Hi, I would also prefer UserAdmin over JAAS, since this would allow for other implementations of that service to provide access control.
For example Carsten and I have once been discussing implementing UserAdmin on top of a JCR Repository (e.g. Jackrabbit) to leverage existing user setups. Regards Felix Guillaume Nodet schrieb: > I need to read a bit more about UserAdmin. > I think it should be possible to have a JAAS LoginModule delegating to > UserAdmin. > > However, for the console, it may be quite easy to come up with a very > simple interface that would delegate to either JAAS or UserAdmin. The > OSGi EEG is working on a spec for integrating JAAS into OSGi, so I > think it makes sense to be able to support both. > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:08, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote: >> Marcel Offermans wrote: >>> On May 27, 2009, at 8:53 , Gert Vanthienen wrote: >>> >>>> For securing the web console, >>>> wouldn't it make sense to integrate that with Karaf's JAAS support, so >>>> we can plug in other providers afterwards (e.g. things like LDAP)? >>> Should we not use the UserAdmin compendium service for that? To be >>> honest, I'm not familiar with Karaf's JAAS support, is that build as an >>> implementation of UserAdmin? >>> >> Yes, I think we should go with UserAdmin, too. >> >> Carsten >> >> -- >> Carsten Ziegeler >> [email protected] >> > > >
