Don't you think guys that is too much references, regarding what Alex found?
We are writing in AS - what about emphasis this to RoyaleAS? I'm still not sure yet whether name change convince me.. Piotr On Thu, Sep 14, 2017, 03:35 Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote: > Wasn't Royale the beta name for some version of Flex? [Flex 2? or was > it Flex 1?] > > > On 9/13/2017 6:30 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > > > I did a quick suitable name search. > > > > Royale might be taken by this individual’s project > > https://github.com/ian-culleton/royale > > > > Otherwise Royale in a TESS search is liquor and beauty products mostly. > > There is a lot of “Clash Royale" > > > > And there is also “Royale with Cheese” - a reference in Pulp Fiction > > to what a Macdonald’s Quarter Pounder is called in Paris. > > > > Regards, > > Dave > > > >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:09 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net > >> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote: > >> > >> Hi - > >> > >> We have one alternative name - Royale > >> > >> Are there others that people would like to propose? > >> > >> If not then we can have a simple VOTE between FlexJS and Royale. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Dave > >> > >>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net > >>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Om, > >>> > >>> I think that dilutes the votes and biases the result towards FlexJS. > >>> If we want to go that way then we need a preference ranking and more > >>> complicated VOTE counting. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Dave > >>> > >>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:57 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > >>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> We could always structure the VOTE like this: > >>>> > >>>> 1. Royale > >>>> 2. XXX > >>>> 3. YYY > >>>> 4. FlexJS > >>>> > >>>> One vote should answer both questions. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Om > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Zarzycki > >>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On the other hand, we have rather majority of voices for do not > >>>>> change the > >>>>> name and Alex is right. - I'm seeing more people asking for help with > >>>>> porting. - We may disappear in the sea of frameworks with changed > >>>>> name... > >>>>> > >>>>> Maybe better have solid framework and invest in current name still > >>>>> with > >>>>> nice branding. I'm puzzled, so definitely I will give myself at > >>>>> least one > >>>>> day more before VOTE. > >>>>> > >>>>> Piotr > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> 2017-09-13 23:31 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki > >>>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>: > >>>>> > >>>>>> +1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name change. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to > >>>>>> build new > >>>>>> brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can > always > >>>>> state > >>>>>> from where we have come and what was our story. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup "Royale" > >>>>>> as the > >>>>>> most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we use > >>>>>> it since > >>>>>> it was code name of Macromedia Framework ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Piotr > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net > >>>>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>>: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi - > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>> <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Carlos’ argument carries weight to me. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it, > >>>>>>>> that’s > >>>>>>> value I can recognize. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be > >>>>>>>> involved > >>>>>>> in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around > >>>>>>> the name. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I do > >>>>> about > >>>>>>> mine. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t > >>>>>>>> want to > >>>>>>> delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new > >>>>>>> name can > >>>>> we > >>>>>>> try and pick one quickly? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow morning. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the > >>>>>>> result then > >>>>>>> we can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>> Dave > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Harbs > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira < > >>>>>>> carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com > >>>>>>> <mailto:carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really > >>>>>>>>> important > >>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is > >>>>>>> important in > >>>>>>>>> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we > >>>>>>>>> don't > >>>>>>> get a > >>>>>>>>> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where we > >>>>>>> explain > >>>>>>>>> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our > >>>>>>>>> time, > >>>>>>> since > >>>>>>>>> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS > >>>>>>>>> projects, and > >>>>>>>>> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things other > >>>>> than > >>>>>>> JS!! > >>>>>>>>> (If we want in future years to make it possible). > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name > for > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki > >>>>>> > >>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557> > >>>>>> skype: zarzycki10 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > >>>>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> > >>>>> Piotr Zarzycki > >>>>> > >>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 > >>>>> skype: zarzycki10 > >>>>> > >>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > >>>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > >>>>> > >>> > >> > > > > -- > Jeffry Houser > Technical Entrepreneur > http://www.dot-com-it.com > http://www.jeffryhouser.com > 203-379-0773 > >
