2009/4/28 Chris Custine <ccust...@apache.org>: > I'll do the wiki move in Confluence if I can get admin permissions in the > Felix space.
Done > I could also do some of the pom.xml refactoring (artifact and groupid, > descriptions, etc) as long as it won't affect your blueprint service patch. > > Chris > -- > Chris Custine > FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com > My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com > Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org > Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I've only copy the smx kernel trunk into felix so far and was waiting >> for the discussion to settle. >> We need to address the following tasks: >> * package renaming (see discussion about blueprint, it might be >> appropriate to wait a bit or use the branch instead) >> * move jira issues (i'm not an admin on FELIX jira instance, but if >> I could be granted that, i could create a component and start moving >> the issues). I'm experimenting a bit with the CSV import to see if >> that could help. I guess the other solution is to recreate the >> existing issues. >> * move web site. I think this should be easy to move the pages into >> FELIX using confluence, the next step is then to replace all >> references from ServiceMix Kernel to Karaf >> >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 15:59, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> >> wrote: >> > On 4/28/09 9:52 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> >> >> >> Great ! Seems the discussion is over, so we should now think about >> >> executing this plan. >> >> Any volunteer ? >> >> >> > >> > I thought you were already doing it! :-) >> > >> > -> richard >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 13:36, Guillaume Nodet<gno...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Ok, I'm not really convinced, but since it seems there is a lot of >> >>> reluctance I think we should aim for: >> >>> * packages in org.apache.felix.karaf >> >>> * use existing FELIX infrastructure (mailing list, jira tracker, >> >>> confluence space) >> >>> >> >>> I think we should start with the above and reconsider later if there is >> a >> >>> need. >> >>> Is everyone satisfied with the above ? >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:17, Karl Pauls<karlpa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I think we should start with the FELIX infra and then see whether we >> >>>> need to create a new one when the need is there. >> >>>> >> >>>> About the package renaming, I'm in favour of going with >> >>>> org.apache.felix.karaf just because it emphasizes that felix is not >> >>>> about the framework. If we make an exception then this sends a strange >> >>>> message IMO. >> >>>> >> >>>> regards, >> >>>> >> >>>> Karl >> >>>> >> >>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Richard S. Hall< >> he...@ungoverned.org> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On 4/27/09 6:07 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Yes, they do. The definition of a subproject is imho just something >> >>>>>> controlled by a given TLP. >> >>>>>> The way its infrastructure is set up has nothing to do with that. A >> >>>>>> lot of TLP uses multiple JIRA and confluence spaces for different >> >>>>>> reasons. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> My point was, this subproject is apparently not going to be treated >> >>>>> like any >> >>>>> other Felix subproject. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -> richard >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:03, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org >> > >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On 4/27/09 5:57 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> It seems the consensus for the code is to move it to >> >>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/karaf >> >>>>>>>> So i'll go ahead and move the servicemix kernel trunk there asap. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> We still need to settle the problems of: >> >>>>>>>> * package name: org.apache.karaf vs org.apache.felix.karaf >> >>>>>>>> * jira issue tracker: use FELIX or create a new KARAF one >> >>>>>>>> * web site: use FELIX or create a new KARAF one >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> The package renaming to org.apache.karaf has raised a number of >> >>>>>>>> concerns, mostly (correct me if i'm wrong) about the fact whether >> >>>>>>>> this >> >>>>>>>> would be frowned upong by the ASF or not. Given the number of >> >>>>>>>> subprojects that do that since a long time, I think the answer is >> >>>>>>>> no. >> >>>>>>>> Now we need to decide if we want to do this or not. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> For the issue tracker and web site, I think this is somewhat >> related >> >>>>>>>> to the package renaming issue above, though the problem is a bit >> >>>>>>>> different. I'm really opened here, but if we choose to rename the >> >>>>>>>> packages to org.apache.karaf, it think it would make more sense to >> >>>>>>>> have dedicated JIRA and confluence spaces. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> And is this how other projects do it too? >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> It seems this is a subproject in name only. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> -> richard >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:26, Guillaume Nodet<gno...@gmail.com> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> I'd like to start moving the ServiceMix Kernel code into Felix >> now. >> >>>>>>>>> Given the size of the code base, I think it would be better to >> just >> >>>>>>>>> move the tree into its own top level svn structure. >> >>>>>>>>> I'd like to run the following command: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> svn cp >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/kernel >> >>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/karaf >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Any objections in doing that ? >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Next steps will include creating a JIRA project and moving all >> the >> >>>>>>>>> issues into it (with a KARAF id), then the confluence space. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >> >>>>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet >> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------ >> >>>>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------ >> >>>>>>>>> Open Source SOA >> >>>>>>>>> http://fusesource.com >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Karl Pauls >> >>>> karlpa...@gmail.com >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Cheers, >> >>> Guillaume Nodet >> >>> ------------------------ >> >>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >>> ------------------------ >> >>> Open Source SOA >> >>> http://fusesource.com >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
