ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Next steps will include creating a JIRA project and moving all the
>>>>>>> issues into it (with a KARAF id), then the confluence space.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Karl Pauls
>> [email protected]
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to