Harbs,
2) I need the Alert and ColorPicker components that's not in the 4.9
release.
If you're talking about the ones in the experimental.swc, there are in the
4.9 but you can use them with en_US only, I re-worked them in the develop
branch, so if you want to use them and even to have an SDK you can use with
IntelliJ, constantly updated, chekout the develop branch, do a first build,
a release, use the makeApacheFlexForFlashBuilder on the released develop
branch itself, not the resulting binaries.
Like that you can set this fresh SDK as the SDK you use if you want to make
change in the SDK, you'll have only to run the ant target corresponding to
the lib you modified (and the other.locales too) and you'll be able to test
it right away on your sample projects.
Ask me if I haven't been completly clear.
-Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:27 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting source working in Flash Builder
Hi,
I did use the installer.
Which would of given you last release 4.9.
The issue is that I'm trying to use the source rather than the
distribution for two reasons:
1) I wanted to look into the TLF bugs that were reported.
2) I need the Alert and ColorPicker components that's not in the 4.9
release.
Make a release build from the source with ant release, copy and unzip/untar
the release and use the script in the IDE directory to make an SDK usable
for Flash Builder or any other IDE.
Does the source need to be compiled before it can work?
Um yes. The source gets compiled in swcs (in the frameworks/lib directory)
that your Flex application uses.
I wonder if now would be a good time to try InteliJ IDEA...
You would still have the package the SDK up, your issue is not unique to
just Flash Builder.
Hope that helps.
Justin
