Agreed. If the traffic becomes too much, we can reconsider this option later without much impact.
I'm more concerned about the package name / jira instance which impacts compatibility / tracability if changed. On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 13:01, Stuart McCulloch <mccu...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/4/27 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> > >> As James mentioned in the other thread, subprojects may also have >> dedicated mailing lists that are usually in xxx-...@tlp.apache.org / >> xxx-us...@tlp.apache.org ... >> > > the downside of separate lists is that this severely reduces the possible > interaction between sub-project communities - I'd really like to continue > with just the top-level dev/users lists until there was a pressing need to > keep them separate... > > otherwise as Richard says, this doesn't feel part of the Felix community > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:03, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote: >> > On 4/27/09 5:57 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> >> >> >> It seems the consensus for the code is to move it to >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/karaf >> >> So i'll go ahead and move the servicemix kernel trunk there asap. >> >> >> >> We still need to settle the problems of: >> >> * package name: org.apache.karaf vs org.apache.felix.karaf >> >> * jira issue tracker: use FELIX or create a new KARAF one >> >> * web site: use FELIX or create a new KARAF one >> >> >> >> The package renaming to org.apache.karaf has raised a number of >> >> concerns, mostly (correct me if i'm wrong) about the fact whether this >> >> would be frowned upong by the ASF or not. Given the number of >> >> subprojects that do that since a long time, I think the answer is no. >> >> Now we need to decide if we want to do this or not. >> >> >> >> For the issue tracker and web site, I think this is somewhat related >> >> to the package renaming issue above, though the problem is a bit >> >> different. I'm really opened here, but if we choose to rename the >> >> packages to org.apache.karaf, it think it would make more sense to >> >> have dedicated JIRA and confluence spaces. >> >> >> > >> > And is this how other projects do it too? >> > >> > It seems this is a subproject in name only. >> > >> > -> richard >> > >> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:26, Guillaume Nodet<gno...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> I'd like to start moving the ServiceMix Kernel code into Felix now. >> >>> Given the size of the code base, I think it would be better to just >> >>> move the tree into its own top level svn structure. >> >>> I'd like to run the following command: >> >>> >> >>> svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/kernel >> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/karaf >> >>> >> >>> Any objections in doing that ? >> >>> >> >>> Next steps will include creating a JIRA project and moving all the >> >>> issues into it (with a KARAF id), then the confluence space. >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Cheers, >> >>> Guillaume Nodet >> >>> ------------------------ >> >>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >>> ------------------------ >> >>> Open Source SOA >> >>> http://fusesource.com >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> > > > > -- > Cheers, Stuart > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
