+1 for the 1.12.2 release On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 3:20 AM Matthias Pohl <matth...@ververica.com> wrote:
> Thanks Yuan for driving 1.12.2. > +1 for releasing 1.12.2 > > One comment about FLINK-21030 [1]: I hope to fix it this week. But there > are still some uncertainties. The underlying problem is older than 1.12. > Hence, the suggestion is to not block the 1.12.2 release because of > FLINK-21030 [1]. I will leave it as a blocker issue, though, to underline > that it should be fixed for 1.13. > > Best, > Matthias > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21030 > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 4:10 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Yuan, > > > > +1 for releasing 1.12.2 and Yuan as the release manager. > > > > Thank you~ > > > > Xintong Song > > > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 3:41 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 for releasing 1.12.2, and thanks for volunteering to be our release > > > manager Yuan. > > > > > > Besides the mentioned issues, I could see two more blockers with 1.12.2 > > as > > > fix version [1] and need some tracking: > > > * FLINK-21013 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21013> > Blink > > > planner does not ingest timestamp into StreamRecord > > > * FLINK- 21030 <http://Broken job restart for job with disjoint graph> > > > Broken > > > job restart for job with disjoint graph > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Yu > > > > > > [1] https://s.apache.org/flink-1.12.2-blockers > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 at 08:57, Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for being our release manager Yuan. > > > > > > > > We found a out of memory issue [1] which will affect most batch jobs > > > thus I > > > > think > > > > it would be great if we can include this fix in 1.12.2. > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20663 > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Kurt > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 12:36 AM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks for volunteering for being our release manager Yuan :-) > > > > > > > > > > +1 for a timely bug fix release. > > > > > > > > > > I will try to review the PR for FLINK- 20417 [1] which is a good > fix > > to > > > > > include in the next bug fix release. We don't have to block the > > release > > > > on > > > > > this fix though. > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20417 > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Till > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:12 PM Piotr Nowojski < > pnowoj...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Yuan for bringing up this topic. > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for the quick 1.12.2 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > As Yuan mentioned, me and Roman can help whenever committer > rights > > > will > > > > > be > > > > > > required. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am a Firefox user and I just fixed a long lasting bug > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14848 , wish this would be > > > merged > > > > > in > > > > > > this release. > > > > > > > > > > > > I will push to speed up review of your PR. Let's try to merge it > > > before > > > > > > 1.12.2, but at the same time I wouldn't block the release on this > > > bug. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Piotrek > > > > > > > > > > > > pt., 5 lut 2021 o 12:12 郁蓝 <happyhacker...@foxmail.com> > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Yuan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am a Firefox user and I just fixed a long lasting bug > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14848 , wish this would > be > > > > merged > > > > > > in > > > > > > > this release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ > > > > > > > 发件人: > > > > > > > "dev" > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > yuanmei.w...@gmail.com>; > > > > > > > 发送时间: 2021年2月5日(星期五) 晚上6:36 > > > > > > > 收件人: "dev"<dev@flink.apache.org>; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 主题: [DISCUSS] Releasing Apache Flink 1.12.2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey devs, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One of the major issues that have not been resolved in Apache > > Flink > > > > > > 1.12.1 > > > > > > > is "unaligned > > > > > > > checkpoint recovery may lead to corrupted data stream"[1]. > Since > > > the > > > > > > > problem is now fixed and > > > > > > > it is critical to the users, I would like to kick off a > > discussion > > > on > > > > > > > releasing Flink 1.12.2 that > > > > > > > includes unaligned checkpoint fixes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to volunteer myself for managing this release. > But I > > > > > noticed > > > > > > > that some of the release > > > > > > > steps may require committer authorities. Luckily, Piotr and > Roman > > > are > > > > > > very > > > > > > > kind to provide help > > > > > > > on such steps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Apart from the unaligned checkpoint issue, please let us know > in > > > this > > > > > > > thread if there are any > > > > > > > other fixes that we should try to include in this version. I'll > > try > > > > to > > > > > > > communicate with the issue > > > > > > > owners and come up with a time estimation next week. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20654 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best > > > > > > > Yuan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
