I'll do the wiki move in Confluence if I can get admin permissions in the Felix space.
I could also do some of the pom.xml refactoring (artifact and groupid, descriptions, etc) as long as it won't affect your blueprint service patch. Chris -- Chris Custine FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've only copy the smx kernel trunk into felix so far and was waiting > for the discussion to settle. > We need to address the following tasks: > * package renaming (see discussion about blueprint, it might be > appropriate to wait a bit or use the branch instead) > * move jira issues (i'm not an admin on FELIX jira instance, but if > I could be granted that, i could create a component and start moving > the issues). I'm experimenting a bit with the CSV import to see if > that could help. I guess the other solution is to recreate the > existing issues. > * move web site. I think this should be easy to move the pages into > FELIX using confluence, the next step is then to replace all > references from ServiceMix Kernel to Karaf > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 15:59, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> > wrote: > > On 4/28/09 9:52 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> > >> Great ! Seems the discussion is over, so we should now think about > >> executing this plan. > >> Any volunteer ? > >> > > > > I thought you were already doing it! :-) > > > > -> richard > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 13:36, Guillaume Nodet<gno...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Ok, I'm not really convinced, but since it seems there is a lot of > >>> reluctance I think we should aim for: > >>> * packages in org.apache.felix.karaf > >>> * use existing FELIX infrastructure (mailing list, jira tracker, > >>> confluence space) > >>> > >>> I think we should start with the above and reconsider later if there is > a > >>> need. > >>> Is everyone satisfied with the above ? > >>> > >>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:17, Karl Pauls<karlpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> I think we should start with the FELIX infra and then see whether we > >>>> need to create a new one when the need is there. > >>>> > >>>> About the package renaming, I'm in favour of going with > >>>> org.apache.felix.karaf just because it emphasizes that felix is not > >>>> about the framework. If we make an exception then this sends a strange > >>>> message IMO. > >>>> > >>>> regards, > >>>> > >>>> Karl > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Richard S. Hall< > he...@ungoverned.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 4/27/09 6:07 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Yes, they do. The definition of a subproject is imho just something > >>>>>> controlled by a given TLP. > >>>>>> The way its infrastructure is set up has nothing to do with that. A > >>>>>> lot of TLP uses multiple JIRA and confluence spaces for different > >>>>>> reasons. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> My point was, this subproject is apparently not going to be treated > >>>>> like any > >>>>> other Felix subproject. > >>>>> > >>>>> -> richard > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:03, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 4/27/09 5:57 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> It seems the consensus for the code is to move it to > >>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/karaf > >>>>>>>> So i'll go ahead and move the servicemix kernel trunk there asap. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> We still need to settle the problems of: > >>>>>>>> * package name: org.apache.karaf vs org.apache.felix.karaf > >>>>>>>> * jira issue tracker: use FELIX or create a new KARAF one > >>>>>>>> * web site: use FELIX or create a new KARAF one > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The package renaming to org.apache.karaf has raised a number of > >>>>>>>> concerns, mostly (correct me if i'm wrong) about the fact whether > >>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>> would be frowned upong by the ASF or not. Given the number of > >>>>>>>> subprojects that do that since a long time, I think the answer is > >>>>>>>> no. > >>>>>>>> Now we need to decide if we want to do this or not. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> For the issue tracker and web site, I think this is somewhat > related > >>>>>>>> to the package renaming issue above, though the problem is a bit > >>>>>>>> different. I'm really opened here, but if we choose to rename the > >>>>>>>> packages to org.apache.karaf, it think it would make more sense to > >>>>>>>> have dedicated JIRA and confluence spaces. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> And is this how other projects do it too? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It seems this is a subproject in name only. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -> richard > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:26, Guillaume Nodet<gno...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I'd like to start moving the ServiceMix Kernel code into Felix > now. > >>>>>>>>> Given the size of the code base, I think it would be better to > just > >>>>>>>>> move the tree into its own top level svn structure. > >>>>>>>>> I'd like to run the following command: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> svn cp > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/kernel > >>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/karaf > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Any objections in doing that ? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Next steps will include creating a JIRA project and moving all > the > >>>>>>>>> issues into it (with a KARAF id), then the confluence space. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet > >>>>>>>>> ------------------------ > >>>>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > >>>>>>>>> ------------------------ > >>>>>>>>> Open Source SOA > >>>>>>>>> http://fusesource.com > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Karl Pauls > >>>> karlpa...@gmail.com > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Cheers, > >>> Guillaume Nodet > >>> ------------------------ > >>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > >>> ------------------------ > >>> Open Source SOA > >>> http://fusesource.com > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com >
