I've only copy the smx kernel trunk into felix so far and was waiting
for the discussion to settle.
We need to address the following tasks:
  * package renaming (see discussion about blueprint, it might be
appropriate to wait a bit or use the branch instead)
  * move jira issues (i'm not an admin on FELIX jira instance, but if
I could be granted that, i could create a component and start moving
the issues).  I'm experimenting a bit with the CSV import to see if
that could help.  I guess the other solution is to recreate the
existing issues.
  * move web site.  I think this should be easy to move the pages into
FELIX using confluence, the next step is then to replace all
references from ServiceMix Kernel to Karaf

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 15:59, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
> On 4/28/09 9:52 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>> Great ! Seems the discussion is over, so we should now think about
>> executing this plan.
>> Any volunteer ?
>>
>
> I thought you were already doing it! :-)
>
> -> richard
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 13:36, Guillaume Nodet<gno...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Ok, I'm not really convinced, but since it seems there is a lot of
>>> reluctance I think we should aim for:
>>>  * packages in org.apache.felix.karaf
>>>  * use existing FELIX infrastructure (mailing list, jira tracker,
>>> confluence space)
>>>
>>> I think we should start with the above and reconsider later if there is a
>>> need.
>>> Is everyone satisfied with the above ?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:17, Karl Pauls<karlpa...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think we should start with the FELIX infra and then see whether we
>>>> need to create a new one when the need is there.
>>>>
>>>> About the package renaming, I'm in favour of going with
>>>> org.apache.felix.karaf just because it emphasizes that felix is not
>>>> about the framework. If we make an exception then this sends a strange
>>>> message IMO.
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>>
>>>> Karl
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/27/09 6:07 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, they do.  The definition of a subproject is imho just something
>>>>>> controlled by a given TLP.
>>>>>> The way its infrastructure is set up has nothing to do with that.  A
>>>>>> lot of TLP uses multiple JIRA and confluence spaces for different
>>>>>> reasons.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My point was, this subproject is apparently not going to be treated
>>>>> like any
>>>>> other Felix subproject.
>>>>>
>>>>> ->  richard
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:03, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org>
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/27/09 5:57 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It seems the consensus for the code is to move it to
>>>>>>>>    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/karaf
>>>>>>>> So i'll go ahead and move the servicemix kernel trunk there asap.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We still need to settle the problems of:
>>>>>>>>    * package name: org.apache.karaf vs org.apache.felix.karaf
>>>>>>>>    * jira issue tracker: use FELIX or create a new KARAF one
>>>>>>>>    * web site: use FELIX or create a new KARAF one
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The package renaming to org.apache.karaf has raised a number of
>>>>>>>> concerns, mostly (correct me if i'm wrong) about the fact whether
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> would be frowned upong by the ASF or not.  Given the number of
>>>>>>>> subprojects that do that since a long time, I think the answer is
>>>>>>>> no.
>>>>>>>>  Now we need to decide if we want to do this or not.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For the issue tracker and web site, I think this is somewhat related
>>>>>>>> to the package renaming issue above, though the problem is a bit
>>>>>>>> different.  I'm really opened here, but if we choose to rename the
>>>>>>>> packages to org.apache.karaf, it think it would make more sense to
>>>>>>>> have dedicated JIRA and confluence spaces.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And is this how other projects do it too?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It seems this is a subproject in name only.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ->    richard
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:26, Guillaume Nodet<gno...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'd like to start moving the ServiceMix Kernel code into Felix now.
>>>>>>>>> Given the size of the code base, I think it would be better to just
>>>>>>>>> move the tree into its own top level svn structure.
>>>>>>>>> I'd like to run the following command:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/kernel
>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/karaf
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any objections in doing that ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Next steps will include creating a JIRA project and moving all the
>>>>>>>>> issues into it (with a KARAF id), then the confluence space.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Karl Pauls
>>>> karlpa...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to