I'd remove the first one because it is implied by the second one. I'm not really sure what "providing features and services" really tell anyone. What about: "a platform for creating OSGi-based servers" ? I think we're really closed to what we had first (minus the work 'enterprise' which seems to have been the root of all this thread).
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 00:18, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote: > On 6/8/10 5:54 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > >> On Jun 8, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Richard S. Hall wrote: >> >> >>> How about something like: >>> >>> A generic OSGi-based platform providing features and services for >>> creating OSGi-based server applications. >>> >>> >> That's much better, in my opinion, though one of those "OSGI-based" >> is probably redundant. >> >> > > Yeah, I debated that too, but they do serve different purposes. The Karaf > platform itself is a layer on top of OSGi (i.e., it's OSGi based) and the > purpose of Karaf is to help you build OSGi-based servers, not non-OSGi-based > servers. However, if that is clear to everyone saying it only once, then we > just need to decide which "OSGi-based" to remove... > > -> richard > > ....Roy >> >> >> > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
