Sounds good to me.

regards,

Karl

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2009/4/27 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
>
>> Ok, I'm not really convinced, but since it seems there is a lot of
>> reluctance I think we should aim for:
>>  * packages in org.apache.felix.karaf
>>  * use existing FELIX infrastructure (mailing list, jira tracker,
>> confluence space)
>>
>> I think we should start with the above and reconsider later if there is a
>> need.
>> Is everyone satisfied with the above ?
>>
>
> fine with me (fwiw, I don't mind so much about the package name convention)
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:17, Karl Pauls <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I think we should start with the FELIX infra and then see whether we
>> > need to create a new one when the need is there.
>> >
>> > About the package renaming, I'm in favour of going with
>> > org.apache.felix.karaf just because it emphasizes that felix is not
>> > about the framework. If we make an exception then this sends a strange
>> > message IMO.
>> >
>> > regards,
>> >
>> > Karl
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Richard S. Hall <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> On 4/27/09 6:07 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes, they do.  The definition of a subproject is imho just something
>> >>> controlled by a given TLP.
>> >>> The way its infrastructure is set up has nothing to do with that.  A
>> >>> lot of TLP uses multiple JIRA and confluence spaces for different
>> >>> reasons.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> My point was, this subproject is apparently not going to be treated like
>> any
>> >> other Felix subproject.
>> >>
>> >> -> richard
>> >>
>> >>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:03, Richard S. Hall<[email protected]>
>> >>>  wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 4/27/09 5:57 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> It seems the consensus for the code is to move it to
>> >>>>>    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/karaf
>> >>>>> So i'll go ahead and move the servicemix kernel trunk there asap.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> We still need to settle the problems of:
>> >>>>>    * package name: org.apache.karaf vs org.apache.felix.karaf
>> >>>>>    * jira issue tracker: use FELIX or create a new KARAF one
>> >>>>>    * web site: use FELIX or create a new KARAF one
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The package renaming to org.apache.karaf has raised a number of
>> >>>>> concerns, mostly (correct me if i'm wrong) about the fact whether
>> this
>> >>>>> would be frowned upong by the ASF or not.  Given the number of
>> >>>>> subprojects that do that since a long time, I think the answer is no.
>> >>>>>  Now we need to decide if we want to do this or not.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> For the issue tracker and web site, I think this is somewhat related
>> >>>>> to the package renaming issue above, though the problem is a bit
>> >>>>> different.  I'm really opened here, but if we choose to rename the
>> >>>>> packages to org.apache.karaf, it think it would make more sense to
>> >>>>> have dedicated JIRA and confluence spaces.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> And is this how other projects do it too?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It seems this is a subproject in name only.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ->  richard
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:26, Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]>
>> >>>>>  wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I'd like to start moving the ServiceMix Kernel code into Felix now.
>> >>>>>> Given the size of the code base, I think it would be better to just
>> >>>>>> move the tree into its own top level svn structure.
>> >>>>>> I'd like to run the following command:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>    svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/kernel
>> >>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/karaf
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Any objections in doing that ?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Next steps will include creating a JIRA project and moving all the
>> >>>>>> issues into it (with a KARAF id), then the confluence space.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>> >>>>>> ------------------------
>> >>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >>>>>> ------------------------
>> >>>>>> Open Source SOA
>> >>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Karl Pauls
>> > [email protected]
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers, Stuart
>



-- 
Karl Pauls
[email protected]

Reply via email to